Gene Therapy, Successful Against Parkinson's, Continues on the Road to Redemption

By Patrick Morgan | March 17, 2011 3:27 pm

Back in the 1980s, gene therapy was one of science’s greatest hopes and hypes, and researchers predicted the technique would be used to cure a huge range of illnesses. During the 90s, many early gene therapy trials were effective or downright dangerous, some causing cancer or even death. But more recently, scientists who stuck with gene therapy have started to see positive results, with promising treatments for malformed hemoglobin, color blindness, and depression. (See the DISCOVER magazine feature “The Second Coming of Gene Therapy” for more.) Now, researchers have announced that they’ve successfully treated the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease in a small group of people—a far cry from a cure, but still a step in the right direction.

I Once Was Blind but Now I See

The theory behind gene therapy is simple: A healthy gene hitches a ride into the patient’s genome on a virus, replacing the genes responsible for some genetic disease or disorder. Actually doing this is more difficult, because humans have a little thing called an immune system that’s remarkably efficient at finding and destroying foreign bodies. After the first U.S. death from gene therapy in 1999, and leukemia cases in France the same year, many started to think that gene therapy was more of a problem than an answer.

The early and awful failures forced all of the researchers in the field to retreat and reconsider the staggering complexity that challenged them. They could not just replace a bad gene with a good gene, as some early pundits had hoped—they also had to orchestrate the nuanced and elaborate dance between the gene products (proteins) and the patient’s immune system, which could recognize a foreign body and viciously attack it. After that was settled, gene therapists still had to find a suitable virus, or vector, to carry replacement genes into human cells without inciting a damaging or deadly immune response…. It was this new perspective more than anything else that turned gene therapy from a simple but failed and frustrated hope into, once again, medicine’s next big thing—a stunning spectacle of hubris, ignominy, and redemption on the scientific stage. [DISCOVER]

New: Gene Therapy and Parkinson’s Disease

While there’s no cure for Parkinson’s as of yet, doctors have an arsenal of methods, ranging from drugs, brain stimulation, and (now) gene therapy that help reduce the disease’s symptoms. Hopes for using gene therapy to alleviate Parkinson’s effects aren’t new. What is new is that scientists have successfully completed the first randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of treating Parkison’s patients with gene therapy—and they found that it significantly improved debilitating symptoms such as tremors, motor skill problems, and rigidity.The basic premise is that Parkison’s patients’ movement problems is caused from an overactive brain region: the subthalamic nucleus. If scientists could introduce a gene into that region of the brain that would produce GABA—an inhibitory chemical—then they could potentially quiet that brain region and alleviate tremors.

The therapy, which was done with local anesthesia, used a harmless, inactive virus [AAV-2 GAD] to deliver the GAD gene into each patient’s subthalamic nucleus, a key brain region involving motor function. The gene instructs cells to begin making GABA neurotransmitters to re-establish the normal chemical balance that becomes dysfunctional as the disease progresses. [US News]

After injecting the virus into the brains of 22 patients and administering a placebo to 23 others, the scientists discovered 6 months later (when the patients’ motor skills were assessed), that the gene therapy group’s motor abilities improved by 23.1%, while the placebo group only improved by 12.7%.

As the researchers told the BBC, this technique “shows the promise of gene therapy for other neurological disorders,” but they urged caution because the relative improvement of 10.4% is “rather small.” Importantly, it doesn’t match the most effective method currently used: Deep brain stimulation has about twice the rate of clinical improvement than gene therapy does.

On a Hot Streak

This latest triumph of gene therapy is merely one cobble in the long road to redemption. As 80beats covered previously, a similar brain-related gene therapy method has been used to treat depression in mice. Just like the Parkinson’s treatment, it involves piggybacking a gene on a virus and changing a neurotransmitter system:

The gene in question creates a protein called p11 that helps carry serotonin receptors up to the surface of a brain cell where they can receive signals from other brain cells. Poor serotonin signaling may be one of the major drivers behind depression, and a dearth of p11 could worsen the problem, according to study author Michael Kaplitt. [80beats]

Another promising gene therapy technique seeks to mitigate the HIV virus’s weakening of the immune system:

Carl June and colleagues tested six male patients who already had HIV and were taking a standard antiviral regimen. Like many HIV patients, the drugs helped them, but their counts of immune cells stayed low. June’s team tested a therapy created by Sangamo BioSciences in Richmond, California, that alters a patient’s actual white blood cells to make them more HIV-resistant. [80beats]

Researchers removed a sample of CD4+ T cells, the type of immune cells affected by HIV, from each man and used Sangamo’s enzyme to disrupt the CCR5 gene, which encodes a protein that HIV uses to enter CD4+ cells. The engineered cells were then infused back into the patients. Immune-cell counts subsequently rose for five of the six patients who received the therapy. “It’s very exciting,” says John Rossi, a molecular biologist at the City of Hope’s Beckman Research Institute in Duarte, California. “If they did this several times in a given patient, you could establish a high percentage of resistant cells.” [Nature]

But as in the other cases, we shouldn’t get too excited about these humble starts: There’s a big difference between alleviating symptoms and curing a disease, and in the case of HIV, those promising results were only in a population of six patients.

Oddly enough, modified viruses in the same family as HIV serve as the gene-shuttles for some gene therapies, including those aimed at people with beta-thalassaemia, a condition that results in faulty hemoglobin. In this case, by shoving a gene into a tweaked lentivirus (a group that includes HIV), the scientists were able to edit the defective genes, allowing the patient’s body to create working hemoglobin.

Gene therapy has also been used for rather less debilitating conditions, like color blindness. In one case, researchers used gene therapy to cure red-green color blindness in two adult monkeys:

In the new study, published in Nature, the researchers used a type of squirrel monkey in which the males lack a visual pigment called L-opsin. Its absence renders the monkeys color-blind, unable to distinguish reds and green. Most of the females, on the other hand, see in full color. So the scientists got to wondering: what would happen if they gave a boy squirrel monkey the same opsin that girls have [Scientific American]. They used a harmless virus to ferry in the gene that makes opsin, injecting the virus behind the monkeys’ retinas. [80beats]

Though they target different genes for different reasons, all of these gene therapy techniques share the same fundamental methods, and study by study, they’re redeeming a once-tarnished discipline—but all the same it’ll be many years before these specific methods become standard medical procedures.

Related Content:
80beats: Gene Therapy Hope for HIV: Engineered Stem Cells Hold Promise
80beats: Gene Therapy That Bulks up Muscles Raises Doping Concerns80beats: Gene Therapy Restores Sight to the Blind
DISCOVER: The Second Coming of Gene Therapy

Image: iStockphoto

  • Robbie

    THEY CAN SAVE THIRTEEN!!!

  • J. Wong

    I think you meant “[in]effective or downright dangerous”.

  • stu

    “…the gene therapy group’s motor abilities improved by 23.1%, while the placebo group only improved by 12.7%.”

    As someone who looks after a person with Parkinson’s I am a little confused by the results. How did the researchers measure the improvement? What does 23.1% actually mean?

    The other rather strange result is the improvement of 12.7% in Parkinson’s patients taking a placebo. How can a placebo improve the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease?

    With a placebo apparently resulting in improvement, the really quite bizarre conclusion is reached that gene therapy has a “relative improvement of 10.4%”.

  • John S

    @stu The placebo effect is real and shows the power of our minds to produce changes in our health (that’s why you test against placebo). The question is, how long do these results endure? I suspect that if the patients continue to be tracked that the placebo effect will disappear while the gene therapy effect will remain constant or perhaps even increase over longer durations.

  • michael murno

    I am a 73 year old architect who has built airport terminals and hospitals, and has taught water color painting and pen ink sketching. I have had noticeable systems of Parkinsons for about 5 years now and the disease is causing me to be unable to return to work (I canot catch my breath) and my latest symptons involve total lack of balance recovery. As a result,I fall a great deal and cannot walk moderately withou bending over and tripping n the skightest raised sidewalk edge. I would happily undergo any treatment that can promise 23% improved mobility as now it is difficult to use the computer keyboard, AutoCAD drafting, and mouse due to shaking. I take LevaDopra and Selegilene, but have to restrict the dosage due to nausea and psychosis, plus inabiliy to execute a planed workflow sequence and I misplace things from the LevaDopra. Can anyone guide me to gene therapy or some other alleviation of the oncoming worsening symptons? I desperately want to go sking this winter, but it would be suicide in my present state and I may have to give up driving.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

80beats

80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »