DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Buttars melted!
Huffington Post’s newest blogger »

Hubble delivers again: M101

One thing that amazes me about astronomy is that even after, what, 30 years of doing it (I was really young when I started) I still get surprised at some basic facts.

That picture above is the spiral galaxy M101, a staple of amateur observing. It’s a big, bright, face-on spiral, and since it’s in Ursa Major (near the Big Dipper) it’s up most of the year. I’ve seen it a few times myself, though usually when I’m looking in books. Actually, in a lot of those books, it’s claimed that our own Galaxy would look like M101 if you could get outside of it.

But boy, is that ever wrong! M101 is a lot bigger than the Milky Way. A lot. It’s 170,000 light years across, compared to 100,000 for us. We have an impressive 100 billion stars in the Milky Way, but M101 is bursting with something like a trillion stars, ten times the number in the Milky Way! That’s staggering. I had no clue M101 was so huge.

The picture above is a stunning new release from Hubble (click it for a higher-res version). It’s almost as awesome as the galaxy itself: the original image is 12,000 x 16,000 pixels in size, making it one of the largest images of a spiral galaxy ever produced. The images span nearly a decade and were originally taken for several different projects (it was nice to see the name of my old friend Kip Kuntz as the head of one of those projects; he assisted me way back when on my very first trip to Baltimore to work on Hubble data for my PhD). It took 54 separate Hubble pointing to span the face of this galaxy.

If you have the stomach (and the broadband) for it, you can download the 455 megabyte full-resolution version, but you’d have to be insane. On my monitor, it would be ten screens in width and 20 in height!

But even the medium res image has delights. For example, the image on the left, sliced out of the piddling 10Mb image (on the tip of the spiral arm on the extreme left in the image), shows one of 3000 star clusters found in M101. Take a look at it: each blue dot is actually a massive giant star, much hotter and bigger than the Sun, and each of which is doomed to explode as a supernova someday. There must be many billions of such stars in M101. Some of them are packed so tightly together in that image they’re just a blur. Imagine what the sky must look like from a planet near there…

And the image on the right is a background galaxy (just above and to the left of the center of M101) that is probably something like 20 or more times farther away than M101′s 25 million light year distance. Spirals are generally blue, but no doubt this one is significantly reddened by dust in M101, like a sunset is reddened by dust suspended in air.

Ironically, that galaxy is probably more like our Milky Way: it has a rectangular bar across the center, just like our Galaxy does. A bar like that is due to complicated gravitational interactions in the centers of galaxies, and for some reason M101 doesn’t have one. That’s interesting all by itself.

I could go on and on. The image is incredibly rich in detail! So find yourself a resolution you’re comfortable with, sit back, and skim across the surface of this magnificent galaxy. With a trillion stars, and billions of solar masses of gas and dust, there’s enough there for everyone to enjoy.’

Share

February 28th, 2006 8:27 AM by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, Science | 25 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

25 Responses to “Hubble delivers again: M101”

  1. 1.   Chet Says:
    February 28th, 2006 at 8:43 am

    Surely, inspirational! Awesome! Wonderful! Science is awe inspiring!
    Everyday we gain more knowledge about our Universe. Wow!

  2. 2.   Michelle Rochon Says:
    February 28th, 2006 at 9:00 am

    Really beautiful!

    Eeeh, am I insane enough to download the 455mb version? Maaayybeeee… :)

  3. 3.   Wolverine Says:
    February 28th, 2006 at 9:01 am

    Another fantastic release. I’ve been drooling over the image since it was posted.

  4. 4.   Blake Stacey Says:
    February 28th, 2006 at 9:40 am

    Absolutely fantastic photos! Just one nit to pick: while it may be dust that reddens the galaxies we see behind M101, that’s not the only thing which colors the sunsets here on Old Terra. The reason the sunsets (or “sunclipses”, as Buckminster Fuller’s family would say, to be less geocentrist) are orange, yellow and red is all tied up with the reason the daytime sky is blue. To quote the Physics FAQ,


    Tyndall and Rayleigh thought that the blue colour of the sky must be due to small particles of dust and droplets of water vapour in the atmosphere. Even today, people sometimes incorrectly say that this is the case. Later scientists realised that if this were true, there would be more variation of sky colour with humidity or haze conditions than was actually observed, so they supposed correctly that the molecules of oxygen and nitrogen in the air are sufficient to account for the scattering. The case was finally settled by Einstein in 1911, who calculated the detailed formula for the scattering of light from molecules; and this was found to be in agreement with experiment. He was even able to use the calculation as a further verification of Avogadro’s number when compared with observation. The molecules are able to scatter light because the electromagnetic field of the light waves induces electric dipole moments in the molecules.

    Dust can make a sunset redder, if there’s enough of it, but it’s not the sole thing responsible for the color:


    When the air is clear the sunset will appear yellow, because the light from the sun has passed a long distance through air and some of the blue light has been scattered away. If the air is polluted with small particles, natural or otherwise, the sunset will be more red. Sunsets over the sea may also be orange, due to salt particles in the air, which are effective Tyndall scatterers. The sky around the sun is seen reddened, as well as the light coming directly from the sun. This is because all light is scattered relatively well through small angles–but blue light is then more likely to be scattered twice or more over the greater distances, leaving the yellow, red and orange colours.

    Why the night sky is black is another question entirely, but that’s for another day.

    Oh heck, I’ll just go back to looking at the pretty pictures.

  5. 5.   Thomas Siefert Says:
    February 28th, 2006 at 9:52 am

    Interesting, our Milky Way has a rectangular bar across the center. It’s a bit like Australia then?
    Well, who’s gonna shout the next round?

  6. 6.   Evolving Squid Says:
    February 28th, 2006 at 10:51 am

    Surprisingly, I have had a telescope for 7 years, and have never managed to see this galaxy. Partly because it’s hard to see from where I am (north-ish looks over the city and the resulting city-glow), and partly because I’m still a bit of a doofus about aligning my telescope properly :)

    I have sought help for the latter though. I found some local astronomers who have volunteered to give me the benefit of their experience so I can use my telescope more effectively.

    Question: I have 80mm and 100mm binoculars. Is M-100 within reach of those? I’ve never really tried, but they’re easier to use than the telescope and tend to be better for viewing wide objects.

  7. 7.   Evolving Squid Says:
    February 28th, 2006 at 10:52 am

    er M101, not M100. hopefully everyone knew what I meant :)

  8. 8.   LucasVB Says:
    February 28th, 2006 at 11:51 am

    Heard of this earlier today and, as usual, downloaded the almost-full resolution to take a first look and the full one is still downloading…

    Been taking a look at it since then. Truly an incredible image, lots of things to explore! That cluster from the corner is just stunning!

  9. 9.   Ozastro Says:
    February 28th, 2006 at 12:28 pm

    OK, my shout :)

    Awesome photos

  10. 10.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    February 28th, 2006 at 1:52 pm

    Wow. Just, wow.

  11. 11.   aiabx Says:
    February 28th, 2006 at 2:18 pm

    Hey Squid, the answer is yes, you should be able to see M101 with binos. However: you will probably need to get out under a dark sky somewhere, and you will probably only see the bright core. But it’s still pretty damned cool to feel those photons finish their 25 million light year journey on your retina.

  12. 12.   Eighthman Says:
    February 28th, 2006 at 2:21 pm

    “…the original image is 12,000 x 16,000 pixels in size, making it the largest image of a spiral galaxy ever produced.”

    Nope. This is, at 21,904 by 14,454 pixels:
    http://www.robgendlerastropics.com/M31NMmosaic.html

    So say S&T: http://skyandtelescope.com/news/article_1685_1.asp

  13. 13.   PK Says:
    February 28th, 2006 at 5:28 pm

    I’m going through the 63MB right now and it’s fantastic!

  14. 14.   R2K Says:
    February 28th, 2006 at 6:20 pm

    You know that is the first image I have seen of you, and I had always pictured you much older! Like Carl Sagan perhaps.

    R2K

  15. 15.   Melusine Says:
    February 28th, 2006 at 10:42 pm

    Imagine what the sky must look like from a planet near there…

    It would be mind-blowing!

    Kudos to Hubble and the folks that put this together. Amazing work.

  16. 16.   The Bad Astronomer Says:
    February 28th, 2006 at 10:46 pm

    Yeah, they re-released the press release :) and I had to fix the Huffingont Post article. Figures, I forgot to fix this version! I’ll take care of it.

  17. 17.   Michael Baker Says:
    March 1st, 2006 at 7:54 am

    Wow! Truly Incredible. BTW Phil I thought you were speaking somewhere in Texas this March… was looking forward to it but now I cannot find the event on the calendar?

  18. 18.   Caio de Gaia Says:
    March 1st, 2006 at 8:34 am

    Well, I was insane to download the big thing. I’ve been looking at it, lot’s of stuf there. Can anyone tell me what is the green thing near the middle of the lower left panel in this image I build from it?

  19. 19.   Caio de Gaia Says:
    March 1st, 2006 at 8:35 am

    ooops, the image is here

    http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/3059/1738/1600/m101c.jpg

  20. 20.   TJ Says:
    March 1st, 2006 at 8:59 am

    I can gaze into this image for days. So amazing.

    Thanks Phil.

  21. 21.   Aetiology Says:
    March 1st, 2006 at 9:02 am

    Tangled Bank #48

    Welcome to Tangled Bank #48! Tons of good stuff to share with you today. I considered a number of themes, including the invisible theme (aka, none at all), but decided on “songs by groups that may have been in my…

  22. 22.   RAD Says:
    March 1st, 2006 at 12:32 pm

    Thanks for the new wallpaper!!

  23. 23.   Dwight Says:
    March 2nd, 2006 at 10:28 am

    And as you’re gazing at this incredible picture, imagine that somewhere among the trillion stars there are planetary systems with intelligent life (does ours qualify?) with “people” gazing through their telescopes at the Milky Way pondering the same questions as we are.

  24. 24.   sean Says:
    March 3rd, 2006 at 11:37 pm

    dwight the chances are good. excelent picture wish i could get that throught my scope

  25. 25.   Supernova PTF 11kly « Alexander Safir Says:
    September 1st, 2011 at 1:15 am

    [...] Phil Plait of Bad Astronomy did a write up of the various observations which have been made to date. I would recommend checking that out for some great comparison of Type 1a Supernovae, early imagery of what was to become PTF 11kly, and plenty of linked papers and articles. See also his article from 2006 about M101. [...]

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • The hearts of space
      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA?
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • The hearts of space | Bad Astronomy
      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA? | Bad Astronomy
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts | Bad Astronomy
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair | Bad Astronomy
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us