<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Light</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/11/02/first-light/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/11/02/first-light/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:50:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Super cool, if not actually confirmed. &#171; deceptively packaged</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/11/02/first-light/comment-page-2/#comment-201958</link>
		<dc:creator>Super cool, if not actually confirmed. &#171; deceptively packaged</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 22:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/11/02/first-light/#comment-201958</guid>
		<description>[...]    Scientists may have taken a picture of the first stars ever formed. Check it out and feel very small in a very big universe.  Possibly related posts: (automatically [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]    Scientists may have taken a picture of the first stars ever formed. Check it out and feel very small in a very big universe.  Possibly related posts: (automatically [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrolink [Global Edition] &#187; First light, confirmed? &#124; Latest astronomy news in 11 languages</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/11/02/first-light/comment-page-2/#comment-7715</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrolink [Global Edition] &#187; First light, confirmed? &#124; Latest astronomy news in 11 languages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 03:22:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/11/02/first-light/#comment-7715</guid>
		<description>[...] back in November 2005, I wrote about a Spitzer Space Telescope observation that purportedly showed light from the very first objects in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] back in November 2005, I wrote about a Spitzer Space Telescope observation that purportedly showed light from the very first objects in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: roy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/11/02/first-light/comment-page-2/#comment-7714</link>
		<dc:creator>roy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 16:55:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/11/02/first-light/#comment-7714</guid>
		<description>I am just a average joe and am just curious after reading all of this. If the top image is stars and the bottom is the gases before the biggest first stars, then where are those big stars? why don&#039;t we see them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just a average joe and am just curious after reading all of this. If the top image is stars and the bottom is the gases before the biggest first stars, then where are those big stars? why don&#8217;t we see them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buy flonase</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/11/02/first-light/comment-page-2/#comment-7713</link>
		<dc:creator>buy flonase</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 23:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/11/02/first-light/#comment-7713</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;buy flonase...&lt;/strong&gt;

buy flonase
buy flonase - buy flonase
Keep emotionally active.  Cater to your favorite neurosis.
You would if you could but you can&#039;t so you won&#039;t.
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>buy flonase&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>buy flonase<br />
buy flonase &#8211; buy flonase<br />
Keep emotionally active.  Cater to your favorite neurosis.<br />
You would if you could but you can&#8217;t so you won&#8217;t.<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/11/02/first-light/comment-page-2/#comment-7712</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2005 01:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/11/02/first-light/#comment-7712</guid>
		<description>Thats a good question Scott


I&#039;d also like to see the nature article with more details on how they arrived at there decision, is there a link to it somewhere online?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats a good question Scott</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also like to see the nature article with more details on how they arrived at there decision, is there a link to it somewhere online?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/11/02/first-light/comment-page-2/#comment-7711</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/11/02/first-light/#comment-7711</guid>
		<description>Any indication how this diffuse IR glow maps to the known microwave background radiation? Do the distributions of the two line up in any meaningful way?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any indication how this diffuse IR glow maps to the known microwave background radiation? Do the distributions of the two line up in any meaningful way?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The College of Fools</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/11/02/first-light/comment-page-1/#comment-7710</link>
		<dc:creator>The College of Fools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 09:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/11/02/first-light/#comment-7710</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Light from the first stars?&lt;/strong&gt;

	This post explains how researchers at NASA think they may have captured an image of the light from some of the first stars to have formed (13.5 billion years ago); you can even see the picture.  Incredible and awe-inspring.
(Original link from Pharyng...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Light from the first stars?</strong></p>
<p>	This post explains how researchers at NASA think they may have captured an image of the light from some of the first stars to have formed (13.5 billion years ago); you can even see the picture.  Incredible and awe-inspring.<br />
(Original link from Pharyng&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
