<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LED By the Nose</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Read</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5250</link>
		<dc:creator>David Read</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5250</guid>
		<description>Phil,
I stumbled across this thread after a Google search for &#039;problems with LED lighting&#039;. I see that these postings are over a year old but I&#039;m wondering if you or anyone reading this might be able to help me.
I bought a couple of those outrageously expensive LED indoor lights (PAR 30 floodlight). When I installed them, they immediately began to glow - a bit of a surprise since the switch was off. I thought I might have a faulty switch, so I tried another circuit - same thing. I started checking and it seems that, even though the switches are off, the circuits still carry a small amount of voltage (1v - 1.5v). My house is relatively new (8 years old). Was I the recipient of a bad batch of switches? Or is there something else going on here?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,<br />
I stumbled across this thread after a Google search for &#8216;problems with LED lighting&#8217;. I see that these postings are over a year old but I&#8217;m wondering if you or anyone reading this might be able to help me.<br />
I bought a couple of those outrageously expensive LED indoor lights (PAR 30 floodlight). When I installed them, they immediately began to glow &#8211; a bit of a surprise since the switch was off. I thought I might have a faulty switch, so I tried another circuit &#8211; same thing. I started checking and it seems that, even though the switches are off, the circuits still carry a small amount of voltage (1v &#8211; 1.5v). My house is relatively new (8 years old). Was I the recipient of a bad batch of switches? Or is there something else going on here?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Corey Geving</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5249</link>
		<dc:creator>Corey Geving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 20:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5249</guid>
		<description>The other massive advantage of LED lighting is that their light spans a very narrow arc and is directional.  This would help reduce light pollution immensely, in that streetlights and floodlights built with modern white LED tech would focus much more of their light downward, where it is needed, and very little (only whatever gets reflected back from the ground) would be &quot;leaked&quot; back into space.  Which would make a lot of backyard astronomers very happy, since light pollution is the bane of their existence.  Moths and baby sea turtles would also be less likely to be confounded by it.  More light, better spectra, less energy, and better control over where the light goes.  And I&#039;m not even an LED salesman ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other massive advantage of LED lighting is that their light spans a very narrow arc and is directional.  This would help reduce light pollution immensely, in that streetlights and floodlights built with modern white LED tech would focus much more of their light downward, where it is needed, and very little (only whatever gets reflected back from the ground) would be &#8220;leaked&#8221; back into space.  Which would make a lot of backyard astronomers very happy, since light pollution is the bane of their existence.  Moths and baby sea turtles would also be less likely to be confounded by it.  More light, better spectra, less energy, and better control over where the light goes.  And I&#8217;m not even an LED salesman &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Niehof</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5248</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Niehof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5248</guid>
		<description>&lt;!-- spamk    : Comment text: &#039;Phil, you might want to try some full-spectrum CF&#039;s:
http://www.fullspectrumsolutions.com/compact_fluorescent_32_ctg.htm

They&#039;re a bit more expensive but pretty nice. They&#039;ll also still look a bit blue to you; incandescent lighting is very low-temperature compared to daylight.&#039; matched HTTP: --&gt;




Phil, you might want to try some full-spectrum CF&#039;s:
http://www.fullspectrumsolutions.com/compact_fluorescent_32_ctg.htm

They&#039;re a bit more expensive but pretty nice. They&#039;ll also still look a bit blue to you; incandescent lighting is very low-temperature compared to daylight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- spamk    : Comment text: 'Phil, you might want to try some full-spectrum CF's:<br />
<a href="http://www.fullspectrumsolutions.com/compact_fluorescent_32_ctg.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fullspectrumsolutions.com/compact_fluorescent_32_ctg.htm</p>
<p>They&#8217;re a bit more expensive but pretty nice. They&#8217;ll also still look a bit blue to you; incandescent lighting is very low-temperature compared to daylight.&#8217; matched HTTP: &#8211;></p>
<p>Phil, you might want to try some full-spectrum CF&#8217;s:<br />
<a href="http://www.fullspectrumsolutions.com/compact_fluorescent_32_ctg.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fullspectrumsolutions.com/compact_fluorescent_32_ctg.htm</a></p>
<p>They&#8217;re a bit more expensive but pretty nice. They&#8217;ll also still look a bit blue to you; incandescent lighting is very low-temperature compared to daylight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5247</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 05:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5247</guid>
		<description>I use many CFs in the house. My only complaint is that the ones we bought give off a somewhat harsh white light. We&#039;re used to softer tones, I suppose, but if a CF is out there with bettercolor, I&#039;d like to know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use many CFs in the house. My only complaint is that the ones we bought give off a somewhat harsh white light. We&#8217;re used to softer tones, I suppose, but if a CF is out there with bettercolor, I&#8217;d like to know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LarrySDonald</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5246</link>
		<dc:creator>LarrySDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5246</guid>
		<description>Really, it&#039;s entirely possible to make better incandescent  bulbs in terms of durabillity. Usually, they are simply drawn thread of wolfram (tungsten if you&#039;re all US) housed in an atmosphere of Argon to keep it from being oxidized. A theoretically perfect filament would be burning long after you&#039;d dirtnap and couldn&#039;t verify. Even very well made filaments would last much longer then the 750-1000 hours most are rated at (which is taking into account the high restistance and damage with the &quot;cold starts&quot; before reaching normal operating temperature). Optimizing this is mostly economics; as filaments get more refined the price difference is by no means linear. Making a filament that will burn 10% longer doesn&#039;t just cost 10% more but increases faster as percitions go up. Hence, you will hit a limit where it&#039;s cheaper to just make a fresh bulb to replace it rather then go through the trouble of making the first one last. This is further complicated by the market, plenty of people would cheerfully buy an 80 cent bulb that would burn out in less then half the time of a $1.60 or even $1 bulb. This is one of the zillions of paradoxes of humans in general and one of the banes of LEDs and CFs. You can, right now at your local walmart (or other convenience store), buy a CF rated at 20k+ hours for $6  or so, way less then 1/20th of a 1k hour bulb (a typical 1khour bulb should at that rate cost $6/20=30 cent. They&#039;re more then that). Yet, people mostly don&#039;t. If one were to go ahead and install CF tubes instead of regular lightbulb sockets, this would plunge the price/lux/hour even further even including the new equipment and considering the energy cost, well, you guessed it, even further still (hint: It&#039;s not a conincience that most corporations have all CFs in their buildings). It&#039;s really quite insane, most Cfs will break even vs bulbs in less than four months counting investment, lasting power and energy and that&#039;s even without counting the more human &quot;The ammount your wife will bug you to change it will be reduced by 95%&quot;. Do it man, get CFs and be a happier human.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, it&#8217;s entirely possible to make better incandescent  bulbs in terms of durabillity. Usually, they are simply drawn thread of wolfram (tungsten if you&#8217;re all US) housed in an atmosphere of Argon to keep it from being oxidized. A theoretically perfect filament would be burning long after you&#8217;d dirtnap and couldn&#8217;t verify. Even very well made filaments would last much longer then the 750-1000 hours most are rated at (which is taking into account the high restistance and damage with the &#8220;cold starts&#8221; before reaching normal operating temperature). Optimizing this is mostly economics; as filaments get more refined the price difference is by no means linear. Making a filament that will burn 10% longer doesn&#8217;t just cost 10% more but increases faster as percitions go up. Hence, you will hit a limit where it&#8217;s cheaper to just make a fresh bulb to replace it rather then go through the trouble of making the first one last. This is further complicated by the market, plenty of people would cheerfully buy an 80 cent bulb that would burn out in less then half the time of a $1.60 or even $1 bulb. This is one of the zillions of paradoxes of humans in general and one of the banes of LEDs and CFs. You can, right now at your local walmart (or other convenience store), buy a CF rated at 20k+ hours for $6  or so, way less then 1/20th of a 1k hour bulb (a typical 1khour bulb should at that rate cost $6/20=30 cent. They&#8217;re more then that). Yet, people mostly don&#8217;t. If one were to go ahead and install CF tubes instead of regular lightbulb sockets, this would plunge the price/lux/hour even further even including the new equipment and considering the energy cost, well, you guessed it, even further still (hint: It&#8217;s not a conincience that most corporations have all CFs in their buildings). It&#8217;s really quite insane, most Cfs will break even vs bulbs in less than four months counting investment, lasting power and energy and that&#8217;s even without counting the more human &#8220;The ammount your wife will bug you to change it will be reduced by 95%&#8221;. Do it man, get CFs and be a happier human.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: um3k</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5245</link>
		<dc:creator>um3k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 20:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5245</guid>
		<description>Marek, you must take into consideration that LEDs have only been around since the 60&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marek, you must take into consideration that LEDs have only been around since the 60&#8242;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marek</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5216</link>
		<dc:creator>Marek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5216</guid>
		<description>LEDs might be great but the longest burning lightbulb in history is still a traditional one:

http://www.snopes.com/science/lightbulb.asp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LEDs might be great but the longest burning lightbulb in history is still a traditional one:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.snopes.com/science/lightbulb.asp" rel="nofollow">http://www.snopes.com/science/lightbulb.asp</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Darrell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5215</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Darrell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2005 06:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5215</guid>
		<description>LEDs are used in tail and brakelights in the more expensive Cadillacs, BMWs, and Infinitis.  You can buy an LED array to replace your taillights, online, or at places like AutoZone and PepBoys.

It&#039;s a question of engineering that they have not spread farther already.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LEDs are used in tail and brakelights in the more expensive Cadillacs, BMWs, and Infinitis.  You can buy an LED array to replace your taillights, online, or at places like AutoZone and PepBoys.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a question of engineering that they have not spread farther already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DennyMo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5241</link>
		<dc:creator>DennyMo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 19:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5241</guid>
		<description>I just wish the engineers who design those LED traffic lights would put day/night sensors on them, so you don&#039;t go blind when the light turns green at night.  Ouch!!  Other than that, I love them.  It&#039;s taken me a while to get used to seeing LEDs as the primary tail lights in cars.  Incandescent bulbs have a &quot;soft on&quot; quality, the LEDs have a very abrupt &quot;ON&quot; quality.  Nothing wrong, just different.

Another advantage: if one LED fails, the rest of them still work.  It gives you some cushion before you &quot;have&quot; to replace the light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wish the engineers who design those LED traffic lights would put day/night sensors on them, so you don&#8217;t go blind when the light turns green at night.  Ouch!!  Other than that, I love them.  It&#8217;s taken me a while to get used to seeing LEDs as the primary tail lights in cars.  Incandescent bulbs have a &#8220;soft on&#8221; quality, the LEDs have a very abrupt &#8220;ON&#8221; quality.  Nothing wrong, just different.</p>
<p>Another advantage: if one LED fails, the rest of them still work.  It gives you some cushion before you &#8220;have&#8221; to replace the light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5242</link>
		<dc:creator>russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2005 12:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5242</guid>
		<description>Domestic lighting may go straight to huge flat screen that cover every wall and display moving scenery like countryside etc and at the same time provide the equivalent light of a 100w light bulb. If cheap enough the whole house could be walled in tv screens(which I suppose are also LED based).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domestic lighting may go straight to huge flat screen that cover every wall and display moving scenery like countryside etc and at the same time provide the equivalent light of a 100w light bulb. If cheap enough the whole house could be walled in tv screens(which I suppose are also LED based).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terra</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5244</link>
		<dc:creator>Terra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 21:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5244</guid>
		<description>Here is a great resource on LEDs, what you can do with them, what we can expect in the future, and how much they cost.

Don Klipstein&#039;s LED Main Page
http://members.misty.com/don/ledx.html

High efficiency LEDs page
http://members.misty.com/don/lede.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a great resource on LEDs, what you can do with them, what we can expect in the future, and how much they cost.</p>
<p>Don Klipstein&#8217;s LED Main Page<br />
<a href="http://members.misty.com/don/ledx.html" rel="nofollow">http://members.misty.com/don/ledx.html</a></p>
<p>High efficiency LEDs page<br />
<a href="http://members.misty.com/don/lede.html" rel="nofollow">http://members.misty.com/don/lede.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5243</link>
		<dc:creator>Taks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 20:51:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5243</guid>
		<description>on one hand, it is amazing to me that the concept of LEDs is not more widely known, on the other, i suppose my career has spoiled my objectivity in assessing the reasons.  as an electrical engineer, i&#039;ve been working with &quot;blinkies&quot; (marketese for LEDs that customers like) for 10 years.  everyone has seen LEDs, however, in such notable products as the &quot;graphic equalizer&quot; on our cool 80s car stereos.

in general, older LEDs were rather large and not very bright, but worked well enough on a faceplate that you could differentiate on/off.  newer LEDs, however, have become increasingly brighter.  they also come in more than just the standard red and green, with blue, yellow, white et al becoming more and more popular (just looking at a short list at digikey they have &quot;super intensity red&quot;, &quot;super ultra green&quot; and many bi/tri-colored as well).  heck, newer LEDs are bright enough for infiniti to use in their taillights... definitely nifty technology.

taks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>on one hand, it is amazing to me that the concept of LEDs is not more widely known, on the other, i suppose my career has spoiled my objectivity in assessing the reasons.  as an electrical engineer, i&#8217;ve been working with &#8220;blinkies&#8221; (marketese for LEDs that customers like) for 10 years.  everyone has seen LEDs, however, in such notable products as the &#8220;graphic equalizer&#8221; on our cool 80s car stereos.</p>
<p>in general, older LEDs were rather large and not very bright, but worked well enough on a faceplate that you could differentiate on/off.  newer LEDs, however, have become increasingly brighter.  they also come in more than just the standard red and green, with blue, yellow, white et al becoming more and more popular (just looking at a short list at digikey they have &#8220;super intensity red&#8221;, &#8220;super ultra green&#8221; and many bi/tri-colored as well).  heck, newer LEDs are bright enough for infiniti to use in their taillights&#8230; definitely nifty technology.</p>
<p>taks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danigirl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5240</link>
		<dc:creator>Danigirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 15:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5240</guid>
		<description>I was wondering something about LED lights when considering buying LED Christmas lights last December.  Maybe someone can tell me why they are only available in certain colours?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering something about LED lights when considering buying LED Christmas lights last December.  Maybe someone can tell me why they are only available in certain colours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Thompson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5239</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Thompson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 04:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5239</guid>
		<description>While newer traffic lights are LEDs, older ones are still incandescent.  How do they stand up to that many on/off cycles?  Simple - they are never completely off.  Enough current is maintained during the off cycle to keep the filament hot but not hot enough to emit noticable light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While newer traffic lights are LEDs, older ones are still incandescent.  How do they stand up to that many on/off cycles?  Simple &#8211; they are never completely off.  Enough current is maintained during the off cycle to keep the filament hot but not hot enough to emit noticable light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LarrySDonald</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5238</link>
		<dc:creator>LarrySDonald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 03:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5238</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve looked into LEDs for household lighting a few times, but every time they&#039;ve been a bit better but not yet beating CFs. I&#039;m continually amazed at how popular filament bulbs are. CFs have been around for ages, and while the initial investment is a little higher for CFs, even there they are usually cheaper per time unit of operation then filaments and that&#039;s not even counting the energy savings. Even so, seeing a person (as opposed to a company or institution) using all CFs is more of an exception then a rule. I do use a few filament bulbs in areas where they are very prone to being smashed (and thus not likely to last more then a month anyhow) but the rest is CF. Given how few people have even given up filaments, I doubt LEDs are poised to take over anytime soon.

I suppose in one sense I&#039;m less picky; I&#039;m somewhat colorblind and mostly non-artistic so as long as something is bright I could really care less about the spectrum. It could be skewed all over the place and I probably wouldn&#039;t notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve looked into LEDs for household lighting a few times, but every time they&#8217;ve been a bit better but not yet beating CFs. I&#8217;m continually amazed at how popular filament bulbs are. CFs have been around for ages, and while the initial investment is a little higher for CFs, even there they are usually cheaper per time unit of operation then filaments and that&#8217;s not even counting the energy savings. Even so, seeing a person (as opposed to a company or institution) using all CFs is more of an exception then a rule. I do use a few filament bulbs in areas where they are very prone to being smashed (and thus not likely to last more then a month anyhow) but the rest is CF. Given how few people have even given up filaments, I doubt LEDs are poised to take over anytime soon.</p>
<p>I suppose in one sense I&#8217;m less picky; I&#8217;m somewhat colorblind and mostly non-artistic so as long as something is bright I could really care less about the spectrum. It could be skewed all over the place and I probably wouldn&#8217;t notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Siefert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5237</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Siefert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 02:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5237</guid>
		<description>To ByTheWay,

Sunlight is normal.... Halogen lights comes closest in a normal household.
Big hollywood arclights are closer but they are not practical in a normal home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To ByTheWay,</p>
<p>Sunlight is normal&#8230;. Halogen lights comes closest in a normal household.<br />
Big hollywood arclights are closer but they are not practical in a normal home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ByTheWay</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5236</link>
		<dc:creator>ByTheWay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5236</guid>
		<description>The first time I noticed LEDs as traffic lights, I also noticed that only the green and red bulbs were being replaced...not the yellow bulbs.  I figured that they replaced the old bulbs with the new ones when they burned out, but the old yellow bulbs lasted longer.  Well, the yellow light is rarely on...so why not?

Inexpensive, efficient, --bright-- white LEDs are still a ways off -- don&#039;t hold your breath.  Yeah, the light has a different quality to it.  But then again, look carefully at household incandescent lighting -- that orangeish color really gets to me sometimes.  Or the buish color of others.  The fact is, it&#039;s hard to get light that is &quot;normal&quot;...what&#039;s normal, for that matter??

RGB LEDs offer lots or promise in this regard.  Most types of bulbs can be balanced to match, say, sunlight.  But 3-color LED&#039;s can be balanced rather easily (even on the fly, if need be).  For those that need the right color balance for different situations (photographers, for instance), this could be invaluable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first time I noticed LEDs as traffic lights, I also noticed that only the green and red bulbs were being replaced&#8230;not the yellow bulbs.  I figured that they replaced the old bulbs with the new ones when they burned out, but the old yellow bulbs lasted longer.  Well, the yellow light is rarely on&#8230;so why not?</p>
<p>Inexpensive, efficient, &#8211;bright&#8211; white LEDs are still a ways off &#8212; don&#8217;t hold your breath.  Yeah, the light has a different quality to it.  But then again, look carefully at household incandescent lighting &#8212; that orangeish color really gets to me sometimes.  Or the buish color of others.  The fact is, it&#8217;s hard to get light that is &#8220;normal&#8221;&#8230;what&#8217;s normal, for that matter??</p>
<p>RGB LEDs offer lots or promise in this regard.  Most types of bulbs can be balanced to match, say, sunlight.  But 3-color LED&#8217;s can be balanced rather easily (even on the fly, if need be).  For those that need the right color balance for different situations (photographers, for instance), this could be invaluable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Videodrone</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5235</link>
		<dc:creator>Videodrone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 01:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5235</guid>
		<description>Brock is correct in that the light turns on and off 120 times a sec in the US but it is the inrush of current when the filiment is cold that causes the damage
C Crane is now selling LED &quot;light bulbs&quot; but at 35 bucks a pop I&#039;ll wait a while</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brock is correct in that the light turns on and off 120 times a sec in the US but it is the inrush of current when the filiment is cold that causes the damage<br />
C Crane is now selling LED &#8220;light bulbs&#8221; but at 35 bucks a pop I&#8217;ll wait a while</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Siefert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5234</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Siefert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5234</guid>
		<description>To Timothy,

You said:
&quot;You can buy LED Christmas lights. Traditional lights use filaments&quot;

NOT TRUE... traditional Christmas lights use candles.... When I was young we used to... etc. etc. etc......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Timothy,</p>
<p>You said:<br />
&#8220;You can buy LED Christmas lights. Traditional lights use filaments&#8221;</p>
<p>NOT TRUE&#8230; traditional Christmas lights use candles&#8230;. When I was young we used to&#8230; etc. etc. etc&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Project Nothing!  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Edison is so 1900</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5233</link>
		<dc:creator>Project Nothing!  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Edison is so 1900</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2005 00:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5233</guid>
		<description>&lt;!-- spamk    : Moderating pingback spam. --&gt;
&lt;!-- spamk    : URL: www.projectnothing.com/?p=244 matched www.projectnothing.com (non-verified regex) --&gt;
&lt;!-- spamk    : KARMA: -2 --&gt;
&lt;!-- spamk    : Treatment: purgatory --&gt;
[...] 		Phil Plait over at Bad Astronomy has an interesting post about how LED&#8217;s work, and why they might light the future: 	LEDs, though, give off light for a very different reason. Indulge me i [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!-- spamk    : Moderating pingback spam. --><br />
<!-- spamk    : URL: <a href="http://www.projectnothing.com/?p=244" rel="nofollow">http://www.projectnothing.com/?p=244 matched <a href="http://www.projectnothing.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.projectnothing.com</a> (non-verified regex) &#8211;><br />
<!-- spamk    : KARMA: -2 --><br />
<!-- spamk    : Treatment: purgatory --><br />
[...] 		Phil Plait over at Bad Astronomy has an interesting post about how LED&#8217;s work, and why they might light the future: 	LEDs, though, give off light for a very different reason. Indulge me i [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bilateralrope</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5232</link>
		<dc:creator>Bilateralrope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 22:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5232</guid>
		<description>My dad bought an LED torch (can&#039;t remember if it was 1 LED or 3). After going camping with it a few time he wanted t know how much charge was left in the battries (2 AA battries IIRC). It remained on constantly for 3 days before we even noticed it dimming at all.

Sure, the light that it gave off seemed odd, but with that much battery life, its worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My dad bought an LED torch (can&#8217;t remember if it was 1 LED or 3). After going camping with it a few time he wanted t know how much charge was left in the battries (2 AA battries IIRC). It remained on constantly for 3 days before we even noticed it dimming at all.</p>
<p>Sure, the light that it gave off seemed odd, but with that much battery life, its worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bored Huge Krill</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5231</link>
		<dc:creator>Bored Huge Krill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:48:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5231</guid>
		<description>Edward,
I think I agree - but as far as I know the mechanism by which the filament fails is fatigue due to the constant thermal cycling causing plastic deformation of the hot filament each cycle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Edward,<br />
I think I agree &#8211; but as far as I know the mechanism by which the filament fails is fatigue due to the constant thermal cycling causing plastic deformation of the hot filament each cycle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VisionEngineer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5230</link>
		<dc:creator>VisionEngineer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5230</guid>
		<description>I have noticed that LEDs are starting to be used for tail lights and brake lights on trucks.  I can&#039;t recall seing them on any cars yet, but I&#039;m sure they will come.  It seems like it could be a real safety issue since several LEDs could burn out before the light is unusable.  I use LED lighting a lot in my profession and over the years I&#039;ve seen LEDs getting cheaper, bigger, and brighter.  I think they will be used for household lighting eventually, but it may take a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed that LEDs are starting to be used for tail lights and brake lights on trucks.  I can&#8217;t recall seing them on any cars yet, but I&#8217;m sure they will come.  It seems like it could be a real safety issue since several LEDs could burn out before the light is unusable.  I use LED lighting a lot in my profession and over the years I&#8217;ve seen LEDs getting cheaper, bigger, and brighter.  I think they will be used for household lighting eventually, but it may take a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy Gaede</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5229</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy Gaede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 20:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5229</guid>
		<description>You can buy LED Christmas lights.  Traditional lights use filaments and are are not too efficient, even less so than standard filament bulbs.  Also, most of the visible light produced by traditional lights is absorbed by the colored bulbs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can buy LED Christmas lights.  Traditional lights use filaments and are are not too efficient, even less so than standard filament bulbs.  Also, most of the visible light produced by traditional lights is absorbed by the colored bulbs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul West</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/comment-page-1/#comment-5228</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 17:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/06/21/led-by-the-nose/#comment-5228</guid>
		<description>The wilderness sportspeople have been using and following the LED illumination device progression for some time.   A good review of the stuff that is in the marketplace (or soon will be) is here:

http://www.equipped.com/SS_2005_LEDFlashlight_Review-1.htm

I would expect these devices to be migrated rather rapidly into the home market.

Regards,

Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The wilderness sportspeople have been using and following the LED illumination device progression for some time.   A good review of the stuff that is in the marketplace (or soon will be) is here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.equipped.com/SS_2005_LEDFlashlight_Review-1.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.equipped.com/SS_2005_LEDFlashlight_Review-1.htm</a></p>
<p>I would expect these devices to be migrated rather rapidly into the home market.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 12:23:30 -->
