<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pluto, ho!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/01/19/pluto-ho/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/01/19/pluto-ho/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 16:44:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elwood Herring</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/01/19/pluto-ho/comment-page-1/#comment-10082</link>
		<dc:creator>Elwood Herring</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 15:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/01/19/pluto-ho/#comment-10082</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d just like to celebrate this occasion by passing on this little-known poem by Stanley G. Weinbaum. It was included in his 1934 book &quot;The New Adam&quot;, and according to the book it was written about Neptune, but I think Pluto is more appropriate. I hope I&#039;m not violating copyright by printing this here but if I am I apologise. I think this poem deserves wider recognition, and it paints a beautifully austere Plutonian landscape.

I am the planet eremite,
The gaunt repulsor of the light
That falls like icy rain at night.
From frigid stars and moons a-cold.
Ye have not seen a world like this -
The blank and oceanless abyss,
The nameless pit and precipice,
The mountain very bleak and old.
Yet ah - my silence murmereth!
Oh inner orbs, ye have not heard
That stillness where there is no death
Because no life hath ever stirred!
&quot;But here God&#039;s very name is dead!&quot;
Wept Heaven&#039;s mighty myriarch,
Then trembling, turned away and fled
For something gibbered in the dark!

Stanley G. Weinbaum 1934 (approx)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d just like to celebrate this occasion by passing on this little-known poem by Stanley G. Weinbaum. It was included in his 1934 book &#8220;The New Adam&#8221;, and according to the book it was written about Neptune, but I think Pluto is more appropriate. I hope I&#8217;m not violating copyright by printing this here but if I am I apologise. I think this poem deserves wider recognition, and it paints a beautifully austere Plutonian landscape.</p>
<p>I am the planet eremite,<br />
The gaunt repulsor of the light<br />
That falls like icy rain at night.<br />
From frigid stars and moons a-cold.<br />
Ye have not seen a world like this -<br />
The blank and oceanless abyss,<br />
The nameless pit and precipice,<br />
The mountain very bleak and old.<br />
Yet ah &#8211; my silence murmereth!<br />
Oh inner orbs, ye have not heard<br />
That stillness where there is no death<br />
Because no life hath ever stirred!<br />
&#8220;But here God&#8217;s very name is dead!&#8221;<br />
Wept Heaven&#8217;s mighty myriarch,<br />
Then trembling, turned away and fled<br />
For something gibbered in the dark!</p>
<p>Stanley G. Weinbaum 1934 (approx)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/01/19/pluto-ho/comment-page-1/#comment-10101</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 05:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/01/19/pluto-ho/#comment-10101</guid>
		<description>Jack, thanks for the correction on the Titan. You learn something new everyday! So Voyager was sent on its way by about 1.3 million lbs of thrust from the SRM&#039;s, then a second (er, the first) stage with half a million. The difference in speed makes a little more sense now, I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, thanks for the correction on the Titan. You learn something new everyday! So Voyager was sent on its way by about 1.3 million lbs of thrust from the SRM&#8217;s, then a second (er, the first) stage with half a million. The difference in speed makes a little more sense now, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel Depledge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/01/19/pluto-ho/comment-page-1/#comment-10111</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Depledge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 08:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/01/19/pluto-ho/#comment-10111</guid>
		<description>Irishman, thanks for that link.  Only scanned the page so far, but it looks good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Irishman, thanks for that link.  Only scanned the page so far, but it looks good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CousinoMacul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/01/19/pluto-ho/comment-page-1/#comment-10112</link>
		<dc:creator>CousinoMacul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/01/19/pluto-ho/#comment-10112</guid>
		<description>btw, don&#039;t you mean &quot;365.2425 days isn&#039;t what it used to be?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>btw, don&#8217;t you mean &#8220;365.2425 days isn&#8217;t what it used to be?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CousinoMacul</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/01/19/pluto-ho/comment-page-1/#comment-10113</link>
		<dc:creator>CousinoMacul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2006 04:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/01/19/pluto-ho/#comment-10113</guid>
		<description>&quot;Nine years sounds like a lot, but Iâ€™ve found of late 365 days isnâ€™t what it used to be!&quot;

Yeah, I just hit 4-0 two weeks ago.  I&#039;m told that&#039;s young, and I guess compared to Pluto, it is.  :-D

And yes, this is a great time for space exploration.
http://www.savethehubble.com/

â€”Javier</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Nine years sounds like a lot, but Iâ€™ve found of late 365 days isnâ€™t what it used to be!&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah, I just hit 4-0 two weeks ago.  I&#8217;m told that&#8217;s young, and I guess compared to Pluto, it is.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And yes, this is a great time for space exploration.<br />
<a href="http://www.savethehubble.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.savethehubble.com/</a></p>
<p>â€”Javier</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Hagerty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/01/19/pluto-ho/comment-page-1/#comment-10115</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Hagerty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/01/19/pluto-ho/#comment-10115</guid>
		<description>Justin sez: &quot;Voyager was launched on a Titan IIIE. It looks like the Titan provided about 2 million lbs of thrust at liftoff (two SRBâ€™s and 1st stage).&quot;

Just to split hairs, the Titan III&#039;s, unlike the Shuttle, took off on the SRB&#039;s only. The hypergolic core vehicle didn&#039;t light until it was well underway, possibly after SRB sep, but I can&#039;t verify that. To split them even further, the strap-ons are actually called &quot;SRM&#039;s&quot; (Solid Rocket Motors), and are designated &quot;Stage 0&quot; since they light before the first stage.

And an even finer split, only the Titan III C/D/E had the SRM&#039;s. The IIIA and IIIB were the core vehicle only.

- Jack</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justin sez: &#8220;Voyager was launched on a Titan IIIE. It looks like the Titan provided about 2 million lbs of thrust at liftoff (two SRBâ€™s and 1st stage).&#8221;</p>
<p>Just to split hairs, the Titan III&#8217;s, unlike the Shuttle, took off on the SRB&#8217;s only. The hypergolic core vehicle didn&#8217;t light until it was well underway, possibly after SRB sep, but I can&#8217;t verify that. To split them even further, the strap-ons are actually called &#8220;SRM&#8217;s&#8221; (Solid Rocket Motors), and are designated &#8220;Stage 0&#8243; since they light before the first stage.</p>
<p>And an even finer split, only the Titan III C/D/E had the SRM&#8217;s. The IIIA and IIIB were the core vehicle only.</p>
<p>- Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/01/19/pluto-ho/comment-page-1/#comment-10114</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:10:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/01/19/pluto-ho/#comment-10114</guid>
		<description>Glad to see the probe get off the ground.  It is interesting that the DAWN spacecraft to Ceres and Vesta won&#039;t arrive until 2011 (it will be launched in May) and of course the asteroid belt is much closer.  (Uses ion propulsion and is an orbiter so it is a much different mission)
This link is in regards to Cassini explaining the sling shot effect in cartoon form, I like it: http://www.planetary.org/saturn/images/gravity-assist_cartoon_578x333.jpg
Nine years sounds like a lot, but I&#039;ve found of late 365 days isn&#039;t what it used to be!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to see the probe get off the ground.  It is interesting that the DAWN spacecraft to Ceres and Vesta won&#8217;t arrive until 2011 (it will be launched in May) and of course the asteroid belt is much closer.  (Uses ion propulsion and is an orbiter so it is a much different mission)<br />
This link is in regards to Cassini explaining the sling shot effect in cartoon form, I like it: <a href="http://www.planetary.org/saturn/images/gravity-assist_cartoon_578x333.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.planetary.org/saturn/images/gravity-assist_cartoon_578&#215;333.jpg</a><br />
Nine years sounds like a lot, but I&#8217;ve found of late 365 days isn&#8217;t what it used to be!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
