Next stop: TAM 4!

submit to reddit

‘First off : Don’t forget to vote for the Bad Astronomy Blog in this year’s "Bloggies"!

Second off: if you catch this in time, I’ll be on Coast to Coast AM Wednesday night at 10:00 p.m. Pacific time to discuss the new planet discovered (see previous the blog entry).

Third off, I’m going to TAM!

Thursday morning I get on a plane for Las Vegas, to attend James Randi’s The Amaz!ng Meeting. Woohoo! Like I did for the American Astronomical Society meeting two weeks ago, I plan on blogging as often as I can from the meeting to relate events and other fun things going on (including the poker tournament I have no hope of winning, the chocolate challenge, and perhaps — perhaps — a hallway debate between me and another astronomer on whether Pluto is a planet or not (it is, but it shouldn’t be)).

Fourth off, anyway, I may not be able to write here until late Thursday. Until then, do yourself a favor: the new and improved Skepchick website now has features, news, and more. Skeptical reading fun for the whole family! And, occasionally, nudity. So maybe not for the whole family.’

January 25th, 2006 9:05 PM by Phil Plait in Antiscience, Astronomy, Cool stuff, Debunking, Science, Skepticism | 8 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

8 Responses to “Next stop: TAM 4!”

  1. 1.   Nigel Depledge Says:

    10 pm Pacific Time … that’s … er … 6am Thursday here in the UK. I was asleep.

  2. 2.   bad blog reader Says:

    really I think every body here voted for you. you really want to win dontcha?

  3. 3.   Wendy Says:

    Say Hi to Jim Underdown from his three favorite skepchicks Wendy, Sherri and Alice.

  4. 4.   Kaptain K Says:

    Too bad I didn’t read this until Thursday afternoon! :-(

  5. 5.   george Says:

    Don’t forget the Planetary Society’s pro and con reasons for planetary status for Pluto….[url="http://planetary.org/explore/topics/topten/"] here [/url]. :)

    Request: Ya’ll find a clever term for the creationists which are YEC, so that false generalizations aren’t used; since the majority of creationists are pro-science.

  6. 6.   Kevin from NYC Says:

    I clicked on the ads which appeared.

    everyone should

  7. 7.   Wolverine Says:

    Does this belong in the “Antiscience” category? Anti-antiscience perhaps. ;)

  8. 8.   outeast Says:

    Speaking of antiscience, more perfect ad targeting from Goooooogle [sic]AdNonsense – ‘Aether Theories: Relativity is a nonsense Provides a revolution in physics’ [sic]. Way to go!

Leave a Reply