To Salvage One Endangered Fish Species, Scientists Consider Breeding It with Another

By Ashley P. Taylor | November 21, 2012 8:42 am

spacing is importantThe Ash Meadows pupfish, which may soon form a hybrid species
with its cousin, the Devils Hole pupfish.

The Devils Hole pupfish is an endangered species whose only natural habitat is Devils Hole, a hot spring at the bottom of a hole 500-feet deep which leads to limestone caverns. The fish is suited to its niche environment, requiring extremely hot water, low oxygen levels, and a particular limestone ledge to spawn on. If University of Colorado conservation biologists have their way, it could be the subject of a conservation experiment, writes Hillary Rosner at Wired: in order to salvage some of dying species’ genes, they want to mate it with another species, creating a vigorous hybrid that could supplant the original species.

Conservationists have been trying to save the Devils Hole pupfish ever since it became endangered in 1967. Beginning in the 70s, they have made three outdoor artificial pools to house a captive population, but through technical mishaps, two of the three populations were wiped out. In the third pool, however, researchers noticed after a few years that some of the fish had fins—characteristics of other pupfish species but not of the Devils Hole pupfish—and suspected that fish of another species must have invaded. A genetic analysis of the fish from their artificial pool revealed that all of the fish had genetic material from the Ash Meadows Amargosa pupfish, which is also endangered, that lived downstream in a natural population. The resulting, finned fish were hybrids, and fertile ones, at that. When researchers transplanted members of the hybrid population to hatcheries, they flourished in captivity, unlike the Devils Hole pupfish, which are notoriously difficult to raise in tanks.

Now conservation biologists want to try to reproduce the accident in order to save the pupfish in its natural habitat, introducing some Ash Meadows Amargosa pupfish to the wild population in Devils Hole in hopes that the added genetic material would lead to a population boost. Using hybridization to preserve the genetic heritage of endangered species is a counterintuitive, though not a completely new idea. Two prior examples involved breeding animals more closely related than these pupfish: in Florida, scientists have mated two kinds of big cat (puma and panther); in Africa, they plan to mate two varieties of white rhino, Northern and Southern.

Not everyone agrees that this is a good idea. According to Wired, some biologists, including E.O. Wilson, argue for keeping wild animals the way they are. But with only 75 Devils Hole pupfish in the spring as of this September, the fear is that they can’t survive in any form without hybridizing.

Fish image courtesy of Bill Debevc/Flickr

CATEGORIZED UNDER: Environment, Living World
  • floodmouse

    Hybrids are generally more vigorous than pedigree animals. Captive breeding programs are a form of artificial selection, which is not always a bad thing, but it sounds like the pupfish have their own ideas about the best way to make babies. I say give the endangered animals their own choice out of the possible available mates, and let nature do its stuff.

  • Mike

    The threat to the Devil’s Hole pupfish is that the groundwater level is dropping due to overextraction of water for agriculture. How would replacing the species with a hybrid change that?

    Also the Devil’s Hole pupfish isn’t “critically endangered”, it’s listed at the lower threat-level “vulnerable”, so hybridizing is not necessary to ‘save’ the fish.

    In short, this project isn’t necessary and doesn’t solve the problem.

  • Matt Pedersen

    From a genetic viability standpoint I can completely understand the concern; the population size is potentially too small for long-term viability. However, the examples provided regarding other “hybrids” to “save a species” are not valid parallels.

    The Florida “hybridizing” was actually the introduction of genetics from the Texas subspecies to the Florida population; we might argue that before European settlement, these populations may have been connected? Even if they weren’t, they are still taxonomic the same species – Puma concolor.- http://content.usatoday.com/communities/sciencefair/post/2010/09/new-blood-perks-up-florida-panther-population/1#.UK8Gloc0V8E

    By the same token, the White Rhino “hybridization” was again, at the time, believed to occur between two subspecies populations of what was at that time considered the same species. – http://www.rhinoconservation.org/2010/06/07/northern-white-rhino-breeding-plan-to-begin-with-hybrids/

    In this case, the taxonomy so far is quite clear – The two species in question ARE just that, considered unique species. I’ll leave the taxonomy to the scientists who determine these things, but it is fair to say that if a new species is introduced, and does successfully hybridize, this does in fact wipe out the Desert Hole Pupfish from a species perspective. You can’t “undo” a hybrid. So really, the question is being framed as “do we have SOME sort of pupfish vs. no pupfish at all”…but no, we are not “saving a species”, we are creating something new instead.

NEW ON DISCOVER
OPEN
CITIZEN SCIENCE
ADVERTISEMENT

Discover's Newsletter

Sign up to get the latest science news delivered weekly right to your inbox!

80beats

80beats is DISCOVER's news aggregator, weaving together the choicest tidbits from the best articles covering the day's most compelling topics.
ADVERTISEMENT

See More

ADVERTISEMENT
Collapse bottom bar
+

Login to your Account

X
E-mail address:
Password:
Remember me
Forgot your password?
No problem. Click here to have it e-mailed to you.

Not Registered Yet?

Register now for FREE. Registration only takes a few minutes to complete. Register now »