Discovered: The First Binary Star System With Multiple Planets

By Sophie Bushwick | August 29, 2012 12:52 pm

Kepler-47
Artist’s rendering of binary system Kepler-47, with outer planet Kepler-47c
in the foreground and inner planet Kepler-47b in the bottom right corner

Growing up in a binary star system can be tough. As the system’s two suns orbit each other, they exert strong gravitational pressures capable of pushing away young planets or sending them careening into one another. It wasn’t until last year that astronomers found the first evidence of a world orbiting two stars. Now new data has revealed that the binary system Kepler-47 goes one step further: it contains not one but two planets.

The new discovery, published in the journal Science, proves that despite the challenging environment, a multi-planet system can form around two stars. The inner planet, Kepler-47b, orbits the central stars—a Sun-like one with a smaller companion—every 49.5 days. The outer planet, Kepler-47c, has a radius 4.6 times bigger than Earth’s, a year of about 303 Earth days, and an orbit located in the habitable zone where liquid water could exist on the planet’s surface.

What’s most interesting about this discovery is the challenge it poses to the current theory about how planets develop. According to the nebular hypothesis, disks of dust form around a star, and within that disk, a combination of small collisions and gravity eventually pulls the dust together into planets. But in a binary system, the pull from two stars and their tendency to smash planets into one another would make the process much more complicated. In light of these findings, astronomers may need to revise their understanding of how planets form, especially in systems where two stars are throwing their weight around.

Image courtesy of NASA/JPL-Caltech/T. Pyle

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Space
  • http://tabbylulham.com Tabby

    A real life Tatooine! Cool!

  • Jeff

    Given enough trials, the highly improbable becomes inevitable. One or even a handful of instances doesn’t invalidate the current hypothesis. Point being we are sometimes too eager to assume significance in an unusual discovery instead of just attributing it to statistics.

    Will be interesting to see the results as they analyze more stars.

  • TheCritic

    That’s true Jeff, but considering that the current hypothesis is more actually a theory based off previous study and evidence that suggest it should be highly improbable. It’s actually more probable that we’re wrong since we haven’t studied that many systems comparably. We shouldn’t even be finding it as often as one time already, given that we’ve only been looking for a few decades.

  • Gar

    Luke is probably wondering what the excitement is all about.

  • SunnyD

    Is it by any chance called Zeta Reticuli?

    Just kidding.

  • danny life

    anything that can happen will happen.

  • Ashar Zubair

    This is an amazing Universe, it reveals itself to us, human beings, bit by bit, reminding us our insignificance.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

80beats

80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »