<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Atmospheric Remnants of Nuclear Tests Reveal Antarctica&#8217;s Tiny &#8220;Old-Growth Forests&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/11/30/atmospheric-remnants-of-nuclear-tests-reveal-antarcticas-tiny-old-growth-forests/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/11/30/atmospheric-remnants-of-nuclear-tests-reveal-antarcticas-tiny-old-growth-forests/</link>
	<description>80beats is DISCOVER&#039;s news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day&#039;s most compelling topics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 06:56:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry Johnstone.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/11/30/atmospheric-remnants-of-nuclear-tests-reveal-antarcticas-tiny-old-growth-forests/comment-page-1/#comment-2809304</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Johnstone.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 02:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=33601#comment-2809304</guid>
		<description>A mass of concentrated earthly material perennially rotating on its axis will not accumulate an accretion of BRYOPHYTIC vegetation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A mass of concentrated earthly material perennially rotating on its axis will not accumulate an accretion of BRYOPHYTIC vegetation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Morris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/11/30/atmospheric-remnants-of-nuclear-tests-reveal-antarcticas-tiny-old-growth-forests/comment-page-1/#comment-2808507</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 01:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=33601#comment-2808507</guid>
		<description>Although its worth noting that atoms probably move in and out of the plant much faster than 1/second, just with a net gain less than that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although its worth noting that atoms probably move in and out of the plant much faster than 1/second, just with a net gain less than that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Main</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/11/30/atmospheric-remnants-of-nuclear-tests-reveal-antarcticas-tiny-old-growth-forests/comment-page-1/#comment-2804186</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Main</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=33601#comment-2804186</guid>
		<description>Chris: Thanks for the comment. As you probably realize I meant &quot;glacial&quot; in the more colloquial sense, meaning &quot;very slow.&quot; But it is worth noting that this is way slower than glaciers actually move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris: Thanks for the comment. As you probably realize I meant &#8220;glacial&#8221; in the more colloquial sense, meaning &#8220;very slow.&#8221; But it is worth noting that this is way slower than glaciers actually move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2011/11/30/atmospheric-remnants-of-nuclear-tests-reveal-antarcticas-tiny-old-growth-forests/comment-page-1/#comment-2803611</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=33601#comment-2803611</guid>
		<description>&lt;I&gt;On average these mosses grow at the glacial speed of 1 millimeter per year&lt;/I&gt;

Glaciers move faster than 1 mm/year.  Heck even the continental plates move around 1 cm/year or more.  Mount Everest is rising around 4 mm/year. 

For fun let&#039;s assume you were piling atoms one on top of another and doing this at 1 atom/second.  Each atom has a diameter ~0.2 nm
(0.2*10^-9)(3600)(24)(365.25) = 6.3 * 10^-3 m = 6.3 mm.

 Just to put in perspective how slow that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>On average these mosses grow at the glacial speed of 1 millimeter per year</i></p>
<p>Glaciers move faster than 1 mm/year.  Heck even the continental plates move around 1 cm/year or more.  Mount Everest is rising around 4 mm/year. </p>
<p>For fun let&#8217;s assume you were piling atoms one on top of another and doing this at 1 atom/second.  Each atom has a diameter ~0.2 nm<br />
(0.2*10^-9)(3600)(24)(365.25) = 6.3 * 10^-3 m = 6.3 mm.</p>
<p> Just to put in perspective how slow that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-05-24 07:01:25 -->
