UK Officials: Government-Funded Research Must Be Made Available Open Access

By Veronique Greenwood | July 16, 2012 1:04 pm

paywall
Paywalls keep the public from seeing publicly funded research.

A huge proportion of scientific research is funded by governments. But a lot of publicly funded research either never gets published, or winds up behind a journal’s paywall, so you have to buy a subscription or be affiliated with a university to read it.

Now, the UK has announced that all research funded by its main grant-funding bodies must, within six months of being published, be made available “open access,” meaning that anyone can read it.

A few months ago we wrote about how many federally funded clinical trials in the US are never published at all, leading to a gap in the publicly available knowledge about drugs. Though accepting federal funding means agreeing to list your paper on the Pub Med database within 12 months of publishing, there are no real rules in the US about when publishing should happen, and as yet there are no requirements about making such research freely available.

This new UK regulation doesn’t address the issue of government-funded research that goes unpublished. But making what is published available for free is a big step towards making research the public pays for available to the public.

The regulation is in response to a growing desire among scientists and laypeople for research to be available to anyone who wants it. The rule affects about $4.35 billion worth of research funding annually, so we’ll be seeing plenty more open access papers in the next few years.

[via The Scientist]

 

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Uncategorized
  • Kaviani

    That’s awesome, but not as free as it sounds. Not ALL federally funded research, just those funded by the UKRC grants. According to this 2005 article, a third of all public research spending comes from the Ministry of Defence, not these 7 Councils.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2005/jan/20/highereducation.science

    Any current figures? I’m not a brit, so I’m sorta clueless on what entities to research beyond their news sources.

  • http://www.nature.com/news Richard Van Noorden

    Kaviani, UK science minister David Willetts seems very optimistic that other agencies could follow the UKRC. For total (public) research spending, check out the stats here http://sciencecampaign.org.uk/?page_id=1954

  • http://A.O.L.com Richard Tansey

    Im reading some of you project’s.Ammonia ratio to nicotene for safe amounts.Read your testing for hydrogen cyanide and ratio for safety ammounts.Call me crazy, but when i hear hydrogen cyanide,i think of the gas chameber.An spending all that money to find what is already known as far as ammonia an nicotene.Im so glad your finantionaly secure .This is the most insane thing i have ever heard,i hear arsonic, and i hear poison and your giving safe ratio’s .Why dont you look for cancer cure, i already know how to stop it from starting. I suggest randon drug testing, because your nut’s

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

80beats

80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »