<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 300,000,000 Americans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/30/300000000-americans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/30/300000000-americans/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:24:58 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Antipodean</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/30/300000000-americans/comment-page-1/#comment-9126</link>
		<dc:creator>Antipodean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:17:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/30/300000000-americans/#comment-9126</guid>
		<description>Mikal555, we are not at 19 million, we are at 22, and Sydney does not have one third of our population, it has about four million, and Melbourne (which is much better) has around 3.1 million, neither near a third of the total</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mikal555, we are not at 19 million, we are at 22, and Sydney does not have one third of our population, it has about four million, and Melbourne (which is much better) has around 3.1 million, neither near a third of the total</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nitrous Amine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/30/300000000-americans/comment-page-1/#comment-9125</link>
		<dc:creator>Nitrous Amine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 08:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/30/300000000-americans/#comment-9125</guid>
		<description>Haa ha...You astronomers, you crazy counter-watchers. I betcha twenty five folx answer this one:

When will unix reach 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 epoch time???

(The predicted fourth coming of Shub-Internet)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haa ha&#8230;You astronomers, you crazy counter-watchers. I betcha twenty five folx answer this one:</p>
<p>When will unix reach 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 epoch time???</p>
<p>(The predicted fourth coming of Shub-Internet)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/30/300000000-americans/comment-page-1/#comment-9124</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 19:38:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/30/300000000-americans/#comment-9124</guid>
		<description>Sadly, in both China and India, &quot;one child&quot; often means &quot;one son.&quot; In China when the policy was first adopted, a lot of peasants thought that girl children didn&#039;t count, so they kept trying until they had a boy. Also, China didn&#039;t ever exterminate second children as a policy, they just demoted you or your cadre in the Party or cut off financial assistance (and in some cases force abortions or tubal ligations -- but I gather the CCP doesn&#039;t explicitly endorse these measures). There seems to be only two reliable cures for large families: educate women and/or have them move to the city.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly, in both China and India, &#8220;one child&#8221; often means &#8220;one son.&#8221; In China when the policy was first adopted, a lot of peasants thought that girl children didn&#8217;t count, so they kept trying until they had a boy. Also, China didn&#8217;t ever exterminate second children as a policy, they just demoted you or your cadre in the Party or cut off financial assistance (and in some cases force abortions or tubal ligations &#8212; but I gather the CCP doesn&#8217;t explicitly endorse these measures). There seems to be only two reliable cures for large families: educate women and/or have them move to the city.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dude</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/30/300000000-americans/comment-page-1/#comment-9123</link>
		<dc:creator>Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 17:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/30/300000000-americans/#comment-9123</guid>
		<description>What India needs is a one child law similar to China&#039;s ( If you have more than
one child than the second child will die) If India doesn&#039;t take action, then by 2050, India will be the most populous country in thes world! China needs to strengthen their one-child rule too. If you are really interested now,
then go to http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/worldbalance/  .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What India needs is a one child law similar to China&#8217;s ( If you have more than<br />
one child than the second child will die) If India doesn&#8217;t take action, then by 2050, India will be the most populous country in thes world! China needs to strengthen their one-child rule too. If you are really interested now,<br />
then go to <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/worldbalance/" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/worldbalance/</a>  .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Siefert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/30/300000000-americans/comment-page-1/#comment-9122</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Siefert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2006 01:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/30/300000000-americans/#comment-9122</guid>
		<description>I once &quot;lived&quot; in Sydney. When I wasn&#039;t working or sleeping, I was stuck in traffic. That&#039;s not a life.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I once &#8220;lived&#8221; in Sydney. When I wasn&#8217;t working or sleeping, I was stuck in traffic. That&#8217;s not a life.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell W. Coover</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/30/300000000-americans/comment-page-1/#comment-9121</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell W. Coover</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 23:27:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/30/300000000-americans/#comment-9121</guid>
		<description>To Mikal555:

Re: &quot;with 1/3 living in Sydney..&quot;

You are assuming that &quot;living in Sydney&quot; is &quot;living&quot; in Sydney (or vice versa).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Mikal555:</p>
<p>Re: &#8220;with 1/3 living in Sydney..&#8221;</p>
<p>You are assuming that &#8220;living in Sydney&#8221; is &#8220;living&#8221; in Sydney (or vice versa).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mickal555</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/30/300000000-americans/comment-page-1/#comment-9120</link>
		<dc:creator>Mickal555</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2006 18:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2005/12/30/300000000-americans/#comment-9120</guid>
		<description>Gee
I thought it was 120mill over there....

We are still at 19 I think, with 1/3 living in sydney...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee<br />
I thought it was 120mill over there&#8230;.</p>
<p>We are still at 19 I think, with 1/3 living in sydney&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
