<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Martian Meteor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/02/martian-meteor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/02/martian-meteor/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:14:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Allee</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/02/martian-meteor/comment-page-1/#comment-4874</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Allee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2005 05:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/02/martian-meteor/#comment-4874</guid>
		<description>Hey Phil, it would be interesting to know approximate burn difference of a meteor in the earth atmosphere and the martian atmosphere.  In other words, what would the difference in appearance be as well as the meteorite when it hits.  Just curious.  Checking out and if I find anything, I&#039;ll post.
The other BA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Phil, it would be interesting to know approximate burn difference of a meteor in the earth atmosphere and the martian atmosphere.  In other words, what would the difference in appearance be as well as the meteorite when it hits.  Just curious.  Checking out and if I find anything, I&#8217;ll post.<br />
The other BA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tjm220</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/02/martian-meteor/comment-page-1/#comment-4873</link>
		<dc:creator>tjm220</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 16:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/02/martian-meteor/#comment-4873</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t &quot;Sprit&quot; supposed to have a pair of i&#039;s?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t &#8220;Sprit&#8221; supposed to have a pair of i&#8217;s?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/02/martian-meteor/comment-page-1/#comment-4872</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 04:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/02/martian-meteor/#comment-4872</guid>
		<description>Oops! I thought I had checked that. I&#039;ll correct it now. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops! I thought I had checked that. I&#8217;ll correct it now. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/02/martian-meteor/comment-page-1/#comment-4871</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 02:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/02/martian-meteor/#comment-4871</guid>
		<description>Umm... a tiny correction Phil. It was the Spirit rover that took the image, not Opportunity. See http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20040311a.html and scroll about three quarters the way down the page. That page also has an image of the Earth from the surface of Mars which is pretty cool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230; a tiny correction Phil. It was the Spirit rover that took the image, not Opportunity. See <a href="http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20040311a.html" rel="nofollow">http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/press/spirit/20040311a.html</a> and scroll about three quarters the way down the page. That page also has an image of the Earth from the surface of Mars which is pretty cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/02/martian-meteor/comment-page-1/#comment-4870</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 23:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/02/martian-meteor/#comment-4870</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s a cool picture (and a lucky one). One of my favorite pictures is the one containing images of Martian solar eclipses: http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/mer/images.cfm?id=1086</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a cool picture (and a lucky one). One of my favorite pictures is the one containing images of Martian solar eclipses: <a href="http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/mer/images.cfm?id=1086" rel="nofollow">http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/mer/images.cfm?id=1086</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/02/martian-meteor/comment-page-1/#comment-4869</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 23:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/02/martian-meteor/#comment-4869</guid>
		<description>PN!, I&#039;d add Cassini to that list of Things NASA Has Done Right.  I remember how that probe almost got scuttled because of fears that the rocket would explode and release nuclear nastiness that was in the probe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PN!, I&#8217;d add Cassini to that list of Things NASA Has Done Right.  I remember how that probe almost got scuttled because of fears that the rocket would explode and release nuclear nastiness that was in the probe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Project Nothing!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/02/martian-meteor/comment-page-1/#comment-4868</link>
		<dc:creator>Project Nothing!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 20:32:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/02/martian-meteor/#comment-4868</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NASA gets one right&lt;/strong&gt;


	NASA, which routinely crashes $800 million probes into random cosmological objects, deserves heaps of praise for it&#8217;s Mars Rover Mission.
	The two rovers have been kicking all kinds of scientific ass on the surface of Mars for the past year an...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NASA gets one right</strong></p>
<p>	NASA, which routinely crashes $800 million probes into random cosmological objects, deserves heaps of praise for it&#8217;s Mars Rover Mission.<br />
	The two rovers have been kicking all kinds of scientific ass on the surface of Mars for the past year an&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monolithfoo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/02/martian-meteor/comment-page-1/#comment-4867</link>
		<dc:creator>monolithfoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2005 18:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/02/martian-meteor/#comment-4867</guid>
		<description>Awsome! Thank you! Bad Astronomer, Scientists and Engineers on the mars rover project, I KISS you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awsome! Thank you! Bad Astronomer, Scientists and Engineers on the mars rover project, I KISS you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 11:55:16 -->
