Isolated people living in the remote mountains of Cameroon have provided evidence that emotions expressed in Western music are universally recognizable, researchers say. In a new study, researchers found that members of the Mafa tribe could pick out happy, sad, and fearful tunes, despite having no exposure to Western music. Most likely the Mafa were picking up on the same “tone of voice” cues used in human speech, said study team member Stefan Koelsch…. “Western music mimics the emotional features of human speech, using the same melodic and rhythmic structures,” Koelsch said [National Geographic News].
Researchers say the Mafa’s ability to parse the emotions expressed in instrumental classical, jazz, and rock music adds evidence to the theory that music played some role in human evolution. Researchers have proposed numerous hypotheses about why humans make music, ranging from emotional communication to group solidarity. Other scientists, such as Harvard University linguist Steven Pinker, have countered that music is just “auditory cheesecake” with no real evolutionary significance. If music is the result of Darwinian selection, it’s likely that all members of the human species, regardless of their culture, will respond to it in similar ways [ScienceNOW Daily News].
(more…)
A controversial autism treatment has gotten a credibility boost. The first rigorously scientific study of hyperbaric oxygen treatment, in which autistic children breathe in extra oxygen inside a pressurized chamber, found that children who received the treatment showed improvement in social interactions, although researchers note that the small study didn’t examine whether the treatment had long-term effects.
Study leader Dan Rossignol says the use of hyperbaric therapy for autism has been gaining popularity in the US where parents can buy their own hyperbaric chamber if they have a spare $14-17,000 [BBC News]. Other parents take their children to clinics for treatments that usually cost between $120 and $150 per session, and which typically aren’t covered by insurance providers. Rossignol says he expects the findings to generate controversy, and notes that he too was initially very sceptical of the idea but was prompted to do more research after the treatment showed benefits for his two sons who have autism. “We’re certainly not talking about a cure, we’re talking about improvements in behaviour, improving certain functions and quality of life” [BBC News].
(more…)
Researchers have peeked inside the brains of religious people responding to statements about God, and found that there’s no discrete part of the brain that handles religious beliefs–there’s no “God spot,” as other neuroscientists have suggested. The new study found that the neural activity in the subjects’ brains corresponded to brain networks known to have other, nonreligious functions…. “There is nothing segregated or conserved or special about religious beliefs, compared to other belief systems,” [lead researcher Jordan] Grafman said. The networks activated by religious beliefs overlap with those that mediate political beliefs and moral beliefs, he said [The New York Times].
The test subjects were read different types of statements dealing with God and religion while their brains were scanned with an fMRI machine, which measures blood flow to different parts of the brain. The scans showed that religious thoughts “light up” the areas of our brain which have evolved most recently, such as those involved in imagination, memory and “theory of mind” – the recognition that other people and living things can have their own thoughts and intentions [New Scientist].
Some researchers have hypothesized that religious beliefs are a byproduct of the neural networks used in theory of mind, suggesting that humans first evolved to imagine what other people are feeling, even people who aren’t present — and from there it was a short step to positing supernatural beings [Wired].
(more…)
Being treated unfairly in a game triggers the same facial expression as stomach-turning tastes and images, a new study has found, suggesting that the brain mechanism of disgust evolved to help humans avoid not just rotten food, but also immoral behavior.
“Our idea is that morality builds upon an old mental reflex, said study co-author Adam Anderson…. “The brain had already discovered a system for rejecting things that are bad for it. Then it co-opted this and attached it to conditions much removed from something tasting or smelling bad” [Wired News].
(more…)
People may become less vulnerable to bad memories by taking drugs commonly used to treat heart conditions, say Dutch researchers in a paper published in Nature Neuroscience. They believe beta-blocker drugs, usually given to patients following a heart attack or to manage hypertension, could help people suffering from anxiety and other consequences from tramautic experiences.
Led by Merel Kindt, the research team created a fearful memory in 60 subjects by associating a photograph of a spider with an electric shock. A day later, participants who had been given propranolol, a beta-blocker drug, showed less fear when exposed to the image again than did those who were given a placebo. The effect persisted even after the drug was out of the system and the subjects were retested. “The people did not forget seeing the photograph of the spider, but the fear associated with the image was erased” says Kindt [Science News].
This new use for beta-blockers depends on the mental mechanics involved with storing and remembering: Each time a memory is recalled it changes a little, and the new version is recorded in the long-term memory stash via brain chemical fluctuations in a process called reconsolidation. The beta-blockers could interfere with [certain other] brain chemicals, blocking reconsolidation of the emotional component of the memory, but leaving the rest of the memory intact [Science News]. Scientists are excited by the implications that the discovery could have for treating patients dealing with anxiety.
(more…)
When you need to brainstorm ideas for a big project, get yourself to a room that’s painted blue. But when it’s time to proofread the final product, find a red room. Those are the implications of a fascinating new study that measured the effect that colors have on cognition. Researchers found that red can make people’s work more accurate, and blue can make people more creative [The New York Times]. Since people associate red with danger, it primes them to proceed with more caution and diligence, Zhu reasons, while blue’s oceanic connotations put them in a more adventurous mood.
Researcher Juliet Zhu decided to tackle the topic because previous studies had come up with inconsistent findings. Some studies had found that red enhances cognition, for example, while other studies suggest the opposite. Zhu suspected this might be because the work didn’t pay enough attention to which types of cognition were being affected. Red might enhance performance on some tasks, she reasoned, while impairing performance on others [ScienceNOW Daily News].
(more…)
When neuroscientists stare at the brain scans of their research subjects, they may not be getting a clear picture of what’s going on in those brains at one moment in time and how they’re responding to current stimuli–they may also be catching a glimpse of how the brains are preparing to respond to future events.
Scientists using techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) make the assumption that blood flow into a particular brain region is directly linked to the amount of activity in the cells of that region. This is because active cells need more oxygen, and blood ferries it to them [Nature News]. Now, a surprising new study has found that blood rushes to parts of the brain where the neurons haven’t yet jumped into action, and the researchers say this anticipatory response may be skewing the interpretation of fMRI scans.
(more…)
A small study suggests that men are better able to resist food cravings than women, which researchers say could partially explain why more women than men are obese, and why women are more prone to overeating when they’re under emotional stress. In a new brain-scan study, researchers flashed tasty food in front of men and women who hadn’t eaten anything in at least 17 hours. Both were told to fight their hunger, but only men showed a drop in activity in brain regions involved in emotion and motivation [CNN]. However, some researchers say that it’s risky to generalize based on a study with just 23 test subjects.
In the study, which will be published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, researchers engaged their volunteers in a somewhat torturous experiment. They first surveyed the volunteers about their favorite foods: Did they favor pizza, chocolate cake, burgers, or fried chicken? Then they were asked to fast overnight. When they returned to the lab the next day, the subjects got PET brain scans while being subjected to a barrage of craving-inducing stimuli. They looked at pictures of their favorite food, smelled its aroma wafting in from the next room, and even tasted it with cotton swabs placed on their tongues.
(more…)
When two people get knocked off their feet by physical chemistry, their friends may offer this standard glib explanation: “It’s all about the pheromones.” But in fact, 50 years after the term “pheromones” was coined by biologists to refer to the chemical messages passed within many insect and mammal species, researchers still haven’t found proof that humans emit or detect such chemicals. In an essay in Nature [subscription required] marking the 50-year milestone, zoologist Tristram Wyatt sums up the state of the research, and reminds the gullible not to buy any love potions that boast of their pheromone content.
The first studies took place in 1959, when German researchers discovered a chemical called bombykol that’s secreted by female silk moths and that immediately sends males into a mating frenzy. Following that Nobel Prize-winning work, biologists proceeded to find pheromones “across the animal kingdom, sending messages between courting lobsters, alarmed aphids, suckling rabbit pups, mound-building termites and trail-following ants. They are also used by algae, yeast, ciliates and bacteria” [Wired News], Wyatt writes. Pheromones have been found to play a part not just in mating rituals, but also battles for dominance, warnings about approaching danger, and cooperative behavior.
(more…)
The so-called “love hormone” oxytocin, which is linked to a mother’s tender feelings for her child and long-term devotion between mates, may play a more general role in promoting the social cohesion of a group. In a small new study, researchers found that volunteers who got an oxytocin boost were better able to recognize faces they had seen the day before than people who got a placebo, but were no better at recognizing landscapes and and sculptures that they’d previously viewed.
The results are “striking,” says psychologist Thomas Insel, director of the National Institute of Mental Health in Bethesda, Maryland. Insel and colleagues have [previously] shown that oxytocin improves the ability of mice to recognize other mice, … but he notes that this is the first time such a specific effect has been seen in humans. The research “supports the notion that social memory is a unique form of memory, biologically distinct from general object memory,” he says [ScienceNOW Daily News].
(more…)
Playing the absorbing video game Tetris immediately after a traumatic experience could reduce the most jarring symptom of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), the flashbacks in which the distressing memory invades the brain. In an odd new study, researchers showed volunteers ugly images of nasty accidents, crushed-up skulls and bloody entrails from various sources. Then they asked half of them to play Tetris. While the other half apparently did nothing…. The Tetris players apparently suffered significantly fewer nasty memories of those ugly images than did those who were left idle [CNET].
The Tetris players may have experienced fewer flashbacks because they were distracted during a crucial window of opportunity, the few hours after the traumatic incident when the brain is consolidating the memory. Says lead author Emily Holmes: “We wanted to find a way to dampen down flashbacks – the raw sensory images of trauma that are over-represented in the memories of those with PTSD. Tetris may work by competing for the brain’s resources for sensory information. We suggest it specifically interferes with the way sensory memories are laid down in the period after trauma and thus reduces the number of flashbacks that are experienced afterwards” [BBC News]. Playing Tetris could be considered a “cognitive vaccine” against flashbacks, Holmes suggested.
(more…)
The facial expressions that register human joy and disappointment may be hard-wired into our brains, according to a new study. To probe the origins of smiles and scowls, psychologist David Matsumoto and his team compared 4,800 photographs, capturing the expressions of sighted and blind judo athletes at medal ceremonies at the 2004 Olympic and Paralympic Games. In each case, the faces of gold and silver medal winning athletes were scrutinised [BBC News].
The researchers found that both the blind and sighted gold medal winners produced joyful smiles known as Duchenne smiles, in which the cheek muscles rise and the muscles around the eyes crease. In contrast, both blind and sighted silver medal winners initially showed sadness, with their mouths turned down, but put on “social smiles” that use only the mouth muscles when they received their medals.
(more…)
In a new study, most people willingly pulled a lever to deliver pain to others when instructed to do so, showing that little has changed in the near half-century since psychologist Stanley Milgram’s famous electric shock experiment. Milgram’s experiment revealed our propensity to do harm when encouraged by authority, a topic of great interest in the post-World War II years. A new iteration of the experiment (with added precautions) revealed that seven out of ten people will give painful electric shocks to another person as part of what they are told is a scientific investigation. “What we found is validation of the same argument—if you put people into certain situations, they will act in surprising, and maybe often even disturbing, ways,” [Reuters] says researcher Jerry Burger.
In the 1961 experiment, Yale University professor Milgram asked volunteers to deliver increasingly strong electric “shocks” to other people, who appeared to be test subjects but were really actors, if they answered certain questions incorrectly. Milgram found that, after hearing an actor cry out in pain at 150 volts, 82.5 percent of participants continued administering shocks, most to the maximum 450 volts [Reuters]. The results, now a fixture in psychology textbooks, suggested that people’s moral attitudes can be suppressed when they’re put in a situation of obedience. Although no actual shocks were delivered and the sounds of agony came from a tape-recording, many of the volunteers suffered stress from the task and replication of the experiments was deemed unethical.
(more…)
When a juror first makes a decision on the guilt of a defendant and then hands down a sentence, two entirely different regions of the brain are involved, a new brain imaging study has shown—and neither is as rational as we might want to believe. Researchers using functional MRI scans found that a brain in the process of making a decision about the guilt of another person looks a lot like the brain of a person deciding whether they themselves have been wronged; what’s more, decisions about punishment are linked to brain regions that process emotions. “Our judicial system based on third-party punishment is usually seen as cold and detached as opposed to … punishment by the victim of a crime,” [study coauthor René] Marois says. The new study shows that emotions play a part in impartial judgment too [Science News].
Judgments of the culpability of another person were linked to activity in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortexes, researchers found; this region has previously been implicated in decisions of morality and fairness, as well as other functions unrelated to the law. When another team temporarily blocked [activity in this region] with a magnet, participants playing a financial game that tests trust failed to punish unfair offers. No-one expected that almost the same cognitive machinery kicks in when impartially making a decision about cheating and when you yourself are cheated [New Scientist], says study coauthor Owen Jones.
(more…)
Dogs have a sense of fairness, and get jealous and upset when several dogs perform a trick but only one is rewarded, a new study has found. “They are clearly unhappy with the unfair situation”, says [lead researcher Friederike] Range. She also suspects that this sensitivity might stretch beyond food to things like praise and attention. “It might explain why some dogs react with ‘new baby envy’ when their owners have a child”, she says [New Scientist].
While some owners may say that they’ve known about the deep emotional lives of their dogs for ages, the new experiments mark the first time a complicated emotion like jealousy has been observed in dogs in a controlled laboratory setting. “We are learning that dogs, horses, and perhaps many other species are far more emotionally complex than we ever realized,” [says] Paul Morris, a psychologist at the University of Portsmouth who studies animal emotions…. “They can suffer simple forms of many emotions we once thought only primates could experience” [Times Online].
(more…)
