<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Did Australopithecines Sound Like? More &quot;Duh&quot; Than &quot;Ugg&quot;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/11/28/what-did-australopithecines-sound-like-more-duh-than-ugg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/11/28/what-did-australopithecines-sound-like-more-duh-than-ugg/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/11/28/what-did-australopithecines-sound-like-more-duh-than-ugg/#comment-30598</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 14:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=33568#comment-30598</guid>
		<description>Yeah, American Southerners don&#039;t distinguish between the short e and i sounds. We pronounce pen and pin, tin and ten exactly alike. I&#039;ve tried making the short e sounds in those words and I end up just saying pan and tan. Are we Australopithecus afarensis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, American Southerners don&#8217;t distinguish between the short e and i sounds. We pronounce pen and pin, tin and ten exactly alike. I&#8217;ve tried making the short e sounds in those words and I end up just saying pan and tan. Are we Australopithecus afarensis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iain</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/11/28/what-did-australopithecines-sound-like-more-duh-than-ugg/#comment-30595</link>
		<dc:creator>Iain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 22:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=33568#comment-30595</guid>
		<description>So if duh was amongst the first words I doubt it would have been long before Hey duh!  caught on. And of course the valley girl no duh must have been some hot slang thrown around by the preteens. The more it changes the more it stays the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if duh was amongst the first words I doubt it would have been long before Hey duh!  caught on. And of course the valley girl no duh must have been some hot slang thrown around by the preteens. The more it changes the more it stays the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Dodd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/11/28/what-did-australopithecines-sound-like-more-duh-than-ugg/#comment-30594</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Dodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 02:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=33568#comment-30594</guid>
		<description>Sounds just like modern US teenagers... only a couple of vowel sounds emitted, primarily &quot;uh&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds just like modern US teenagers&#8230; only a couple of vowel sounds emitted, primarily &#8220;uh&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kamran the great</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/11/28/what-did-australopithecines-sound-like-more-duh-than-ugg/#comment-30593</link>
		<dc:creator>kamran the great</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 23:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=33568#comment-30593</guid>
		<description>@ g wilkins ... was your friend a new zealander?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ g wilkins &#8230; was your friend a new zealander?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G Wilkins</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/11/28/what-did-australopithecines-sound-like-more-duh-than-ugg/#comment-30592</link>
		<dc:creator>G Wilkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 17:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=33568#comment-30592</guid>
		<description>Actually &quot;ten&quot; and &quot;tin&quot; can be hard to tell apart among us modern humans as well.  A friend once said to me, &quot;Look at the tint outside.&quot;
&quot;Tint?&quot;
&quot;The big white thing on the lawn.&quot;
&quot;You mean the tent?&quot;
&quot;That&#039;s what I said!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually &#8220;ten&#8221; and &#8220;tin&#8221; can be hard to tell apart among us modern humans as well.  A friend once said to me, &#8220;Look at the tint outside.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;Tint?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;The big white thing on the lawn.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;You mean the tent?&#8221;<br />
&#8220;That&#8217;s what I said!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Great Ape</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/11/28/what-did-australopithecines-sound-like-more-duh-than-ugg/#comment-30591</link>
		<dc:creator>Great Ape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=33568#comment-30591</guid>
		<description>Hi Michelle, they&#039;re not proposing that Australopithecus afarensis had limited communication abilities, just that they communicated using a particular range of vocalisations rather than another particular range of vocalisations. Generally, it would be regarded in the discipline that the other great apes (especially chimpanzees) have good communication abilities, with chimps and gorillas in captivity able to use sign language and glyph based communication, as well as other types of body language and animal communication. Human ancestors or near ancestors, such as the Australopithecines can certainly be expected to have had as good, or probably better, communication abilities than chimpanzees, so this is really an exploration into what type of voice they had.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Michelle, they&#8217;re not proposing that Australopithecus afarensis had limited communication abilities, just that they communicated using a particular range of vocalisations rather than another particular range of vocalisations. Generally, it would be regarded in the discipline that the other great apes (especially chimpanzees) have good communication abilities, with chimps and gorillas in captivity able to use sign language and glyph based communication, as well as other types of body language and animal communication. Human ancestors or near ancestors, such as the Australopithecines can certainly be expected to have had as good, or probably better, communication abilities than chimpanzees, so this is really an exploration into what type of voice they had.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Maine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/11/28/what-did-australopithecines-sound-like-more-duh-than-ugg/#comment-30590</link>
		<dc:creator>James Maine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=33568#comment-30590</guid>
		<description>So the Simpsons had it correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the Simpsons had it correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/11/28/what-did-australopithecines-sound-like-more-duh-than-ugg/#comment-30589</link>
		<dc:creator>megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=33568#comment-30589</guid>
		<description>Also which hominid ancestor had the FOXP2 adaptation that is found to linked to modern speech and talking. That parrots have been found to have a version which could explain their ability to use their tongues so well to mimic humans and make calls and noises for communication to one another.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also which hominid ancestor had the FOXP2 adaptation that is found to linked to modern speech and talking. That parrots have been found to have a version which could explain their ability to use their tongues so well to mimic humans and make calls and noises for communication to one another.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/11/28/what-did-australopithecines-sound-like-more-duh-than-ugg/#comment-30588</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 01:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=33568#comment-30588</guid>
		<description>Considering how complex the communication abilities of animals are, I suspect the scientists are once again over-simplifying the abilities of human ancestors...their paradigm is limited by pre-conceptions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering how complex the communication abilities of animals are, I suspect the scientists are once again over-simplifying the abilities of human ancestors&#8230;their paradigm is limited by pre-conceptions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
