<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Those Graphic New Cigarette Labels Won&#039;t Help, Psychology Says</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/06/24/those-graphic-new-cigarette-labels-wont-help-psychology-says/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/06/24/those-graphic-new-cigarette-labels-wont-help-psychology-says/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Here</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/06/24/those-graphic-new-cigarette-labels-wont-help-psychology-says/#comment-28068</link>
		<dc:creator>Here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=29873#comment-28068</guid>
		<description>As a former smoker, I can tell you they scare some people but mostly annoy the rest. So the millions invested in this kind of ads will be ignored by millions of people who are great at finding creative ways of hiding these disturbing images. How many ex-smokers do you know who quit because of these labels? People don&#039;t need to be told what they already know</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a former smoker, I can tell you they scare some people but mostly annoy the rest. So the millions invested in this kind of ads will be ignored by millions of people who are great at finding creative ways of hiding these disturbing images. How many ex-smokers do you know who quit because of these labels? People don&#8217;t need to be told what they already know</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramesh Raghuvanshi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/06/24/those-graphic-new-cigarette-labels-wont-help-psychology-says/#comment-28066</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramesh Raghuvanshi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jun 2011 03:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=29873#comment-28066</guid>
		<description>Those who are addicted  with cigarettes they will ignore the warning on packet.People who are smoker they really punishing themselves  for guilt feeling.Impact of guilt feeling is always so strong without  punishing your self you cannot relief.All though this relief is temporary, victim cannot avoid it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those who are addicted  with cigarettes they will ignore the warning on packet.People who are smoker they really punishing themselves  for guilt feeling.Impact of guilt feeling is always so strong without  punishing your self you cannot relief.All though this relief is temporary, victim cannot avoid it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Too</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/06/24/those-graphic-new-cigarette-labels-wont-help-psychology-says/#comment-28065</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 22:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=29873#comment-28065</guid>
		<description>I challenge the results of this study on first principles.

If true, it would mean that all the lifestyle marketing, product placement, package design, and all the related activities of the tobacco companies were meaningless.  As in, they generated no value whatsoever to the companies funding their marketing campaigns.  It might even go further and indicate that all commercial marketing activities everywhere are pointless!

While this mathematically possible, self-interest for said companies would indicate that a useless expense avoided goes directly to the bottom line.  That&#039;s a powerful incentive to find the effectiveness of marketing.  We&#039;re talking about the commercial equivalent of natural selection.

If positive marketing works then negative marketing also ought to work.

Something does not add up here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I challenge the results of this study on first principles.</p>
<p>If true, it would mean that all the lifestyle marketing, product placement, package design, and all the related activities of the tobacco companies were meaningless.  As in, they generated no value whatsoever to the companies funding their marketing campaigns.  It might even go further and indicate that all commercial marketing activities everywhere are pointless!</p>
<p>While this mathematically possible, self-interest for said companies would indicate that a useless expense avoided goes directly to the bottom line.  That&#8217;s a powerful incentive to find the effectiveness of marketing.  We&#8217;re talking about the commercial equivalent of natural selection.</p>
<p>If positive marketing works then negative marketing also ought to work.</p>
<p>Something does not add up here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anebt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/06/24/those-graphic-new-cigarette-labels-wont-help-psychology-says/#comment-28064</link>
		<dc:creator>anebt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 01:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=29873#comment-28064</guid>
		<description>I started smoking in 1998 when I was 32. I decided to quit because it was just tiring to carry around an ash tray around the house.  The motivation was, ironically, nit inspired by any gory images or warnings of dire consequences but of personal inconvenience in the comfort of my home. (To all the statists--no, I don&#039;t have kids, and my spouse smokes too.) When I started reducing my smoking, I noticed the lifelong (until 1998) OCD that crippled me my entire life (and almost really endangered me) come back, a disease I&#039;ve had since I was 5.

Tobacco for many is a way to self-medicate. Yes, tobacco pills are used to treat OCD but in the stomach, tobacco doesn&#039;t readily hit the brain. Tobacco is the best anti-obsessive for OCD folks and for Bipolars, the latter who smoke at a 60% rate, far higher than the 21% quoted for the general population.

Antidepressants didn&#039;t work with me. Nothing really does for severe OCD, especially the obsessive-dominant type.   I suspect the hard-cores may be medicating and may not even know it.  Ditto for alcohol and pot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I started smoking in 1998 when I was 32. I decided to quit because it was just tiring to carry around an ash tray around the house.  The motivation was, ironically, nit inspired by any gory images or warnings of dire consequences but of personal inconvenience in the comfort of my home. (To all the statists&#8211;no, I don&#8217;t have kids, and my spouse smokes too.) When I started reducing my smoking, I noticed the lifelong (until 1998) OCD that crippled me my entire life (and almost really endangered me) come back, a disease I&#8217;ve had since I was 5.</p>
<p>Tobacco for many is a way to self-medicate. Yes, tobacco pills are used to treat OCD but in the stomach, tobacco doesn&#8217;t readily hit the brain. Tobacco is the best anti-obsessive for OCD folks and for Bipolars, the latter who smoke at a 60% rate, far higher than the 21% quoted for the general population.</p>
<p>Antidepressants didn&#8217;t work with me. Nothing really does for severe OCD, especially the obsessive-dominant type.   I suspect the hard-cores may be medicating and may not even know it.  Ditto for alcohol and pot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/06/24/those-graphic-new-cigarette-labels-wont-help-psychology-says/#comment-28063</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=29873#comment-28063</guid>
		<description>debra cole

I had to laugh when I read your comment about the &quot;two ton tessies&quot;. It reminded me of my older sister who once told me that smoking was stupid. I bit my tongue and refrained from telling her that being 100 lbs overweight isn&#039;t to damn smart either. It would have been a waste of breath to say anything to her. Her arrogancy level is so high that while flowing out of her mouth like water in a spillway, it also plugs up her ears. LOL  Thanks for the laugh, I am glad to know I am not the only one who has experienced the insipid arrogance of the &quot;two ton tessie&quot;. (Maybe some day we can get together and gripe about how these same women are sometimes the worst &#039;tail-gators&#039; and rudest drivers on the highways. I mean, behind the wheel of a car seems to be the only place they can move fast in life and they get really obnoxious with any one who slows them down)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>debra cole</p>
<p>I had to laugh when I read your comment about the &#8220;two ton tessies&#8221;. It reminded me of my older sister who once told me that smoking was stupid. I bit my tongue and refrained from telling her that being 100 lbs overweight isn&#8217;t to damn smart either. It would have been a waste of breath to say anything to her. Her arrogancy level is so high that while flowing out of her mouth like water in a spillway, it also plugs up her ears. LOL  Thanks for the laugh, I am glad to know I am not the only one who has experienced the insipid arrogance of the &#8220;two ton tessie&#8221;. (Maybe some day we can get together and gripe about how these same women are sometimes the worst &#8216;tail-gators&#8217; and rudest drivers on the highways. I mean, behind the wheel of a car seems to be the only place they can move fast in life and they get really obnoxious with any one who slows them down)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fester</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/06/24/those-graphic-new-cigarette-labels-wont-help-psychology-says/#comment-28062</link>
		<dc:creator>Fester</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:38:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=29873#comment-28062</guid>
		<description>Try to think back... :  Before you became addicted to, or &quot;sold on&quot; a certain product, did a simple marketing tool, like product packaging, ever get you to change your behavior?  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try to think back&#8230; :  Before you became addicted to, or &#8220;sold on&#8221; a certain product, did a simple marketing tool, like product packaging, ever get you to change your behavior?  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/06/24/those-graphic-new-cigarette-labels-wont-help-psychology-says/#comment-28061</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=29873#comment-28061</guid>
		<description>gommygoomy,

Good comment. I would like to add one of my own: How about graphic pictures of people dying of aids on condom packages and a government enforced statement &quot;Warning: condoms fail 13 percent of the time while abstinence works every time it is tried&quot;. Or maybe graphic photos of gay guys making love and a government statement like this: &quot;Caution: HIV and the AIDS virus are predominate in the homosexual community.&quot;  Maybe every thing that contains sugar should have graphic pictures of grossly obese dead bodies and labeling that says &quot;Caution: Diabetes rates are progressing at a pace that will soon eclipse the number of people killing themselves with Tobacco products&quot;.  Here is a good one: Graphic pictures of people killed while trying to escape communism, from behind the Berlin wall or Cambodian and Vietnamese people drowning, getting hacked to pieces by pirates, or raped and a warning label on both paper and electronic voting ballots that say &quot;Caution: Voting for nanny state politicians leads to communist oppression.&quot; I mean if the govt is going to insist on being mom and dad to us all, why not make it really count.

All of the above examples are offensive, of course, but then, the heart and soul of political correctness is outrageousness, offense, arrogance. Do-gooders trying to tell every one else how to live, so, as ridiculous and offensive as those things might be, why not? If a little do-gooderness is good enough for the goose, it&#039;s good enough for the gander.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gommygoomy,</p>
<p>Good comment. I would like to add one of my own: How about graphic pictures of people dying of aids on condom packages and a government enforced statement &#8220;Warning: condoms fail 13 percent of the time while abstinence works every time it is tried&#8221;. Or maybe graphic photos of gay guys making love and a government statement like this: &#8220;Caution: HIV and the AIDS virus are predominate in the homosexual community.&#8221;  Maybe every thing that contains sugar should have graphic pictures of grossly obese dead bodies and labeling that says &#8220;Caution: Diabetes rates are progressing at a pace that will soon eclipse the number of people killing themselves with Tobacco products&#8221;.  Here is a good one: Graphic pictures of people killed while trying to escape communism, from behind the Berlin wall or Cambodian and Vietnamese people drowning, getting hacked to pieces by pirates, or raped and a warning label on both paper and electronic voting ballots that say &#8220;Caution: Voting for nanny state politicians leads to communist oppression.&#8221; I mean if the govt is going to insist on being mom and dad to us all, why not make it really count.</p>
<p>All of the above examples are offensive, of course, but then, the heart and soul of political correctness is outrageousness, offense, arrogance. Do-gooders trying to tell every one else how to live, so, as ridiculous and offensive as those things might be, why not? If a little do-gooderness is good enough for the goose, it&#8217;s good enough for the gander.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sa</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/06/24/those-graphic-new-cigarette-labels-wont-help-psychology-says/#comment-28060</link>
		<dc:creator>sa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=29873#comment-28060</guid>
		<description>goomy you are not kind or compassionate, but then anger and feelings of righteousness make us all more immature. If you don&#039;t want there to be abortions, support easily accessible birth control for men and women.

Also, as an on-again off-again smoker, seeing &quot;No Smoking&quot; signs, information about quitting on billboards, other people smoking... (let alone the same &quot;graphic&quot; pictures of smoker&#039;s lungs I&#039;ve been seeing since grade-school health class) DO make me want a cigarette. I can go hours and hours without smoking. But as soon as it occurs to me that I could smoke... I do. If we want more people to be able to quit we have about 50 billion &quot;no smoking&quot; signs to remove.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>goomy you are not kind or compassionate, but then anger and feelings of righteousness make us all more immature. If you don&#8217;t want there to be abortions, support easily accessible birth control for men and women.</p>
<p>Also, as an on-again off-again smoker, seeing &#8220;No Smoking&#8221; signs, information about quitting on billboards, other people smoking&#8230; (let alone the same &#8220;graphic&#8221; pictures of smoker&#8217;s lungs I&#8217;ve been seeing since grade-school health class) DO make me want a cigarette. I can go hours and hours without smoking. But as soon as it occurs to me that I could smoke&#8230; I do. If we want more people to be able to quit we have about 50 billion &#8220;no smoking&#8221; signs to remove.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/06/24/those-graphic-new-cigarette-labels-wont-help-psychology-says/#comment-28059</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 21:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=29873#comment-28059</guid>
		<description>@wncchester  Oh yeah, conservatives are totally rooted in reality.  People lived at the same time as the dinosaurs, it&#039;s good for the economy to drain the nations coffers by fighting wars, there is a God spelled with a capital &quot;G&quot;, this is a christian nation, etc...

Hey asshole, shut the f*ck up and learn something.  Quit parroting what you&#039;re told to say and think and figure it out for yourself.  I&#039;m warning you:  it will be frightening when you&#039;re able to see the truth as it really is, and you won&#039;t be able to make total sense of it because choosing to live is not a logical choice, but you&#039;ll still want to anyway.  You might even discover why some people are liberal and some are conservative but most are actually shades of both if you take those words for their literal meanings.  You want freedom, huh?  You really want freedom?  Then free your f*cking mind from the lies you let yourself believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@wncchester  Oh yeah, conservatives are totally rooted in reality.  People lived at the same time as the dinosaurs, it&#8217;s good for the economy to drain the nations coffers by fighting wars, there is a God spelled with a capital &#8220;G&#8221;, this is a christian nation, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>Hey asshole, shut the f*ck up and learn something.  Quit parroting what you&#8217;re told to say and think and figure it out for yourself.  I&#8217;m warning you:  it will be frightening when you&#8217;re able to see the truth as it really is, and you won&#8217;t be able to make total sense of it because choosing to live is not a logical choice, but you&#8217;ll still want to anyway.  You might even discover why some people are liberal and some are conservative but most are actually shades of both if you take those words for their literal meanings.  You want freedom, huh?  You really want freedom?  Then free your f*cking mind from the lies you let yourself believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/06/24/those-graphic-new-cigarette-labels-wont-help-psychology-says/#comment-28058</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 20:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=29873#comment-28058</guid>
		<description>@JohnR22 While I respect your point of view, it is incredibly simplistic and ill-informed.  The truth is that there will always be powerful institutions imposing &quot;regulations&quot; and restricting freedoms on individuals.  With a strongly democratic (=democracy, not Democrats) government, the powerful institution can best serve the needs of individual citizens and will probably be a little socialist leaning.  Without a strong democratic government, the most powerful institutions that will emerge will likely be businesses, who are not beholden to the populace but rather to the bottom line (and are more like dictatorships).  At this societal extreme, the only people who will have any such freedom whatsoever will be the rich.  Is this what you want?  Because that&#039;s really what you&#039;re arguing for with your simplistic comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@JohnR22 While I respect your point of view, it is incredibly simplistic and ill-informed.  The truth is that there will always be powerful institutions imposing &#8220;regulations&#8221; and restricting freedoms on individuals.  With a strongly democratic (=democracy, not Democrats) government, the powerful institution can best serve the needs of individual citizens and will probably be a little socialist leaning.  Without a strong democratic government, the most powerful institutions that will emerge will likely be businesses, who are not beholden to the populace but rather to the bottom line (and are more like dictatorships).  At this societal extreme, the only people who will have any such freedom whatsoever will be the rich.  Is this what you want?  Because that&#8217;s really what you&#8217;re arguing for with your simplistic comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
