Stem Cells From Skin Suggest a Way Save Endangered Rhinos and Primates

By Veronique Greenwood | September 6, 2011 1:15 pm

spacing is important
With only seven northern white rhinos left in the world, creating eggs and sperm from stem cells offers the possibility of salvaging some of the species.

What’s the News: In an effort to help preserve endangered rhinos and primates, biologists have converted skin cells taken from the animals into pluripotent stem cells, which can grow into nearly anything, given the right conditions. They might even grow into egg and sperm cells, eventually, the researchers think, suggesting a cell biological route to conservation.

How the Heck:

  • The samples came from a repository at the San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research called the Frozen Zoo, where cells from 8600 animals of 800 species have been preserved.
  • Using lab-grown viruses, the team inserted four genes that have been shown to make human cells revert to their pluripotent state into skin cells from the northern white rhino and the drill, a primate that’s one of the most endangered mammals in Africa.
  • Over the course of a few weeks, a small fraction of the cells morphed into pluripotent stem cells, displaying markers on their surfaces that let researcher identify them.

 

What’s the Context:

  • When attempts to preserve an animal’s habitat in the wild fail, conservationists try to keep the species alive through captive breeding programs. But many animals fail to thrive in captivity and either do not mate or do not care for their offspring. When even captive breeding fails, scientists begin projects like this one, exploring whether stem cells or genetic technologies can help salvage what’s left of the species.
  • There are only seven northern white rhinos—two female, five male—left in the world; all are in captivity and none have had offspring since 2000. The drill is hunted for bush meat in the small region of Africa where it lives and attempts at captive breeding are hampered by pervasive diabetes in the captive population, perhaps because it was founded with just a few individuals. For these species, the authors write, “extraordinary measures are required to prevent extinction.”

 

The Future Holds:

  • Biologists would like to be able to make sperm and egg cells, or gametes, from such stem cells, with the aim of creating embryos that can be implanted into the wombs of surrogate mothers of the same or another species. Making gametes from stem cells is an active area of research—recently, Japanese scientists announced the first animal born from such cells, a mouse—but there is a still long way before such procedures are established.
  • Stem cells could also help alleviate the diabetes of the captive drill population, if they could be grown into pancreatic cells to replace the drills’ malfunctioning versions.
  • Even if this technique turns out to be helpful in making new baby rhinos and drills, though, it will never be able to erase the fact that the vast majority of these species have died due to habitat loss and hunting. Much of the genetic diversity that once existed is lost, as well as whatever cultural heritage these animals once had, and captive breeding programs will continue to suffer from that loss. The best approach to conservation will continue to be preserving habitat.

Reference: Ben-Nun et al. Induced pluripotent stem cells from highly endangered species. Nature Methods (4 September 2011), doi:10.1038/nmeth.1706

(via New Scientist)

Image courtesy of Ikiwaner / Wikimedia Commons

  • Rick

    A species represented by seven individuals isn’t ecologically important. Resurrecting an extinct species or nearly extinct species is done for us not for them. And the results can be increased suffering; in much of the recovering Canada goose historic range, the birds aren’t welcome and thousands are killed every year because some find them now to be a nuisance. The same is true with reintroduced wolves; as the population grows, there is increased effort to institute a hunting season; hunters in the Midwest US are itching to start killing them. This is the way it always goes. We should protect the white rhinos but let them die off if they cannot recover naturally.

  • Bruno Domingues

    “With only seven white rhinos left in the world” says the caption…

    ??

    “There are only seven white rhinos—two female, five male—left in the world”

    Is this for real? We lost another one if so… animals like this need mom’s teachings.
    At a loss for that, little cubs are just prey, adults are dysfunctional. We could keep some alive, but for what? Out of morbid curiosity? To remember what could have been?

    I saw one of these in kruger, South Africa, just last year. Maybe it was a black rhino? Anyway, these creatures are divine, we shouldn’t be allowed to mess this so much.

    I know some great examples of homo sapiens, really adorable critters. But as a species, well, what can I say that’s new? We’re going to cry, but who’s going to listen?

    (/gnznttx)
    Sad stuff this is. When read this I do, failing I can see we are. Capable we are not to care for others.
    When going to get it those fucks hang on profit will? Kill nature we can, live after we cannot.

    Or maybe eat money their children can?
    (gnznttx)

    We will keep on evolving for the next millennium and on, but the weed and cockroach diet could be so much more varied, y’know?

  • Gordon Wells

    I’m sure your number of seven is wrong. It’s probably more like seven thousand, unless you’re referring to one of the subspecies.

  • m

    interesting.

    i read somewhere that animals that dont care for their offspring in a zoo is because they do not percieve any threats within a zoo environment. unlike the wild that has multiple predators.

    the “nurture instinct” does not get “switched on”. (i probably misread the theory though…it was a while ago)

    who knows?? still…i agree that habitate protection is the best way.

  • http://www.patshipman.com Pat Shipman

    The Southern White rhino is numbered at 20,600. It is the Northern White Rhino that is probably extinct in the wild and nearly extinct in captivity. This does not change the magnitude of the problem, but there is no point in overstating the problem either. Whether Northern and Southern White Rhinos are actually separate species depends upon whom you talk to.

  • Veronique Greenwood

    @Pat and Gordon, thanks for your sharp eyes–I’ve changed it to read “northern white rhino.”

  • paperpushermj

    Auction them off to the highest bider. If some person or organization spends $10,000,000 to buy the rights for any particular animal they will do what is necessary with the help of the native people to protect it.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

80beats

80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »