<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Runaway Star</title>
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/08/31/runaway-star/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Community News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Uwe Hermann: Linux Videoblog Clients Roundup</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/08/31/runaway-star/#comment-6551</link>
		<dc:creator>Community News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Uwe Hermann: Linux Videoblog Clients Roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 14:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/08/31/runaway-star/#comment-6551</guid>
		<description>[...] Runaway Star [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Runaway Star [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/08/31/runaway-star/#comment-6550</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2005 08:41:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/08/31/runaway-star/#comment-6550</guid>
		<description>That closing paragraph(s) really made me feel warm inside.

Thanks, Phil.
Keep up the great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That closing paragraph(s) really made me feel warm inside.</p>
<p>Thanks, Phil.<br />
Keep up the great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikipedian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/08/31/runaway-star/#comment-6549</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikipedian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2005 02:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/08/31/runaway-star/#comment-6549</guid>
		<description>Actually I just checked and apparently the Helios probe at slightly more than 70km/s is the fastest manmade object, as it approached the Sun.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helios_probes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually I just checked and apparently the Helios probe at slightly more than 70km/s is the fastest manmade object, as it approached the Sun.</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helios_probes" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helios_probes</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wikipedian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/08/31/runaway-star/#comment-6548</link>
		<dc:creator>Wikipedian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2005 02:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/08/31/runaway-star/#comment-6548</guid>
		<description>Speeds of about 30 km/s should be attainable, the current chemical rockets allowing for about 10 km/s and the remainder from gravitational slingshots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speeds of about 30 km/s should be attainable, the current chemical rockets allowing for about 10 km/s and the remainder from gravitational slingshots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/08/31/runaway-star/#comment-6547</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2005 00:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/08/31/runaway-star/#comment-6547</guid>
		<description>Mendel - OK, we made light bulbs, but we didn't make the photons that travel so fast (we provided the energy for them, but they were made by a piece of hot tungsten).  Besides, photons are not macroscopic.  Generally, if you can see something as a discreet entity without a microscope, it can be considered macroscopic.

BA, a much more lively report than New Scientist (although I read theirs first).  Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mendel - OK, we made light bulbs, but we didn&#8217;t make the photons that travel so fast (we provided the energy for them, but they were made by a piece of hot tungsten).  Besides, photons are not macroscopic.  Generally, if you can see something as a discreet entity without a microscope, it can be considered macroscopic.</p>
<p>BA, a much more lively report than New Scientist (although I read theirs first).  Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mendel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/08/31/runaway-star/#comment-6546</link>
		<dc:creator>Mendel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2005 00:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/08/31/runaway-star/#comment-6546</guid>
		<description>quote "The Sun is orbiting the center of the Galaxy at 200 km/sec (120 miles/sec). Thatâ€™s faster than any man-made macroscopic object has ever moved. No rocket, no hyper-accelerated bullet, nothing we have ever made of any size has gone that fast"


Well let's see, people have made lightbulbs, right? lightbulbs emit light, light travels faster than 200km/sec. We also have particle accelerators, but I guess individual neutrons aren't macroscopic objects :) Where do you draw the line of microscopic object vs macroscopic object? I guess several micrometers? (duh)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>quote &#8220;The Sun is orbiting the center of the Galaxy at 200 km/sec (120 miles/sec). Thatâ€™s faster than any man-made macroscopic object has ever moved. No rocket, no hyper-accelerated bullet, nothing we have ever made of any size has gone that fast&#8221;</p>
<p>Well let&#8217;s see, people have made lightbulbs, right? lightbulbs emit light, light travels faster than 200km/sec. We also have particle accelerators, but I guess individual neutrons aren&#8217;t macroscopic objects <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Where do you draw the line of microscopic object vs macroscopic object? I guess several micrometers? (duh)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob0112358</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/08/31/runaway-star/#comment-6545</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob0112358</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 15:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/08/31/runaway-star/#comment-6545</guid>
		<description>Muchas Gracias, Senior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Muchas Gracias, Senior.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
