<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Skepchicks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:51:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lurchgs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6718</link>
		<dc:creator>Lurchgs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6718</guid>
		<description>Not all non-skepchics are bad (I&#039;m married, after all, and have been for ... a long time).  If she were a skepchick, I&#039;d be single, with nothing to do but play computer games, take photos, and lie in the back yard gazing bemusedly at those little holes in the night sky.

ok.... let me think on this a bit...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all non-skepchics are bad (I&#8217;m married, after all, and have been for &#8230; a long time).  If she were a skepchick, I&#8217;d be single, with nothing to do but play computer games, take photos, and lie in the back yard gazing bemusedly at those little holes in the night sky.</p>
<p>ok&#8230;. let me think on this a bit&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TJ</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6717</link>
		<dc:creator>TJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Sep 2005 18:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6717</guid>
		<description>I ordered my calendar yesterday and joined the forum last week.  Hello Skepchicks!  I look forward to meeting you at TAM4 (http://www.tam4.com)
Oh, you too Phil!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ordered my calendar yesterday and joined the forum last week.  Hello Skepchicks!  I look forward to meeting you at TAM4 (<a href="http://www.tam4.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.tam4.com</a>)<br />
Oh, you too Phil!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siberia (who's girlishly skeptical)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6716</link>
		<dc:creator>Siberia (who's girlishly skeptical)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Sep 2005 13:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6716</guid>
		<description>;) I suppose I can agree with Irishman &amp; the rest. I&#039;ve been haunted by painfully credulous women - even among my own family, though I&#039;m relieved to say my mother and sister (and that&#039;s about all family I got) aren&#039;t as credulous as the rest.

Maybe that&#039;s why most of my friends are male. Maybe it&#039;s the constant bashing of astrology and magic...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I suppose I can agree with Irishman &amp; the rest. I&#8217;ve been haunted by painfully credulous women &#8211; even among my own family, though I&#8217;m relieved to say my mother and sister (and that&#8217;s about all family I got) aren&#8217;t as credulous as the rest.</p>
<p>Maybe that&#8217;s why most of my friends are male. Maybe it&#8217;s the constant bashing of astrology and magic&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renata</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6698</link>
		<dc:creator>Renata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2005 18:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6698</guid>
		<description>Nice of you to buy the calendar, Phil. I will even autograph it &quot;to my favorite authority figure&quot; before I kick you out of the Pajama Party ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice of you to buy the calendar, Phil. I will even autograph it &#8220;to my favorite authority figure&#8221; before I kick you out of the Pajama Party <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MLynn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6701</link>
		<dc:creator>MLynn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2005 02:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6701</guid>
		<description>Hey, Phil - I&#039;m glad you ordered a calendar.  You won&#039;t be disappointed - thanks for the great words in your blog.  Mik
P.S.  You&#039;ll see part of me in the calendar...heheheheheh</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Phil &#8211; I&#8217;m glad you ordered a calendar.  You won&#8217;t be disappointed &#8211; thanks for the great words in your blog.  Mik<br />
P.S.  You&#8217;ll see part of me in the calendar&#8230;heheheheheh</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Douglas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6715</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6715</guid>
		<description>Hm, looks like the bug I encountered didn&#039;t prevent posting. The site produced some sort of weird regular expression error the first time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm, looks like the bug I encountered didn&#8217;t prevent posting. The site produced some sort of weird regular expression error the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith Douglas</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6714</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith Douglas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 15:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6714</guid>
		<description>shameless plug ...  If you also want to debate or learn about the epistemology presupposed by science and its relationship to the two kinds of skepticism, you can look at my website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>shameless plug &#8230;  If you also want to debate or learn about the epistemology presupposed by science and its relationship to the two kinds of skepticism, you can look at my website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greedo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6713</link>
		<dc:creator>Greedo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2005 03:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6713</guid>
		<description>Where there are cerebral male nerds, there will always be women eager to flirt and get a quick fix of attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where there are cerebral male nerds, there will always be women eager to flirt and get a quick fix of attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irishman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6712</link>
		<dc:creator>Irishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:10:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6712</guid>
		<description>For more discussion, there&#039;s also the BAUT forum. *cough cough*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For more discussion, there&#8217;s also the BAUT forum. *cough cough*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wicked Zoot</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6711</link>
		<dc:creator>Wicked Zoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 16:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6711</guid>
		<description>Oh, ok.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, ok.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unnamed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6710</link>
		<dc:creator>Unnamed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 14:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6710</guid>
		<description>Wicked Zoot,

  You&#039;ll get limited visibility asking here. Other people came because of the calendar.

  Bring your questions to the JREF (forums.randi.org) and people will debate that with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wicked Zoot,</p>
<p>  You&#8217;ll get limited visibility asking here. Other people came because of the calendar.</p>
<p>  Bring your questions to the JREF (forums.randi.org) and people will debate that with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wicked Zoot</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6709</link>
		<dc:creator>Wicked Zoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6709</guid>
		<description>&quot;[...] a skeptical person should believe or disbelieve things based on evidence.&quot; - Nick

Well, that is what I am asking about you see. What constitues evidence to a skeptic.
Science tend to operate out of a pramatist/objectivist epistemology which is really pretty flawed. But it does&#039;nt matter a great deal since the it always has a defined purpose, an objective that exists within the same context as the scientific investigation.
So it is pragmatic and contextual.

But it seems to me that &quot;skeptisism&quot; tries elevate it to something universal and absolute, by asuming that it applies to, and can be used to shoot down anything that lies outside of its realm.

In essence making science a religious practise and objectivism a doctrine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;[...] a skeptical person should believe or disbelieve things based on evidence.&#8221; &#8211; Nick</p>
<p>Well, that is what I am asking about you see. What constitues evidence to a skeptic.<br />
Science tend to operate out of a pramatist/objectivist epistemology which is really pretty flawed. But it does&#8217;nt matter a great deal since the it always has a defined purpose, an objective that exists within the same context as the scientific investigation.<br />
So it is pragmatic and contextual.</p>
<p>But it seems to me that &#8220;skeptisism&#8221; tries elevate it to something universal and absolute, by asuming that it applies to, and can be used to shoot down anything that lies outside of its realm.</p>
<p>In essence making science a religious practise and objectivism a doctrine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6708</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 01:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6708</guid>
		<description>Just a note: if any of you want to see what women are doing in the skeptical community, check out our forum at http://www.skepchick.mu.nu/forum .  We&#039;re just getting started, but with the support of super smart skepdudes like Phil, we&#039;ll be changing the world in no time.

Okay, I&#039;m finished plugging now.  :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a note: if any of you want to see what women are doing in the skeptical community, check out our forum at <a href="http://www.skepchick.mu.nu/forum" rel="nofollow">http://www.skepchick.mu.nu/forum</a> .  We&#8217;re just getting started, but with the support of super smart skepdudes like Phil, we&#8217;ll be changing the world in no time.</p>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;m finished plugging now.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: P. Edward Murray</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6707</link>
		<dc:creator>P. Edward Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 00:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6707</guid>
		<description>Irishman, join the club!

I don&#039;t know why but Amateur Astronomy Clubs are populated by guys with a tiny sprinkling of women.
Single, female amateur astronomers just don&#039;t exist here
in suburban Philadelphia

And oh, buy the way, don&#039;t mess with professional female astronomers unless of course you are a professional male astronomer..doesn&#039;t work.

Maybe I should try to find one of these Skeptic clubs around here?

Phil, you got us beat man, don&#039;t worry be happy!:)

Best wishes,

Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irishman, join the club!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know why but Amateur Astronomy Clubs are populated by guys with a tiny sprinkling of women.<br />
Single, female amateur astronomers just don&#8217;t exist here<br />
in suburban Philadelphia</p>
<p>And oh, buy the way, don&#8217;t mess with professional female astronomers unless of course you are a professional male astronomer..doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>Maybe I should try to find one of these Skeptic clubs around here?</p>
<p>Phil, you got us beat man, don&#8217;t worry be happy!:)</p>
<p>Best wishes,</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6706</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 19:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6706</guid>
		<description>Wicked Zoot said:
&quot;You see, ultimatly, there can be no such thing as absolute proof...&quot;

Skepticism is like the polar opposite of credulity. A credulous person may believe or disbelieve things for any number of reasons, but a skeptical person should believe or disbelieve things based on evidence. Also, beliefs and disbeliefs about the world should fall on a scale of certainty/uncertainty, not into black and white categories of &quot;believe&quot; or &quot;disbelieve.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wicked Zoot said:<br />
&#8220;You see, ultimatly, there can be no such thing as absolute proof&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Skepticism is like the polar opposite of credulity. A credulous person may believe or disbelieve things for any number of reasons, but a skeptical person should believe or disbelieve things based on evidence. Also, beliefs and disbeliefs about the world should fall on a scale of certainty/uncertainty, not into black and white categories of &#8220;believe&#8221; or &#8220;disbelieve.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wicked Zoot</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6705</link>
		<dc:creator>Wicked Zoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6705</guid>
		<description>There is much appeal in skepticism, but so far no one has been able to explain the epistemological framework that it is operating from, to me. It seems to me that the sketical mind set does not have the epistemic anchor that actual science does.

You see, ultimatly, there can be no such thing as absolute proof, because we can not trancend the boundaries of sensory preception. All we know is that we have experiences but nothing is known about how/where those experiences originate.
So all knowlege is belief except that something exists, that is capable of having the experience of being a human on planet earth.

So, how does skeptisism deal with this gap? Not at all as far as I can tell, which sort of invalidates it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is much appeal in skepticism, but so far no one has been able to explain the epistemological framework that it is operating from, to me. It seems to me that the sketical mind set does not have the epistemic anchor that actual science does.</p>
<p>You see, ultimatly, there can be no such thing as absolute proof, because we can not trancend the boundaries of sensory preception. All we know is that we have experiences but nothing is known about how/where those experiences originate.<br />
So all knowlege is belief except that something exists, that is capable of having the experience of being a human on planet earth.</p>
<p>So, how does skeptisism deal with this gap? Not at all as far as I can tell, which sort of invalidates it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6704</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6704</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s wrong with being a self-indulgent egoist?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s wrong with being a self-indulgent egoist?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irishman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6703</link>
		<dc:creator>Irishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6703</guid>
		<description>As a male skeptic (and painfully single), I&#039;ve been pondering the lack of female skeptics for some while. Permit me some observations.

Skepticism is considered a cerebral process â€“ it is applied critical thinking.  As such, it is not perceived as an emotional act, an empathic activity. It is not about sensing and sharing feelings, it is about evaluating logically.  Women seem more inclined to lean toward â€œfeelingâ€? activities, to sharing emotional experiences and validating them rather than evaluating them.  I do not know whether there is a hormonal factor or whether this difference is purely socially driven, but what Iâ€™ve learned about research suggests there may be some biological influences.

I do not mean to imply that women cannot think critically or rationally, or that women are not intelligent.  Just that their interest and attitude is more inclined to emotional sharing rather than logical processing.  Consider the stereotypical reaction of men vs women.  Woman comes home and starts telling her husband all the problems of the day, man starts trying to offer suggestions on how to fix the problem. They end up having a fight because she just wants him to listen and understand, and he sees problems that need fixing rather than a moment for emotional exchange. (Obviously this is a generality and not necessarily applicable to any specific case.)

Add to this that active skepticism (i.e. group activities, community activism) is predominately white men of a certain age.  This is probably a combination of factors including socioeconomic standing as well as the aforementioned predispositions in attitude. There may be other interfering factors, such as prioritizing time to childcare and tending the home.  (Not to say that women are the only ones who should do those things, just that our culture seems to behave that way.)

All of which is to say â€œWay to go, Skepchicksâ€?.  We need to spread the word that skepticism is not just for men.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a male skeptic (and painfully single), I&#8217;ve been pondering the lack of female skeptics for some while. Permit me some observations.</p>
<p>Skepticism is considered a cerebral process â€“ it is applied critical thinking.  As such, it is not perceived as an emotional act, an empathic activity. It is not about sensing and sharing feelings, it is about evaluating logically.  Women seem more inclined to lean toward â€œfeelingâ€? activities, to sharing emotional experiences and validating them rather than evaluating them.  I do not know whether there is a hormonal factor or whether this difference is purely socially driven, but what Iâ€™ve learned about research suggests there may be some biological influences.</p>
<p>I do not mean to imply that women cannot think critically or rationally, or that women are not intelligent.  Just that their interest and attitude is more inclined to emotional sharing rather than logical processing.  Consider the stereotypical reaction of men vs women.  Woman comes home and starts telling her husband all the problems of the day, man starts trying to offer suggestions on how to fix the problem. They end up having a fight because she just wants him to listen and understand, and he sees problems that need fixing rather than a moment for emotional exchange. (Obviously this is a generality and not necessarily applicable to any specific case.)</p>
<p>Add to this that active skepticism (i.e. group activities, community activism) is predominately white men of a certain age.  This is probably a combination of factors including socioeconomic standing as well as the aforementioned predispositions in attitude. There may be other interfering factors, such as prioritizing time to childcare and tending the home.  (Not to say that women are the only ones who should do those things, just that our culture seems to behave that way.)</p>
<p>All of which is to say â€œWay to go, Skepchicksâ€?.  We need to spread the word that skepticism is not just for men.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siberia (who is not skeptical of being girl)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6699</link>
		<dc:creator>Siberia (who is not skeptical of being girl)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6699</guid>
		<description>Go us women unafraid of doubting!
But really... I don&#039;t know why that happens. Pity I&#039;m low on dollars, otherwise I would buy some stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go us women unafraid of doubting!<br />
But really&#8230; I don&#8217;t know why that happens. Pity I&#8217;m low on dollars, otherwise I would buy some stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6700</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 15:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6700</guid>
		<description>BA, you&#039;ll have to explain to &quot;her indoors&quot; how you&#039;re ONLY doing it to support the spread of scepticism (or skepticism if you prefer) everywhere...

Alternatively, do you have a shed in your garden (backyard)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BA, you&#8217;ll have to explain to &#8220;her indoors&#8221; how you&#8217;re ONLY doing it to support the spread of scepticism (or skepticism if you prefer) everywhere&#8230;</p>
<p>Alternatively, do you have a shed in your garden (backyard)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/comment-page-1/#comment-6702</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2005 10:34:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/09/18/skepchicks/#comment-6702</guid>
		<description>Woo hoo, go Skepchicks!  Thanks for the order, Phil.  You could hang it in your car; just don&#039;t get in an accident, okay?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Woo hoo, go Skepchicks!  Thanks for the order, Phil.  You could hang it in your car; just don&#8217;t get in an accident, okay?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-13 20:35:12 -->
