DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Once Upon a Time…
Space Studs »

Tin Foiled Again

Are those pesky government mind-controlling rays getting you down, forcing you to pay taxes, making you believe that Intelligent Design is an actual scientific theory?

Then do I have a paper for you! As only those wackheads at MIT can do, they tested the permeability and opacity of aluminum-foil hats to various emissions, to see how well they actually work to block any telekinetically-imposed outside behavioral patterns on an otherwise innocent population. And then they published their results!

They found that the hats do well blocking some transmissions, but surprisingly appear to have amplified some wavelength ranges of electromagnetic energy… suspiciously, a band reserved by the government for its own (presumably nefarious) reasons!

I think this was an interesting test, but they missed a very obvious problem: they used aluminum foil for their hats, and not tin, as they should have ("aluminum-foil hats" doesn’t have the same ring to it). Without this control, how can we know if we are safe or not? Perhaps someone at MIT reads this blog, and will do the obvious follow-up experiment. Don’t expect government funding, though.

Their results are nonetheless intriguing, and make me even more suspicious of any group who claim to make an off-the-shelf model.

Share

November 16th, 2005 10:16 PM by Phil Plait in Antiscience, Cool stuff, Time Sink | 23 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

23 Responses to “Tin Foiled Again”

  1. 1.   Pete Says:
    November 17th, 2005 at 12:46 am

    Hmmm…I think I see a money making idea. A range of government proof hats with a selection of accessories. Perhaps ‘I heart I.D.’ key chains or whistles (for when the spooks bundle you into the back of a van for knowing too much).

    I love these random experiments!

  2. 2.   Stuart Greig Says:
    November 17th, 2005 at 3:27 am

    MIT study debunked:

    http://zapatopi.net/blog/?post=200511112730.afdb_effectiveness

    Is this conspiracy theorist a government stooge? Does he even realise? Is his beanie hat contributing to the control over him?

    Aarrghh I’m going in circles, is my paranoia induced and will it get worse with a paranoiac reducing helmet. Help!

  3. 3.   Sid Says:
    November 17th, 2005 at 5:28 am

    Now it is clear why we are inclined to use baggies and ziplocs for sandwiches. Lunch meat must have performed similar experiments much earlier (maybe in the 60s) than we humans and discovered the signal bands that are amplified by the aluminum foil. They then used the bands to transmit instructions to those humans wearing foil hats to create non-foil-based wrappers so that they (the lunch meats) would not be susceptible to any mind-altering communications from the government. This explains the move to plastics instead of aluminum foil. Did the lunch meats also discover some similar issue with wax paper? (MIT – take note – further experiments may be necessary!)

    Which also explains why the government imposed regulations on labeling of packaged foods (such as lunch meats.) The CIA must have discovered the lunch meat plot and used the labeling to try to disuade Americans from purchasing lunch meats, thereby reducing the lunch meat population and their threat to the government. It didn’t work because the government didn’t take into account Americans’ malaise already induced by the lunch meat plot. I’m sure that some of the UFO-related goverment documents from the 60s and 70s that are now being released will shed some light (somewhere in the GPS band) on this.

    I must get more information on the MIT study so I can redesign my fez.

  4. 4.   Sid Says:
    November 17th, 2005 at 5:38 am

    More information!

    Someone just mentioned that lunch meats by themselves probably do not have the intelligence to have pulled all this off by themselves. Therefore, this all must have been a conspiracy involving white bread and mayonnaise! OhMyGod! Maybe even Kraft cheese slices!

    (ID reference not intentional. I’m sure they had nothing to do with this.)

    Or it could have been just the bread crusts out of frustration from being left off all those sandwiches!

    Too much research to do. Must design new helmet quickly to reduce food influences on my thoghts!

  5. 5.   Evolving Squid Says:
    November 17th, 2005 at 6:31 am

    I’ve always wondered why anyone would think they are so important that the government would make the effort to control their lives with mind control rays… let alone mind control rays that could be blocked by a foil hat.

    To me, that’s a special kind of crazy.

  6. 6.   Kim Says:
    November 17th, 2005 at 8:31 am

    That Amway foil hat recklessly endangers people’s lives! Don’t they realize that without a chain of paper clips extending from the hat to the ground, wearers are in danger of electrocution? Please, people, don’t wear an ungrounded foil hat — it’s for your own safety.

  7. 7.   aiabx Says:
    November 17th, 2005 at 9:23 am

    Kim, Kim, Kim… why don’t you just unmask yourself as an agent of the Illuminati right now? It’s obvious that a grounded tinfoil hat will let the orgone leak out and render the hat useless.
    -Andy B

  8. 8.   BMW Says:
    November 17th, 2005 at 10:12 am

    Heh, there is no way they can get this right, cause everyone knows that you have to PUT THE SHINEY SIDE IN! and they did the opposite.

    PWNNED!

  9. 9.   Tristan Schwartz Says:
    November 17th, 2005 at 10:56 am

    Sigh….

  10. 10.   Irishman Says:
    November 17th, 2005 at 12:19 pm

    If you look at the rebuttal site, you find that the investigators clearly didn’t understand the nature of the “mind control rays” that the hats are supposed to prevent. They may or may not pretect against regular radio waves, but since the proposed mind control rays are “psychotronic energy”, the conclusions from the test are invalid. Clearly. ;-)

  11. 11.   Evolving Squid Says:
    November 17th, 2005 at 12:42 pm

    “psychotronic energy�, the conclusions from the test are invalid.

    I’ve heard that CERN is building a large, ring psychotron under the Alps even as we speak. This 200 km diameter ring psychotron will be used to conduct high energy mind control experiments, egg balancing on non-equinox days, and explore the four-corner time-cube theory of life, the universe and everything.

    The ring is being paid for by secret branches of the UN, using the new, secret UN currency that will supplant the greenback in the USA.

  12. 12.   THX-1138 Says:
    November 17th, 2005 at 1:20 pm

    I used to think all these conspiracy theories were amusing, but no longer. They are toxic memes. I’ve met people so addled with them they are almost completely disassociated from reality, and need severe and immediate psychological help (which they are not going to get).

    I met my friend’s nephew last month. The poor kid is so steeped in this nonsense he actually thinks he is living in one of the most totalitarian and oppressive police states ever to exist. I tried to get him to read “Maus” by Art Spiegelman, but no go.

    What’s funny is that they always say, “Oh! Go to blah blah Bush blah Nazi blah dot org and get the FACTS!!!” If you actually go to one of those sites, all the “FACTS!!!” are backed up by links to other “FACTS!!!” on other similar sites. The other sites link back to the one you started out on. It’s a circle of cites beginning nowhere and ending nowhere. It’s a fantasy reality constructed in the form of a Mobius strip.

    And people call me an elitist when I suggest my vote should count more than their vote. :(

  13. 13.   Irishman Says:
    November 17th, 2005 at 3:16 pm

    Yeah, well my cousin sent me an email wanting me to buy in to his perpetual motion machine. *sigh*

  14. 14.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    November 17th, 2005 at 3:39 pm

    “…they used aluminum foil for their hats, and not tin, as they should have (“aluminum-foil hats” doesn’t have the same ring to it). ”

    BA, tinfoil is called tinfoil because it has a relatively high tin content. Its principal component is still aluminium (or aluminum). So this is not a problem.

  15. 15.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    November 17th, 2005 at 3:41 pm

    Stuart Greig said :

    “Is this conspiracy theorist a government stooge? Does he even realise? Is his beanie hat contributing to the control over him?

    Aarrghh I’m going in circles, is my paranoia induced and will it get worse with a paranoiac reducing helmet. Help! ”

    The question, Stuart, is not “Am I paranoid?”.

    The really important question is “Am I paranoid *enough*?” :)

  16. 16.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    November 17th, 2005 at 3:44 pm

    We should also warn people not to go out in a thuderstorm wearing one of these foil hats ….

  17. 17.   Timothy Gaede Says:
    November 17th, 2005 at 3:49 pm

    A one thousand-fold amplification at the frequencies used for cell phones?

    I knew it!

    But wearing a foil helmet gets me nervous glances…especially at airports.

  18. 18.   George Says:
    November 17th, 2005 at 8:04 pm

    Hmmmm…I tried the aluminum foil under my hat to see if this would boost my remote car door lock/unlock range. Sadly, it did not.

    Of course, I am using the method my son taught me over a year ago. Namely, aim your remote unit under your jaw while looking at your vehicle. The range increase, with our without “tin” foil, is 25%.

  19. 19.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    November 18th, 2005 at 12:39 am

    That’s ‘cos the transmitter uses you as a groundplane and / or reflector element. All that salty water in your body has to be good for something.

    It should work for all remotes, except for infrared ones, in which case it won’t make the blindest bit of difference.

  20. 20.   Joel Sax Says:
    November 18th, 2005 at 2:47 pm

    I have personally made and worn one of those hats. I can declare that they are comfortable and can stand up to any force except that of a pet cat.

  21. 21.   Irishman Says:
    November 18th, 2005 at 3:54 pm

    One more comment on the aluminum vs. tin thing – the official website promoting beanies is the Aliminum Foil Deflector Beanie (AFDB), so the test was appropriate on those grounds.

  22. 22.   Time Cube Cubic Awareness Says:
    January 23rd, 2006 at 2:18 am

    I noticed that “Evolving Squid” referred to Time Cube, the ultimate theory of everything. More information about Time Cube is available at Cubic Awareness Online. Hopefully this’ll help evolving squids to evolve into supersquids. Let’s exhort all squids to cube it up real good.

  23. 23.   Computer Zubehör Says:
    January 27th, 2009 at 7:23 am

    Die geringsten Margen gibts bei Techmania

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • A dying star with the wind in its hair
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
      • An ear to the ocean
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • A dying star with the wind in its hair | Bad Astronomy
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us