DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« AAS Post #4: News and cool pictures
AAS Post #6: The cosmological not-so-constant »

AAS Post #5: The warm heart of the Milky Way

‘

Holy cow, look at that! You want an explanation of what you’re looking at? You know the drill: sit back, relax, and have a listen.

Regular readers may remember a flurry of entries here about the Spitzer Space Telescope, an orbiting observatory that can detect infrared light. IR, as it’s called, tends to be given off by warm dust in space (by warm I mean astronomically warm: maybe from Antarctic temperatures to room temperature or so). You can do some observations of IR from the ground, but our air has this annoying tendency to absorb light at these wavelengths, so in effect we’re blind down here to astronomical IR (though we can breathe, so there are advantages to air as well).

That’s why Spitzer is in orbit. Though it’s not a particularly large telescope (its mirror is less than a meter across, smaller than most ground-based professional ‘scopes), its vantage point over our atmosphere gives it remarkable views of space.

Like that picture at the top of this entry. What you’re seeing there (click for access to much higher-res images) is the inner 900 x 600 light years of our Galaxy, the Milky Way. For comparison, the Earth is roughly 25,000 light years from the center, and the whole Galaxy is 100,000 light years across. So this image represents the inner 1% of the whole shebang.

The wealth of science in this image is astounding. It’s a composite of three IR “colors”, each of which is sensitive to different processes. The flavor of IR nearest to visible light is emitted by both dust and stars. But as you go farther into the IR, the stars disappear and the dust really gets bright. By adding together these colors, a rich tapestry is created. Nearly all the stars in this image are red giants and red supergiants, stars in their declining years (where the Sun will be in a few billion years). Some will simply fade away, while others will explode as supernovae. When they do, they create so much energy it can blow gas clear out the Galaxy. Super-bright stars also blow off winds of gas that can slam into the junk (more gas and dust) between the stars, driving it out of the Galaxy the same way a snowplow pushes snow off your driveway. The tendrils of dust above and below the Galactic center display this silent wind.

In the center, the Milky Way is glowing brightly in IR. In the middle of that spot, far too small to see on this scale, is a black hole 4 million times the mass of the Sun. It’s too far away from us to hurt us, but it strongly affects the objects within a few hundred light years of its terrible grip. Gas, dust, and stars are streaming around it at speeds of hundreds of kilometers per second, heating up the surrounding neighborhood, causing it to glow in IR. Much higher-resolution images show some of this better. Sometimes, as material gets very near the black hole, it heats up as it falls in. The material releases this energy, sparking flares of emission we can detect even from our relatively safe vantage point of 250 quadrillion kilometers away.

To understand this better, astronomers started a multi-telescope campaign to observe the black hole, which included Spitzer (IR), Hubble (visible light), XMM-Newton (high-energy X-rays), INTEGRAL (super high-energy gamma rays) and many ground-based ‘scopes. By observing at all these different energies, astronomers can figure out quite a bit about the physical mechanisms going on. The big mystery is not that the stuff near the black hole there is glowing, but why it’s not glowing very much. Some galaxies boom out from their cores (we call them active galaxies), but ours doesn’t. I suppose that’s a good thing, as this tends to make the galaxy a bit inhospitable for folks like us.

Understanding all this a big task, but the tools we wield are mighty. It’s amazing that we can study an object enshrouded in gas and dust at all that distance, but perhaps most wondrous is that when we do, the vista is as beautiful as it is.’

Share

January 10th, 2006 9:21 AM by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, Science | 19 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

19 Responses to “AAS Post #5: The warm heart of the Milky Way”

  1. 1.   Ozastro Says:
    January 10th, 2006 at 10:47 am

    That is soooo cool :)

    Love your AAS blogs.

  2. 2.   Michelle Rochon Says:
    January 10th, 2006 at 11:14 am

    Very cool indeed! I always found the center of the milky way awesome. :)
    By the by Mr. Phil, I think your troll posted a comment again in the previous post.

  3. 3.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    January 10th, 2006 at 12:56 pm

    Nice blog entry, Phil. You got a bit poetic towards the end there.

    Plus, those pics are way cool.

  4. 4.   Will Says:
    January 10th, 2006 at 1:49 pm

    Very beautiful pix by themselves; when one considers the distance and the technology involved to surmount that, it is even more astounding. I still can’t grasp fully the concept of a black hole, however. I don’t see how an object with so much gravitational influence can form in the first place. I suppose once that is discovered, then folks will fully understand gravity. Anyhow, I’m glad you keep the explaining as elementary as you do, otherwise I’d be waaay out in left field myself – almost like our solar system is in relation to our galaxy…

  5. 5.   Thomas Siefert Says:
    January 10th, 2006 at 2:00 pm

    Yes, very poetic.
    I love sentences like “super high-energy gamma rays”

  6. 6.   Chip Says:
    January 10th, 2006 at 4:47 pm

    Love to have a wallpaper of that view. (Not in the computer – on the actual wall!)

  7. 7.   Kevin from NYC Says:
    January 10th, 2006 at 9:42 pm

    now that I set as my XP background. (not the other one)

  8. 8.   Wolverine Says:
    January 11th, 2006 at 12:54 am

    Purely awesome.

  9. 9.   Philippec Says:
    January 11th, 2006 at 6:15 am

    These pictures are really astoundingly beautiful!!!

    Thank you for bringing all these wonderful pictures to our attention!!

    I was wondering, what would the sky look like, if our sun was near the center of our galaxy, somewhere in that picture (assuming we would be able to live there to see it)? there seems to be an awful lot of matter down there….

  10. 10.   SFwriter Says:
    January 11th, 2006 at 7:14 am

    I had a look at the 6000×4800 resolution image and zoomed it 6400% (sic). I was using 4 pixels per star (about 5mm x 5mm each) to examine stars, and I could see how far off centre each star was from the group of pixels’ intersection point. I didn’t even know such high rez photos were available… I was toying with the idea of zooming to 12,800% or 25,600% to see if I could do a spectographic analysis by naked eye… :-) I REALLY love my FIREFOX webrowser and the add-ons that are available for it… I never suspected I would use such high zooming capabilities before…

  11. 11.   Dori Says:
    January 11th, 2006 at 8:01 am

    Each time I see an astronomical picture I’m reminded of the quote from “Hamlet”: “There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.” Thanks for the incredible picture, Phil, and thanks even more for doing all you can to combat ignorance. (Including mine– I figure a day when I don’t learn SOMETHING new is a day wasted!)

    By the way, this is my first post ever to ANY blog– I’m a 54-year-old housewife. But this photo truly inspired me!

  12. 12.   TJ Says:
    January 11th, 2006 at 9:19 am

    This type of science is so unbelievably awesome, I could spend days just gazing at the photos. *sigh*

  13. 13.   Lucid Says:
    January 11th, 2006 at 10:51 am

    Not as pretty as the Large Magellanic from a day or so ago! :)

  14. 14.   Marlayna Says:
    January 11th, 2006 at 12:39 pm

    I’ve always been mystified by the beauty of the universe. Why do we perceive these things as beautiful? Is it because we know the science behind it all? Is it a matter of scale? I find it strange.that the universe is so beautiful…

  15. 15.   Karen M. Says:
    January 11th, 2006 at 12:49 pm

    Spitzer has opened our eyes so much over the past couple years.

    Thanks for sharing the science and your thoughts on such an awesome picture. We can look at other galaxies and thing “that MIGHT be like our home galaxy…”, but this is IT. Our home is so small in comparison to the rest of the universe, it boggles the mind.

    I appreciate you setting up the blog on Feedblitz, too, it is very convenient!

    Karen M., Baltimore, MD

  16. 16.   Sophie Anderton Says:
    January 11th, 2006 at 5:09 pm

    Can you be any more boring? Yawn.

  17. 17.   SFwriter Says:
    January 12th, 2006 at 11:10 am

    If we were more boring, would you go away? I’m sure we could make the effort to be much duller just to be rid of you…

  18. 18.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    January 12th, 2006 at 12:25 pm

    “Sophie Anderton” said:
    “Can you be any more boring? Yawn.”

    Obviously not so boring that you didn’t bother to read the comments. Which say more about you than they do about us.

    Phil – it looks like you’ve acquired another troll.

  19. 19.   Irishman Says:
    January 12th, 2006 at 1:42 pm

    Nigel Depledge Said:
    >Phil – it looks like you’ve acquired another troll.

    Same one, new name.

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA?
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA? | Bad Astronomy
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts | Bad Astronomy
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair | Bad Astronomy
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us