Cracking Open the Neanderthal Personality

By Valerie Ross | January 19, 2012 10:05 am

Over the past few years, several studies have illuminated some of what happened during the brief period when modern humans and Neanderthals overlapped in Europe, with genetic analyses showing that the two groups interbred tens of thousands of years ago (though not frequently) and ancient remains suggesting that modern humans fought and—more controversially—ate their prominent-browed contemporaries.

It seems that humans and Neanderthals made occasional love and intermittent war, but what were those interludes of interaction actually like? What was going on inside those distinctive crania? It’s a tricky question to answer—behavior doesn’t fossilize—but anthropologist Thomas Wynn and psychologist Frederick L. Coolidge combine genetic and anthropological evidence with a healthy dose of well-informed speculation to offer an intriguing picture of how Neanderthals may have lived, thought, felt, and acted.

Wynn & Coolidge have a new book out on the subject, and they share a condensed version of their theory at New Scientist, offering answers to such questions as whether Neanderthals had a sense of humor (slapstick yes, subtleties no) and how their cognitive abilities compared to ours (less creativity and short-term memory, more learning by observation). And as for whether those bellicose and amorous interspecies overtures had to be conducted in pantomime, the researchers point to evidence suggesting that Neanderthals could speak—though if we could understand them, or they us, remains a mystery.

Overall, the portrait they paint of Neanderthals is an impressive, if not always flattering, one:

Jo or Joe Neanderthal would have been pragmatic, capable of leaving group members behind if necessary, and stoical, to deal with frequent injuries and lengthy convalescence. He or she had to be risk tolerant for hunting large beasts close up; they needed sympathy and empathy in their care of the injured and dead; and yet were neophobic, dogmatic and xenophobic.

Read the rest at New Scientist.

Image: iStockphoto

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Human Origins
  • Cathy

    Once again, Jean Auel was pretty darn close.

  • JMW

    Jo or Joe Neanderthal would have been pragmatic, capable of leaving group members behind if necessary, and stoical, to deal with frequent injuries and lengthy convalescence…neophobic, dogmatic and xenophobic.

    Hm. Perhaps we should start testing the religious right for neanderthal genes. :)

  • Tim

    JMW neanderthal DNA is present in all humans except Africans.

  • Suz

    Do all humans have the same personality? The same strengths? Weaknesses? Point of views? Dogs? Cats? There are things that are similar about us, but we all possess the things that make us unique. It is doubtful that Neanderthals were an ancient representation of the Borg.

  • LSB

    JMW is supported by the fact that Americans of African descent VERY RARELY vote Republican.

  • http://discovermagazine.com Iain

    maybe neanderthals were just cro-magnans on steroids.
    Look at those 1960’s East German female olympic teams or Arnold Swartzneggar in his prime.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

80beats

80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »