Surprise, surprise. An independent analysis of the primate fossil that was unveiled amid extraordinary hype last May has found significant evidence that the lemur-like creature was not a direct ancestor of humans, after all. The 47-million-year old fossil described in May, which was given the scientific name Darwinius masillae and nicknamed Ida, was announced with unrestrained razzmatazz. She was the “eighth wonder of the world”, “our Mona Lisa” and an evolutionary “Rosetta Stone”, according to the researchers who unveiled her…. She was, they said, the “link” between us and the rest of the animal kingdom [The Guardian].
But Ida, who was the subject of both a book and a TV special that were released at the same time as the scientific paper describing the fossil, failed to wow many evolutionary biologists. Says Erik Seiffert, lead researcher of the new study: ”The suggestion that Ida [was]… specifically related to the higher primates, namely monkeys, apes and humans, was actually a minority view from the start. So it came as a surprise to many of us who are studying primate palaeontology” [BBC News].
Seiffert’s new analysis began with his attempt to identify another fossil primate, Afradapis longicristatus, which he found to be a close relation to Darwinius. The researchers then compared 360 specific anatomical features of 117 living and extinct primate species to draw up a family tree [AP]. The analysis showed that both primates are located on an early twig of the branch that produced lemurs, and far from the lineage that spawned monkeys and great apes [Wired.com]. What’s more, the researchers say that both species have no modern descendants.
(more…)
Look into the future and see the women of tomorrow! A new study predicts that future women will be a tad shorter, heavier, and more fertile—that is, if the women who are currently most successful at producing children are any indication. The team studied 2238 women who had passed menopause and so completed their reproductive lives…[and] tested whether a woman’s height, weight, blood pressure, cholesterol or other traits correlated with the number of children she had borne. They controlled for changes due to social and cultural factors to calculate how strongly natural selection is shaping these traits [New Scientist].
Their results show that shorter, heavier women tend to have more children, as do women with lower blood pressure and cholesterol. If the mothers pass on these traits for 10 generations, the average woman in 2409 will be 2 centimetres shorter and 1 kilogram [about 2 pounds] heavier than she is today. She will bear her first child about 5 months earlier and enter menopause 10 months later [New Scientist]. A two-centimeter decrease over 400 years may be a modest change, but the researchers say it’s evolution in action. The study will be published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
(more…)
Humans typically feel uneasy when they see a very realistic human-looking robot or computer avatar, a phenomenon called the “uncanny valley” response. According to a new study performed with monkeys, that reaction might have an evolutionary basis.
Researchers hypothesize that the response stems from almost realistic images that signal HUMAN! to us, but then fail to live up to the initial excitement. The uncanny valley response has been documented in humans since the 1970s, and has been blamed for the unpopularity of some CGI films with realistic characters [like The Polar Express and Final Fantasy], and it is touted as the reason Pixar stuck to characters with cartoonish features [New Scientist].
(more…)
The tender interactions between human mothers and their newborn babies may have deep evolutionary roots: a new study found that rhesus macaque monkey mothers engage in strikingly similar behavior with their infants.
The researchers found that the mothers would gaze intently at their newborns, sometimes even taking their baby’s face with their hands and gently pulling it towards them to get an even closer look. They would also engage in “lipsmacking” – an affectionate form of expression, where the macaques rapidly open and close their mouths [BBC News]. Several videos taken by the researchers show that just like human babies, the infant monkeys responded to their mothers by mimicking their facial expressions and returning their stares.
(more…)
Organisms evolve to fit the world around them–but if the changes don’t work out, can a creature reverse the process? Say, for example, an insect originally eats a wide variety of tree leaves, but then evolves to live exclusively on the leaves from one type of tree that is abundant in its habitat; if that tree goes extinct, can the bug reverse course? A new study in Nature sheds some light on such questions, which have perplexed evolutionary biologists for many decades.
More than a century ago, the French–born Belgian palaeontologist Louis Dollo proposed that evolution cannot retrace its steps to restore a lost trait — an idea that has remained controversial [Nature News]. So researchers set out to test “Dollo’s Law” on the molecular level, studying a protein called the glucocorticoid receptor, which binds to the hormone cortisol to regulate the stress response. Study coauthor Joseph Thornton says that at least in this protein’s case, new mutations make it practically impossible for evolution to reverse direction. “They burn the bridge that evolution just crossed” [The New York Times], he says.
(more…)
A feathered dinosaur unearthed in a Chinese quarry has added another solid piece of evidence to the theory that birds descended from dinosaurs. The newly uncovered fossil of the species Anchiornis huxleyi dates from the Late Jurassic period, 151-161 million years ago, and therefore predates the earliest known bird, the Archaeopteryx. Paleontologists say this represents the final proof that dinosaurs were ancestral to birds. “Drawing the tree of life, it’s fairly obvious that feathers arose before Archaeopteryx appears in the fossil record” [BBC News], says paleontologist Michael Benton.
The creature, described in a paper [pdf] in Nature, was covered in the short feathers known as “dino-fuzz,” and had longer feathers on both its forelimbs and its back legs that formed primitive wings. The four-winged dinosaurs also had feathers on their feet and wing-like attachments on the arms and legs. But they could probably only glide, as their plumage was insufficient for powered flight [Nature News].
Related Content:
80beats: New Fossil Suggests That Fuzzy Dinosaurs Were Plentiful
80beats: To Attract Mates, This Dino May Have Shaken a Tail Feather
80beats: “Bizarre” and Fluffy Dino May Have Used Feathers to Attract Mates
Image: Zhao Chuang, Xing Lida. An artist’s rendering of Anchiornis huxleyi.
Call it an evolutionary beta test. About 125 million years ago a dinosaur stalked the world, and this predator had a familiar shape: It stood on strong back legs but had runty forelimbs, had a whip-like tail, and had a disproportionately large head with vicious teeth. But while that sounds like a description of the mighty Tyrannosaurus rex, this beast actually lived 35 million years before T. rex–and it was only 9 feet tall.
The discovery of the new species, which has been named Raptorex kriegsteini, has upended previous theories about how the king of the lizards evolved. Says study coauthor Stephen Brusatte: “The thought was these signature Tyrannosaurus features evolved as a consequence of large body size…. They needed to modify their entire skeleton so they could function as a predator at such colossal size” [The New York Times]. Instead, it appears that these features evolved in the early ancestors of T. rex, and that over the epochs the animals simply scaled up.
(more…)
As anyone who has a favorite (and least-favorite) musical artist knows, music can affect our moods. Now it seems it can do the same for cotton-top tamarin monkeys, but only when the music is composed specifically for them, according to a study published in the journal Biology Letters.
Except for one anomaly (they liked Metallica), the monkeys didn’t respond to samples of human music–but the tamarins did respond to cello music that was reminiscent of their natural calls. Cellist and composer David Teie studied recordings of both happy and upset tamarins, and used them as the bases for two different kinds of monkey music. “Basically I took those elements and patterned them the way we do normally with music,” he says. “You repeat them, take them up a [musical] third — you know, using the same kind of compositional techniques we use in human music.” He played the compositions on his cello and then electronically boosted them up three octaves, to a pitch that matched the monkeys’ voices [NPR].
(more…)
The pale-coated deer mouse that makes its home in Nebraska’s Sand Hills prairie has become a poster-mouse for evolution, based on results of a study published in Science.
The rodent typically has dark fur (bottom photo), but one Nebraska group of mice evolved to have lighter fur (top photo) after the Sand Hills formed 8,000 to 15,000 years ago. A lighter coat is advantageous because it allows the animal to blend in with its pale surroundings. But what’s more amazing is that before the formation of the Sand Hills, the deer mouse didn’t even possess the gene that controls coat color in the rodents.
The gene, which is known as Agouti, first appeared in deer mice in the Sand Hills about 4,000 years ago; after that, a mutation occurred that gave rise to the mouse’s sandy fur. “The light gene wasn’t in existence, so the mice had to “wait” until a particular mutation occurred and then selection had to act on that new mutation… It’s a two part process. First the mutation has to occur and second, selection has to increase its frequency” [BBC News], said co-author Hopi Hoekstra.
Related Content:
80beats: Wolves Have Dogs to Thank for Their Dark Fur
80beats: Colorful Pigs May Have Evolved Through Early Farmers’ Love of Novelty
80beats: Couple That Saw Quick Evolution in Darwin’s Finches Wins Big Prize
Image: Emily Kay
A prehistoric armadillo-like animal swung its tail like a baseball bat, taking advantage of the “sweet spot” the same way tennis and baseball players do today, according to a study published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
The tail sported spikes at a specific location that allowed the mammals, known as glyptodonts, to deliver a strong blow while minimizing the risk of harming the tail, the researchers found; spiny-tailed dinosaurs may have used the same mechanism. Known as the “sweet spot” today in sports like baseball, this so-called “center of percussion” helps athletes avoid wrist injuries. “The center of percussion is a point where you can deliver a very powerful blow with a baseball bat, a tennis racket, a sword, an axe or any hand-held implement, but the forces against your hands are almost zero” [Discovery News], said lead author Rudemar Ernesto Blanco. The glyptodont, which went extinct about 8,000 years ago after its emergence about 2.5 million years ago, would have swung its tail about 15 meters per second–about as fast as a modern-day tennis player swinging his or her racket.
(more…)
Survival of the fittest is a brutal game, as a group of robots in a Swiss lab have just demonstrated. When the robots competed for points and only the most successful passed on their computer code (which is analogous to our genetic code), they soon evolved into greedy deception-bots that tried to horde all the points for themselves.
The robots — soccer ball-sized assemblages of wheels, sensors and flashing light signals, coordinated by a digital neural network — were placed by their designers in an arena, with paper discs signifying “food” and “poison” at opposite ends. Finding and staying beside the food earned the robots points…. After each iteration of the trial, researchers picked the most successful robots, copied their digital brains and used them to program a new robot generation, with a dash of random change thrown in for mutation [Wired.com].
(more…)
Imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery not just for humans, but for many primates. In human social interactions, people have an instinctive tendency to copy each other’s body language and mannerisms, and previous studies have shown that such imitation gives rise to friendly feelings. Now a new study has found that capuchin monkeys respond to imitation in the same way, suggesting that the behavior may date back to early in our evolutionary history. The subtle aping may promote the formation of social groups—building cooperation, reducing conflict, and aiding the survival of each individual [Scientific American].
To study the behavior in capuchin monkeys, which live in highly social groups of 30 or 40 individuals, the researchers gave each monkey a Wiffle ball — a lightweight plastic ball with holes in it. Monkeys typically poked the ball with their fingers, put it in their mouths or used it to pound on something. Each monkey was paired up with two human researchers, one that copied their ball-handling skills, and one that did not. When the balls were put away, the monkeys appeared to prefer the company of the like-minded ball handler [Reuters].
(more…)
Rising temperatures in Australia have caused birds on that continent to shrink–some by nearly 4 percent. The findings of a study published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B are the first to show that birds’ sizes are affected by global warming, although this phenomenon previously has been shown in fish and Soay sheep. Scientists postulate that the relationship between a warmer climate and smaller animals may be true for the animal kingdom as a whole.
Temperature has a clear impact on body size; it’s old news among scientists that birds closer to the equator evolved to be smaller than their peers near the poles. One possible explanation for this, called Bergmann’s Rule, is that larger animals conserve heat more efficiently, and this trait is naturally selected for in colder climates, but not in warmer climates. On this basis, scientists have predicted that climate change will affect the way animals vary in size at different latitudes [ABC Science]. The recent research on sheep and fish has corroborated this hypothesis by showing that these animals have become smaller as temperatures have risen.
(more…)
Mosquitoes that have made their way to the Galapagos Islands via tourist planes and boats are threatening the rare native species endemic to the region, according to a study published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
Culex quinquefasciatus, known as the southern house mosquito, can carry diseases dangerous to wildlife, such as avian pox and West Nile virus. Not only have the insects hopped a ride onto the islands, but they’ve also bred with native species once they reach the shore, the study found. That means they pose an ongoing threat to the Galapagos’ rare species and delicate ecosystem, which inspired Darwin’s theory of evolution after he observed the island’s unique array of wildlife. “You only need a single infectious mosquito to initiate a disease cycle,” [co-author Simon] Goodman…[T]he Galapagos “have globally important biodiversity — endemic species found nowhere else in the world,” said Goodman [Telegraph].
(more…)
Using the first known animal instruments, orangutans use leaves to make their voices sound deeper, perhaps thereby tricking predators into thinking the apes are bigger than they really are, according to a study published in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B.
Orangutans produce a noise known as “kiss squeaks” to let predators like snakes and leopards know that they’ve been spotted, and can use their lips and fingers or folded leaves to make the sound. To find out more about why the animals produce the noise, researchers recorded kiss squeaks between 2003 and 2005 near a research station … on the island of Borneo. The team noted whether the sounds had been made with hands, leaves, or lips alone [National Geographic News]. They found that squeaks made using only the lips had a higher pitch than those produced using hands, and that leaf-produced pitches had the lowest frequency and therefore the deepest sound.
(more…)
