Could Bird Flu Be a Weapon? Dutch Law May Keep Flu Research Bottled Up

By Sarah Zhang | April 16, 2012 3:00 pm

virus

Update 4/17: The paper’s author, Dutch virologist Ron Fouchier, has announced that he plans on resubmitting his paper to Science without an export permit, regardless of what Dutch authorities decide. Read more at Nature News

Publication of the controversial mutant avian flu papers have hit yet another roadblock. In March, a US advisory panel reversed its prior decision to take out experimental details from two reports about research that seemed to turn the H5N1 bird flu virus into a more virulent and deadly form. Under the original decision, some redacted information would have been available only to accredited researchers.

But in a new, international twist, one of the papers is encountering another obstacle: NPR reported that the Netherlands-based team behind one of the studies is being stifled by Dutch law, which limits the export of technology that could be weaponized. So now there are two main questions about whether the flu research would be published for all to see: how dangerous the virus is, and whether the Dutch law would apply to this research.

Humans, This Mutant H5N1 Virus Will Not Kill You

Last year, two research teams submitted papers that showed how H5N1 could be made contagious between ferrets, which are the best stand-in for humans when it comes to flu research. (The wild H5N1 virus only spreads from bird to human, so an airborne human-to-human virus could be much deadlier in the hands of bioterrorists.) Nature accepted one paper from a team at the University of Wisconsin, and Science accepted the paper from a team led by Ron Fouchier at Erasmus Medical Center in the Netherlands. In November, Fouchier said the mutant H5N1 is “probably one of the most dangerous viruses you can make,” which predictably created a media storm. The potential publication of these papers had been up in the air for the past few months.

(For comprehensive background information, check out this excellent primer at Nature News or this write-up of why the US National Science Advisory Biomedical Board reversed its decision to limit access to the flu findings, both by Discover Blogger Ed Yong.)

The two teams used different techniques; Fouchier’s Science study was more ominous in that his mutant H5N1 virus killed the ferrets—but only if the virus was directly implanted into the ferret’s trachea or nasal tissue. As an airborne disease, it was not deadly, but this distinction was not clarified until March. The US advisory board seems to have reversed its previous decision based on some new evidence, reports Yong, but what that evidence actually is will have to wait until publication…if that ever happens.

Bureaucratic Limbo

Because of the original decision to give the information only to accredited reseachers, according to the NPR report, Dutch export laws on potential weapon technology have kicked in:

“The more complex part of export controls is when it comes to information, rather than equipment,” says Alice Gast, president of Lehigh University, who recently co-chaired an expert panel that examined how these laws affect science.

Information produced by basic research is normally exempt, says Gast, who explains that “the fundamental research exemption is valid as long as you are freely and openly sharing the results of the research.”

But if researchers agree to limit access, for whatever reason, that exemption no longer applies.

Even when the US advisory panel met to discuss the papers, “special export licenses had to be obtained from the US and Dutch governments so the international experts at the meeting could read new versions of the research reports—and they only could see paper copies that they then had to return.” Fouchier himself has confirmed that the export law is preventing him from talking about his research or  submitting a revised manuscript to Science. He is supposed to meet with the Dutch government on April 23 to discuss whether his paper requires an export permit.

Virus image via Shutterstock / sgame

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Health & Medicine, Top Posts
  • julianpenrod

    And what if one of the things the “researchers” discover is a simple way to combat the effects of the virus? Letting that out would certainly hinder the New World Order’s use of the strain in the planned Muslim genocide! So Dutch law, then, would require that people who may contract the disease and might not be able to afford the frauds “doctors” call “medicine” not be permitted tom know how to cuire themselves!
    But, then, maybe H5N1 develops in a way utterly alien to what “evolution” prescribes and what the NWO wants to avoid is people getting this potent pieve of evidence that all of “evolutuion” is a swindle!

  • J Gibs

    @julianpenrod: I am about to throw a dictionary at your face.

  • R Boyle

    @julianpenrod I think you may need to see a psychiatrist about these severe paranoid delusions and your fear of a vast all encompassing conspiracy. It could be a sign of much more severe mental health issues.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

80beats

80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »