<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Harvest Uranium from the Ocean</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2012/09/18/how-to-harvest-uranium-from-the-ocean/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2012/09/18/how-to-harvest-uranium-from-the-ocean/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Apr 2013 21:34:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Too</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2012/09/18/how-to-harvest-uranium-from-the-ocean/#comment-34255</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Too</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 23:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=39965#comment-34255</guid>
		<description>At least it&#039;s simple (or seems to be)!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least it&#8217;s simple (or seems to be)!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosemary Turpin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2012/09/18/how-to-harvest-uranium-from-the-ocean/#comment-34254</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosemary Turpin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 21:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=39965#comment-34254</guid>
		<description>I`ve been hearing about thorium too.  I know it`s not perfect, but it`s better than uranium.  I`m sorry, but I`m not qualified to say more than that.  More research is needed on thorium, that`s for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I`ve been hearing about thorium too.  I know it`s not perfect, but it`s better than uranium.  I`m sorry, but I`m not qualified to say more than that.  More research is needed on thorium, that`s for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2012/09/18/how-to-harvest-uranium-from-the-ocean/#comment-34253</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 18:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=39965#comment-34253</guid>
		<description>Tony: I&#039;m sure utilities will love operating reactors in which radioactive high temperature molten salts circulate in the pipes.  Oh, and I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll also love operating online reprocessing equipment.

Or maybe they&#039;ll just say &quot;how nice; how about someone else work out all the kinks in that, mkay?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tony: I&#8217;m sure utilities will love operating reactors in which radioactive high temperature molten salts circulate in the pipes.  Oh, and I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll also love operating online reprocessing equipment.</p>
<p>Or maybe they&#8217;ll just say &#8220;how nice; how about someone else work out all the kinks in that, mkay?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony Mach</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2012/09/18/how-to-harvest-uranium-from-the-ocean/#comment-34252</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Mach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 12:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=39965#comment-34252</guid>
		<description>Two things: Thorium and LFTR.

Enough said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things: Thorium and LFTR.</p>
<p>Enough said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timbebinder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2012/09/18/how-to-harvest-uranium-from-the-ocean/#comment-34251</link>
		<dc:creator>timbebinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2012 00:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=39965#comment-34251</guid>
		<description>Ummmmmmmmmmmm... haven&#039;t we been here before with gold?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummmmmmmmmmmm&#8230; haven&#8217;t we been here before with gold?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2012/09/18/how-to-harvest-uranium-from-the-ocean/#comment-34248</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=39965#comment-34248</guid>
		<description>Rabidmob: the utility of breeder reactors for destroying nuclear waste is overstated.   They would address only actinides, not fission products, and would require a very large number of these more expensive reactors to handle the waste stream.   If we do not face a fuel shortage, it&#039;s much easier and cheaper to just not go to all the expense of reprocessing (with its inevitable contamination and voluminous waste stream) and  let spent fuel cool in sealed dry casks for centuries, or even millenia.

Personally, I expect by that time waste actinidies will be more easily disposed of in space, instead of dangerously down here on Earth by transmutation.   Fortunately, waiting a long time doesn&#039;t foreclose any options.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rabidmob: the utility of breeder reactors for destroying nuclear waste is overstated.   They would address only actinides, not fission products, and would require a very large number of these more expensive reactors to handle the waste stream.   If we do not face a fuel shortage, it&#8217;s much easier and cheaper to just not go to all the expense of reprocessing (with its inevitable contamination and voluminous waste stream) and  let spent fuel cool in sealed dry casks for centuries, or even millenia.</p>
<p>Personally, I expect by that time waste actinidies will be more easily disposed of in space, instead of dangerously down here on Earth by transmutation.   Fortunately, waiting a long time doesn&#8217;t foreclose any options.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabidmob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2012/09/18/how-to-harvest-uranium-from-the-ocean/#comment-34247</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabidmob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 17:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=39965#comment-34247</guid>
		<description>@Paul

I&#039;m not sure why that&#039;s particularly a good thing. My understanding is that breeder reactors more thoroughly expend their fuel leaving less nuclear waste.

However personally I&#039;m a proponent orbital solar installations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Paul</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure why that&#8217;s particularly a good thing. My understanding is that breeder reactors more thoroughly expend their fuel leaving less nuclear waste.</p>
<p>However personally I&#8217;m a proponent orbital solar installations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/2012/09/18/how-to-harvest-uranium-from-the-ocean/#comment-34246</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2012 14:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/80beats/?p=39965#comment-34246</guid>
		<description>The neat thing about this is it almost totally removes the incentive to build breeder reactors, at least for the next few thousand years, even if the entire world&#039;s energy supply were to come from nuclear reactors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The neat thing about this is it almost totally removes the incentive to build breeder reactors, at least for the next few thousand years, even if the entire world&#8217;s energy supply were to come from nuclear reactors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
