"Years, Not Decades" to Growing New, Improved Tissue From Your Own Stem Cells

By Veronique Greenwood | September 15, 2011 12:36 pm

church
Biologist George Church, examining a molecular model.

George Church, the geneticist behind the Personal Genome Project, is envisioning a package deal: get your genome sequenced, and he and his collaborators will develop a line of induced pluripotent stem cells (IPS) from your tissue, so in the future, you’ll be able upgrade your system with organs and tissues bearing both your genes and special extras like genes from centenarians. It’s combining stem cells with gene therapy. In an interview with Church, David Ewing Duncan over at Technology Review asks him to elaborate. Why does he think this science fiction scenario is in our near future?

I don’t think people have fully appreciated how quickly adult stem cells and sequencing and synthetic biology have progressed. They have progressed by orders of magnitude since we got [induced pluripotent stem cells]…

Let’s use stem cells in bone marrow as an example. They are easy to use and to get to work when you implant them in bone marrow. You might one day have three choices. You can have bone marrow [1] from someone else that is matched to you, or [2] that is from you, or [3] bone marrow that is matched to you and comes to you, but is better than you. This better bone marrow might be [engineered to be] resistant to one virus, or to all viruses. It could have a bunch of alleles that you picked out of super centenarians, alleles that you have reason to believe are at least harmless and possibly helpful…And you will be able to do that for almost every stem cell population. Some of them are a little bit harder to replace, though.

IPS cells have already been used to grow an entire mouse from nearly scratch, he points out, and many crucial experiments have already been performed in rodents, so for human testing, “we’re talking about years, not decades,” he says. “It’s shorter than the Human Genome Project [which took 13 years], not less expensive, but definitely shorter.”

And how will this catch on? Here, Church shows that he understands the dynamics of translational medicine and the media very well:

The only way people are going to get this is through some brave soul. It will start with a sick person, and they will end up getting well, possibly more well than before they got sick. So you didn’t just correct the sickness, you actually did more. And they’ll give testimonials, and someone from the New York Times will interview them, and tell this appealing anecdote.

With that, they’ll be off and running.

Image courtesy of Steve Jurvetson / flickr

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Health & Medicine
  • http://www.holgentech.com Andras Pellionisz

    George is absolutely right – every paradigm-shift hinges on brave souls. We have seen it in the Internet Boom (Jim Clark was the first to make a difference). The “Jim Clark”-s of the 2nd Stage of Genome Revolution (after “sequencing” is already an established business) genome analytics, including the understanding of genome regulation, with an emphasis on omnipotent (without de novo methylation) stem cells, are already named – to some extent. Mr. & Mrs. Eli Broad ($600 M for the Broad Institute) is one, Andy Grove (uncounted $ M for Parkinson’s) is another. If the rumor is correct (?) Steve Jobs may have been a $150 M donor to Cancer R&D at UCSF. There is history to be made here – and it will happen.

  • http://none pat hill

    I anxiously read every article about stem cells helping in the near future. I have a grandson with aortic stenosis as well as a dear friend who has it and has lived 2 yrs beyond her “projected death date” . George W Bush delayed much of the stem cell research for 8 yrs. I have a hard time forgiving him.

    Pat Hill

  • http://charter.net kenneth maxson

    Pat Hill you are so right. I will never forgive bush and the ‘moral’? republicans either. I lost my wife to diabetes. I don’t know if stem cell research would have helped her or not, and now I never will. The reason I am writing this is that if we want this and other research to continue we must make sure these misguided people never get elected to positions of power again. They still want to kill all scientific research. I see shades of the dark ages if they win.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

80beats

80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »