<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kablam!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/13/kablam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/13/kablam/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:24:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Caspar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/13/kablam/comment-page-1/#comment-6697</link>
		<dc:creator>Caspar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2005 21:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/13/kablam/#comment-6697</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;d like to see those impact craters in Google Earth take a look at my page (http://www.thinklemon.com/pages/ge/). I&#039;ve put size indicators per crater, so you can compare sizes.

BTW: Vredefort, Sudburry, Manicouagan and Acraman are awesome. To name a few.
BTW2: If I can get my hands on it, I&#039;ll add the &#039;Suspected Earth Impact Sites&#039;. The site is pretty darn slow...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;d like to see those impact craters in Google Earth take a look at my page (<a href="http://www.thinklemon.com/pages/ge/)" rel="nofollow">http://www.thinklemon.com/pages/ge/)</a>. I&#8217;ve put size indicators per crater, so you can compare sizes.</p>
<p>BTW: Vredefort, Sudburry, Manicouagan and Acraman are awesome. To name a few.<br />
BTW2: If I can get my hands on it, I&#8217;ll add the &#8216;Suspected Earth Impact Sites&#8217;. The site is pretty darn slow&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Ferro</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/13/kablam/comment-page-1/#comment-6696</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Ferro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 17:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/13/kablam/#comment-6696</guid>
		<description>Tommy B: I think it might be that the rock there is older (pre-cambrian) and less eroded than other places. Parts of eastern Canada are similar - the geology there is among the oldest in the world. The arctic/subarctic regions of the northern hemisphere have a fortuitous blend of old rock, glaciation and aridity. Other places that have similarly aged rock tend to be in areas that did not experience much glaciation (to remove overlying rock and soil) or are in moist climates - which means the craters tend to erode away.

CJSF</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tommy B: I think it might be that the rock there is older (pre-cambrian) and less eroded than other places. Parts of eastern Canada are similar &#8211; the geology there is among the oldest in the world. The arctic/subarctic regions of the northern hemisphere have a fortuitous blend of old rock, glaciation and aridity. Other places that have similarly aged rock tend to be in areas that did not experience much glaciation (to remove overlying rock and soil) or are in moist climates &#8211; which means the craters tend to erode away.</p>
<p>CJSF</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/13/kablam/comment-page-1/#comment-6693</link>
		<dc:creator>Foley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 01:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/13/kablam/#comment-6693</guid>
		<description>This is a fascinating blog.  I look forward to learning more and more here!  Keep up the great work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a fascinating blog.  I look forward to learning more and more here!  Keep up the great work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy B</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/13/kablam/comment-page-1/#comment-6694</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2005 01:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/13/kablam/#comment-6694</guid>
		<description>Is it just me or are Sweden and Finnland really that dangerous? I had a look at the SEIS map, and there seems to be a huge concentration of impact sites in those two countries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it just me or are Sweden and Finnland really that dangerous? I had a look at the SEIS map, and there seems to be a huge concentration of impact sites in those two countries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hebert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/13/kablam/comment-page-1/#comment-6695</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 17:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/13/kablam/#comment-6695</guid>
		<description>Thanks Charles. You&#039;re right, there&#039;s very little point in arguing any more (which doesn&#039;t stop us of course), but the link was very educational. I appreciate your taking the time to post it.

Jeff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Charles. You&#8217;re right, there&#8217;s very little point in arguing any more (which doesn&#8217;t stop us of course), but the link was very educational. I appreciate your taking the time to post it.</p>
<p>Jeff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TexasAndroid</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/13/kablam/comment-page-1/#comment-6692</link>
		<dc:creator>TexasAndroid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2005 15:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/13/kablam/#comment-6692</guid>
		<description>At Google Globetrotting, we have a whole category of Google Maps links to Craters.  The category is a mix of impact and volcanic craters, but there are a lot of impact craters listed.

http://googleglobetrotting.com/show.php/t/cat/cat/67/s/0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At Google Globetrotting, we have a whole category of Google Maps links to Craters.  The category is a mix of impact and volcanic craters, but there are a lot of impact craters listed.</p>
<p><a href="http://googleglobetrotting.com/show.php/t/cat/cat/67/s/0" rel="nofollow">http://googleglobetrotting.com/show.php/t/cat/cat/67/s/0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FRANCOIS GRAVEL</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/13/kablam/comment-page-1/#comment-6691</link>
		<dc:creator>FRANCOIS GRAVEL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2005 19:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/13/kablam/#comment-6691</guid>
		<description>THE PHOTOS ARE MISSING THE NEW QUEBEC CRATER LOCATED IN THE UNGAVA BAY PENINSULA IN NORTHEN QUEBEC

HERE IS  LINK www.unites.uqam.ca/tuvaaluk/ milieu_physique/FrCratNQ2.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE PHOTOS ARE MISSING THE NEW QUEBEC CRATER LOCATED IN THE UNGAVA BAY PENINSULA IN NORTHEN QUEBEC</p>
<p>HERE IS  LINK <a href="http://www.unites.uqam.ca/tuvaaluk/" rel="nofollow">http://www.unites.uqam.ca/tuvaaluk/</a> milieu_physique/FrCratNQ2.html</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
