<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buffy the theory slayer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:11:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pi-needles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-258194</link>
		<dc:creator>Pi-needles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-258194</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; 2004 XR 190 (it’s been nicknamed “Buffy”, which makes me wonder when they’ll start naming these objects after good shows&lt;/i&gt;

Hey Buffy was a good show! A great one even. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> 2004 XR 190 (it’s been nicknamed “Buffy”, which makes me wonder when they’ll start naming these objects after good shows</i></p>
<p>Hey Buffy was a good show! A great one even. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henri Hein</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8601</link>
		<dc:creator>Henri Hein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2008 02:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8601</guid>
		<description>Count a seventh vote for Buffy as the best show ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Count a seventh vote for Buffy as the best show ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8600</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 07:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8600</guid>
		<description>sorry, what I meant to say was how can anyone respect a scientist who doesn&#039;t like BUFFY.  get over yourself man!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, what I meant to say was how can anyone respect a scientist who doesn&#8217;t like BUFFY.  get over yourself man!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harold</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8599</link>
		<dc:creator>Harold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2005 07:14:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8599</guid>
		<description>I know YMMV, but how can ANYONE respect a scientist who didn&#039;t like BUFFY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know YMMV, but how can ANYONE respect a scientist who didn&#8217;t like BUFFY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8598</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 23:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8598</guid>
		<description>&gt;

While I like the mockery of &quot;Buffy&quot; (a show I enjoyed but thought was overrated), you&#039;re wrong on two counts:

1.) There was already an object in space that was named after a &quot;good show&quot;

2.) If another planet, chunk of ice, or solar system was nicknamed &quot;Brian&quot; or &quot;Stewie&quot;, then that would just be an example of something getting their name from a crappy TV show :).

But I guess it doesn&#039;t really matter what these things are nicknamed, since they&#039;ll probably end up getting different names anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;</p>
<p>While I like the mockery of &#8220;Buffy&#8221; (a show I enjoyed but thought was overrated), you&#8217;re wrong on two counts:</p>
<p>1.) There was already an object in space that was named after a &#8220;good show&#8221;</p>
<p>2.) If another planet, chunk of ice, or solar system was nicknamed &#8220;Brian&#8221; or &#8220;Stewie&#8221;, then that would just be an example of something getting their name from a crappy TV show <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>But I guess it doesn&#8217;t really matter what these things are nicknamed, since they&#8217;ll probably end up getting different names anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Calton</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8597</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Calton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 18:51:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8597</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s artificial.  I&#039;d bet money on it.  Definitely need to send a probe.

By the way, I like the idea of naming objects after porn stars.  Get a lot more support from the &quot;Joe Sixpacks&quot; of the world if we announce we are sending a &quot;probe&quot; to Jenna Jameson and will send back pictures.  They will start writing checks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s artificial.  I&#8217;d bet money on it.  Definitely need to send a probe.</p>
<p>By the way, I like the idea of naming objects after porn stars.  Get a lot more support from the &#8220;Joe Sixpacks&#8221; of the world if we announce we are sending a &#8220;probe&#8221; to Jenna Jameson and will send back pictures.  They will start writing checks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darkhand</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8596</link>
		<dc:creator>Darkhand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 17:29:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8596</guid>
		<description>We really are reading WAY too much into this object. &quot;Buffy&#039;s&quot; orbital tilt strongly suggests this object was not created by the processes that created the solar system. Wheras many, many objects get captured as they pass our solar system.



Granted, most either have too much speed (hyperbolic trajectories) or too little (they fall into the sun); and of the ones that achieve stable orbits, most are on parabolic trajectories. But surely we&#039;d expect a few of them to achieve near-circular orbits that are significantly tipped from the eccliptic.



[Commentator Ektich, in an earlier reply, makes a really good point.]



Where is the big mystery -- what am I missing here?



Maybe instead of questioning our basic assumptions we should act on the obvious probable solution (that &quot;Buffy&quot; is not from around here&quot; and get a probe out there to analyze the materials she&#039;s made of!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We really are reading WAY too much into this object. &#8220;Buffy&#8217;s&#8221; orbital tilt strongly suggests this object was not created by the processes that created the solar system. Wheras many, many objects get captured as they pass our solar system.</p>
<p>Granted, most either have too much speed (hyperbolic trajectories) or too little (they fall into the sun); and of the ones that achieve stable orbits, most are on parabolic trajectories. But surely we&#8217;d expect a few of them to achieve near-circular orbits that are significantly tipped from the eccliptic.</p>
<p>[Commentator Ektich, in an earlier reply, makes a really good point.]</p>
<p>Where is the big mystery &#8212; what am I missing here?</p>
<p>Maybe instead of questioning our basic assumptions we should act on the obvious probable solution (that &#8220;Buffy&#8221; is not from around here&#8221; and get a probe out there to analyze the materials she&#8217;s made of!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ektich</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8595</link>
		<dc:creator>Ektich</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8595</guid>
		<description>Could it be that 2004 XR 190 didn&#039;t actually formed in our solar system, but was passing by and got caught by Sun&#039;s gravity? (maybe it IS a probe? that will cover intelligent design aspect as well!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could it be that 2004 XR 190 didn&#8217;t actually formed in our solar system, but was passing by and got caught by Sun&#8217;s gravity? (maybe it IS a probe? that will cover intelligent design aspect as well!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Gray</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8594</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Dec 2005 01:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8594</guid>
		<description>This object could be from the old T.V. show Family Affair:

&quot;Into this life
of independence came three young orphans, the 6-year old
twins Buffy and Jody and 15-year-old Cissy.

Now could an object named &quot;Jody&quot; be in a close orbit with &quot;Buffy&quot;?

It&#039;s all &quot;Mr. French&quot; to me....  :*)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This object could be from the old T.V. show Family Affair:</p>
<p>&#8220;Into this life<br />
of independence came three young orphans, the 6-year old<br />
twins Buffy and Jody and 15-year-old Cissy.</p>
<p>Now could an object named &#8220;Jody&#8221; be in a close orbit with &#8220;Buffy&#8221;?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s all &#8220;Mr. French&#8221; to me&#8230;.  :*)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8593</link>
		<dc:creator>PK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8593</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s name it Barbarella!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s name it Barbarella!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike bertelsen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8592</link>
		<dc:creator>mike bertelsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 22:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8592</guid>
		<description>Wonderful story. Seems as if most of the news about astronomy have been right in our own solar system. Remarkable! Perhaps we will learn much from this bit of news.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonderful story. Seems as if most of the news about astronomy have been right in our own solar system. Remarkable! Perhaps we will learn much from this bit of news.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zoot!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8591</link>
		<dc:creator>Zoot!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 22:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8591</guid>
		<description>BUFFY!!! Oh, man that show was great. People who don&#039;t think it awesome does so either because A: They dont notice all the layers and subtexts going on, or B: They are mindless automatons - much liked by their highschool teachers, and hooked on knock-knock jokes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BUFFY!!! Oh, man that show was great. People who don&#8217;t think it awesome does so either because A: They dont notice all the layers and subtexts going on, or B: They are mindless automatons &#8211; much liked by their highschool teachers, and hooked on knock-knock jokes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RW</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8590</link>
		<dc:creator>RW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8590</guid>
		<description>Naming it after Buffy or Xena isn&#039;t so bad, but I think that my idea is much better.

I still haven&#039;t heard back from NASA about my proposal for naming new bodies found in the outer solar system.

All of the flak that NASA got because of the naked man and woman on the pioneer probe a few years ago may be a reason my letter may have found its way into a cylindrical file cabinet (ie: Trash Can).

As a male college student that would pay taxes if I had a job, I think that it would be a great idea to name large chunks of ice in the outer solar system after people like Jenna Jameson, Chasey Lain, Teagan Presley, or Briana Banks.

All you prudes hear me out. I think that this idea is perfectly reasonable, and I seriously believe that it has a lot of potential.

Everyone knows that Sex Sells. The Adult industry is HUGE. Its no secret that space activities could use more cash. Get some endorsements from a few pretty faces, name a new rock after an adult actress every now and then and even the Hoover Dam won&#039;t be able to hold back the cash flow.

Who wouldn&#039;t pay to see some hot blonde give a little speech in front of the shuttle, or in front of a mockup of the Mars Rovers, or give a presentation on the latest on the latest images from the Hubble? No one cares about old men in suits.

I&#039;m just saying what most men are currently thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naming it after Buffy or Xena isn&#8217;t so bad, but I think that my idea is much better.</p>
<p>I still haven&#8217;t heard back from NASA about my proposal for naming new bodies found in the outer solar system.</p>
<p>All of the flak that NASA got because of the naked man and woman on the pioneer probe a few years ago may be a reason my letter may have found its way into a cylindrical file cabinet (ie: Trash Can).</p>
<p>As a male college student that would pay taxes if I had a job, I think that it would be a great idea to name large chunks of ice in the outer solar system after people like Jenna Jameson, Chasey Lain, Teagan Presley, or Briana Banks.</p>
<p>All you prudes hear me out. I think that this idea is perfectly reasonable, and I seriously believe that it has a lot of potential.</p>
<p>Everyone knows that Sex Sells. The Adult industry is HUGE. Its no secret that space activities could use more cash. Get some endorsements from a few pretty faces, name a new rock after an adult actress every now and then and even the Hoover Dam won&#8217;t be able to hold back the cash flow.</p>
<p>Who wouldn&#8217;t pay to see some hot blonde give a little speech in front of the shuttle, or in front of a mockup of the Mars Rovers, or give a presentation on the latest on the latest images from the Hubble? No one cares about old men in suits.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just saying what most men are currently thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irishman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8589</link>
		<dc:creator>Irishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8589</guid>
		<description>Joxer the Mighty! That&#039;s what we need to name one of these guys!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joxer the Mighty! That&#8217;s what we need to name one of these guys!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irishman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8588</link>
		<dc:creator>Irishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8588</guid>
		<description>Diederick de Vries Said:
&gt;Hmmm. Scientists love to be proven wrong? Now thatâ€™s just too utopian. Like it or not, but contrary to what the ideal scientist is supposed to behave like, most of us are just mortals, and I know A LOT of them who would keep everything secret that proves their articles wrong. After all, being right is what gets you a reputation and new funding, is it not?

Scientists love to have everyone else proven wrong, especially when it means they are right. ;-)

The Bad Astronomer Said:
&gt;I loved the original Buffy movie. I watched several episodes of the TV show, and didnâ€™t care for it. I did see some episodes of Angel, and it made me laugh, but I think it was just a little bit too much on the cheesy side.

That&#039;s ironic, given that most people* think the movie was too cheesy and a bit lame, but think the TV show is the wittiest and best written program ever made**.

*Okay, most people who watch sci fi, as opposed to people who think both are crappy because they&#039;re not a &quot;reality&quot; show or soap opera or sporting event.

**I&#039;ll collect my &quot;Joss Whedon is God&quot; points now, thank you. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Diederick de Vries Said:<br />
&gt;Hmmm. Scientists love to be proven wrong? Now thatâ€™s just too utopian. Like it or not, but contrary to what the ideal scientist is supposed to behave like, most of us are just mortals, and I know A LOT of them who would keep everything secret that proves their articles wrong. After all, being right is what gets you a reputation and new funding, is it not?</p>
<p>Scientists love to have everyone else proven wrong, especially when it means they are right. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The Bad Astronomer Said:<br />
&gt;I loved the original Buffy movie. I watched several episodes of the TV show, and didnâ€™t care for it. I did see some episodes of Angel, and it made me laugh, but I think it was just a little bit too much on the cheesy side.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s ironic, given that most people* think the movie was too cheesy and a bit lame, but think the TV show is the wittiest and best written program ever made**.</p>
<p>*Okay, most people who watch sci fi, as opposed to people who think both are crappy because they&#8217;re not a &#8220;reality&#8221; show or soap opera or sporting event.</p>
<p>**I&#8217;ll collect my &#8220;Joss Whedon is God&#8221; points now, thank you. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DouglasG</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8587</link>
		<dc:creator>DouglasG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8587</guid>
		<description>So, if we start with Gabrielle and then Xena...  How does Buffy follow?  I would think Autolycus or Joxer the Mighty would be more appropriate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, if we start with Gabrielle and then Xena&#8230;  How does Buffy follow?  I would think Autolycus or Joxer the Mighty would be more appropriate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CR</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8586</link>
		<dc:creator>CR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 18:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8586</guid>
		<description>Speaking of names that relate to tv programs (intentionally or not), I thought it was cool when one of the early names for the ISS was &quot;Alpha.&quot; (In spite of its bad science, I&#039;m a Space: 1999 fan. Well, a fan of the first season anyway.)
As for Family Guy names, if we&#039;re going to call something &quot;Stewie,&quot; we&#039;d also have to call something else &quot;Brian,&quot; who&#039;s probably the most intelligent character on the show. (Don&#039;t tell Stewie I said that!)

Of course, since the universe seems to be &quot;thumbing its nose&quot; at us humans and our pitifully small understanding of things, maybe we should name something &quot;Bender.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of names that relate to tv programs (intentionally or not), I thought it was cool when one of the early names for the ISS was &#8220;Alpha.&#8221; (In spite of its bad science, I&#8217;m a Space: 1999 fan. Well, a fan of the first season anyway.)<br />
As for Family Guy names, if we&#8217;re going to call something &#8220;Stewie,&#8221; we&#8217;d also have to call something else &#8220;Brian,&#8221; who&#8217;s probably the most intelligent character on the show. (Don&#8217;t tell Stewie I said that!)</p>
<p>Of course, since the universe seems to be &#8220;thumbing its nose&#8221; at us humans and our pitifully small understanding of things, maybe we should name something &#8220;Bender.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8585</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8585</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s encouraging to see that you&#039;re opinion on three &quot;good shows&quot; matches mine :-)

As for this ice chunk, it&#039;s clear that the U.S. Government put it there using its captured alien space craft. (which we have been backwards engineering for the last 60 years, succesfully, dispite our inability to get to the moon.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s encouraging to see that you&#8217;re opinion on three &#8220;good shows&#8221; matches mine <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As for this ice chunk, it&#8217;s clear that the U.S. Government put it there using its captured alien space craft. (which we have been backwards engineering for the last 60 years, succesfully, dispite our inability to get to the moon.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff G.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8584</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8584</guid>
		<description>And I bet you just loved the proposal to name a planet &quot;Xena&quot;

I may be supportive of your scientific endeavours, but I&#039;m highly skeptical of your taste in television.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I bet you just loved the proposal to name a planet &#8220;Xena&#8221;</p>
<p>I may be supportive of your scientific endeavours, but I&#8217;m highly skeptical of your taste in television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Reidelbach</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8583</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Reidelbach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:12:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8583</guid>
		<description>Buffy...I like it.  The name, not particularly the show.  But I think it might be better assigned to our host, himself.  Buffy, the Bad Astronomer: destroyer of anti-science (ala vampires).  It&#039;s got a ring to it.  Think about it, Buffy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buffy&#8230;I like it.  The name, not particularly the show.  But I think it might be better assigned to our host, himself.  Buffy, the Bad Astronomer: destroyer of anti-science (ala vampires).  It&#8217;s got a ring to it.  Think about it, Buffy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8582</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:06:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8582</guid>
		<description>I loved the original Buffy movie. I watched several episodes of the TV show, and didn&#039;t care for it. I did see some episodes of Angel, and it made me laugh, but I think it was just a little bit too much on the cheesy side.

And yes, I knew I&#039;d get protests when I wrote that. My old boss &lt;i&gt;worships&lt;/i&gt; Buffy. I don&#039;t think he reads my blog though. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the original Buffy movie. I watched several episodes of the TV show, and didn&#8217;t care for it. I did see some episodes of Angel, and it made me laugh, but I think it was just a little bit too much on the cheesy side.</p>
<p>And yes, I knew I&#8217;d get protests when I wrote that. My old boss <i>worships</i> Buffy. I don&#8217;t think he reads my blog though. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berkeley</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8581</link>
		<dc:creator>Berkeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8581</guid>
		<description>BA: What did you win?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BA: What did you win?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8580</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 15:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8580</guid>
		<description>Dude, seriously, don&#039;t diss Buffy.  That&#039;s justâ€¦ wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, seriously, don&#8217;t diss Buffy.  That&#8217;s justâ€¦ wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8579</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8579</guid>
		<description>Ditto Jess Mills post above.  It did seem silly until I actually watched a few eps.  Love the column Phil.  Trust me when I say naming it after Buffy is a fitting tribute.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto Jess Mills post above.  It did seem silly until I actually watched a few eps.  Love the column Phil.  Trust me when I say naming it after Buffy is a fitting tribute.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jess Mills</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/comment-page-1/#comment-8578</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess Mills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/13/buffy-the-theory-slayer/#comment-8578</guid>
		<description>Umm...  A complete aside, not really relating to the point of your post.  Did you ever WATCH &quot;Buffy&quot;?  I used to dis it, based entirely on the name and the premise...  Then I actually watched it, and realized that it was the most intelligent thing on television (though not for the science, admittedly).  And the guy who wrote it also wrote &quot;Firefly&quot; - notable for having no sound in space.

Anyway, love your column!

Jess</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230;  A complete aside, not really relating to the point of your post.  Did you ever WATCH &#8220;Buffy&#8221;?  I used to dis it, based entirely on the name and the premise&#8230;  Then I actually watched it, and realized that it was the most intelligent thing on television (though not for the science, admittedly).  And the guy who wrote it also wrote &#8220;Firefly&#8221; &#8211; notable for having no sound in space.</p>
<p>Anyway, love your column!</p>
<p>Jess</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 16:34:59 -->
