<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Randi doing much better</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:23:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irishman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/comment-page-1/#comment-13153</link>
		<dc:creator>Irishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 16:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/#comment-13153</guid>
		<description>No, Simon, those claims were evidence-based.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, Simon, those claims were evidence-based.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/comment-page-1/#comment-13152</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 15:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/#comment-13152</guid>
		<description>I also wish Randi a &#039;Swift&#039; recovery! He is an international treasure and we need more of his ilk, and indeed of the BA ilk!
Which reminds me, several posters on this blog made the uncannily accurate prediction that Hoagland would leap in identifying alien structures from MRO images as soon as they were out, and lo! it was so! Does such an amazing prescience qualify for Randi&#039;s million dollar prize? ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also wish Randi a &#8216;Swift&#8217; recovery! He is an international treasure and we need more of his ilk, and indeed of the BA ilk!<br />
Which reminds me, several posters on this blog made the uncannily accurate prediction that Hoagland would leap in identifying alien structures from MRO images as soon as they were out, and lo! it was so! Does such an amazing prescience qualify for Randi&#8217;s million dollar prize? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Perron</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/comment-page-1/#comment-13143</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Perron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/#comment-13143</guid>
		<description>On Coast to Coast Phil made a big deal about looking at evidence, yet he himself refuses to read sTARBABY by astronomer Dennis Rawlins. If Phil truly had a truth seeking open mind he would read sTARBABY.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Coast to Coast Phil made a big deal about looking at evidence, yet he himself refuses to read sTARBABY by astronomer Dennis Rawlins. If Phil truly had a truth seeking open mind he would read sTARBABY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Perron</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/comment-page-1/#comment-13147</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Perron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 04:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/#comment-13147</guid>
		<description>Sadly Phil is has revealed himself to be nothing more than an agenda filled coward, afraid to see and admit the truth, he continues to remain in total denial of the fraudulent ways of his guru. How scientific is it to not even look at the evidence ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sadly Phil is has revealed himself to be nothing more than an agenda filled coward, afraid to see and admit the truth, he continues to remain in total denial of the fraudulent ways of his guru. How scientific is it to not even look at the evidence ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/comment-page-1/#comment-13148</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:14:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/#comment-13148</guid>
		<description>:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/comment-page-1/#comment-13149</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/#comment-13149</guid>
		<description>sorry for getting off-topic there.

I&#039;m glad Randi&#039;s making a good recovery.

I, too, read Swift on a weekly basis, after taking a week to catch up on the archives.  Let me tell you- that was a LOT of information and good thinking to take in all at once.  And I have you to thank for that, Mr. BA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry for getting off-topic there.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad Randi&#8217;s making a good recovery.</p>
<p>I, too, read Swift on a weekly basis, after taking a week to catch up on the archives.  Let me tell you- that was a LOT of information and good thinking to take in all at once.  And I have you to thank for that, Mr. BA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/comment-page-1/#comment-13150</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/#comment-13150</guid>
		<description>Ugh.  Silly me, I started reading some more of Hoagland&#039;s gibberish spouting off about another ancient extraterrestrial race&#039;s ruins on Iapetus.  Either he&#039;s entirely clueless about how impact craters affect each other, or he&#039;s a complete loony-toon.  I admit, I don&#039;t have a degree in geology or astrophysics, but even I can understand what would cause the supposed &quot;ruins&quot; on Iapetus.  Not to mention, he&#039;s put a copyright date on an image he enlarged from an enlargement of an image he got from the Cassini mission.  Isn&#039;t that slightly illegal? Unless, of course, that he [i]made[/i] the image in question, which makes it completely bogus- but of course, that won&#039;t stop people from thinking he&#039;s got the right answer, and it won&#039;t stop him from pushing his particular brand of lunacy/idiocy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugh.  Silly me, I started reading some more of Hoagland&#8217;s gibberish spouting off about another ancient extraterrestrial race&#8217;s ruins on Iapetus.  Either he&#8217;s entirely clueless about how impact craters affect each other, or he&#8217;s a complete loony-toon.  I admit, I don&#8217;t have a degree in geology or astrophysics, but even I can understand what would cause the supposed &#8220;ruins&#8221; on Iapetus.  Not to mention, he&#8217;s put a copyright date on an image he enlarged from an enlargement of an image he got from the Cassini mission.  Isn&#8217;t that slightly illegal? Unless, of course, that he [i]made[/i] the image in question, which makes it completely bogus- but of course, that won&#8217;t stop people from thinking he&#8217;s got the right answer, and it won&#8217;t stop him from pushing his particular brand of lunacy/idiocy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/comment-page-1/#comment-13151</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/#comment-13151</guid>
		<description>He sounds a bit like Burl Ives.  Glad he&#039;s doing better.  I don&#039;t understand Indiana Jone&#039;s lost map of Babylon.  I like his beard, you can&#039;t really be a conjuror without one.  He has been a big influence on my outlook on things.  As for Sylvia Browne I can&#039;t believe they can even be mentioned in the same sentence.  Sylvia isn&#039;t even competent as a phoney, but the Amazing Randi can be both entertaining and thought provoking.  Too bad there is only one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He sounds a bit like Burl Ives.  Glad he&#8217;s doing better.  I don&#8217;t understand Indiana Jone&#8217;s lost map of Babylon.  I like his beard, you can&#8217;t really be a conjuror without one.  He has been a big influence on my outlook on things.  As for Sylvia Browne I can&#8217;t believe they can even be mentioned in the same sentence.  Sylvia isn&#8217;t even competent as a phoney, but the Amazing Randi can be both entertaining and thought provoking.  Too bad there is only one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ericnh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/comment-page-1/#comment-13142</link>
		<dc:creator>ericnh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 16:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/#comment-13142</guid>
		<description>Hope Randi comes back soon, I love reading his commentaries.

BTW BA, saw on the Coast to Coast AM website that you&#039;re gonna be a guest 3/26 -- is it true?  I heard Richard Hoagland&#039;s &quot;evidence&quot; of &quot;geometric&quot; (artificial) structures in the test photos just released from the MRO team, and as usual after looking at the photos I don&#039;t see whatever he sees (maybe I should recalibrate my brain&#039;s pareidolia perception).  Please smack his arguments with a Noodly Appendage.  I&#039;m just waiting for the real photos to trip him up.  Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hope Randi comes back soon, I love reading his commentaries.</p>
<p>BTW BA, saw on the Coast to Coast AM website that you&#8217;re gonna be a guest 3/26 &#8212; is it true?  I heard Richard Hoagland&#8217;s &#8220;evidence&#8221; of &#8220;geometric&#8221; (artificial) structures in the test photos just released from the MRO team, and as usual after looking at the photos I don&#8217;t see whatever he sees (maybe I should recalibrate my brain&#8217;s pareidolia perception).  Please smack his arguments with a Noodly Appendage.  I&#8217;m just waiting for the real photos to trip him up.  Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolverine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/comment-page-1/#comment-13144</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolverine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/#comment-13144</guid>
		<description>Great news, and best wishes to Randi for a speedy recovery.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great news, and best wishes to Randi for a speedy recovery.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian Burnham</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/comment-page-1/#comment-13146</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian Burnham</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/#comment-13146</guid>
		<description>Pass on the good wishes of us posters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pass on the good wishes of us posters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/comment-page-1/#comment-13145</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/03/24/randi-doing-much-better/#comment-13145</guid>
		<description>I was just watching his interview with Penn and Teller on the B******* season one disc.  He said he was 75 years old and that was a few years ago.  He looks great for his age.  I&#039;m happy he is recovering and I wish him well.  We need James Randi. We really do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just watching his interview with Penn and Teller on the B******* season one disc.  He said he was 75 years old and that was a few years ago.  He looks great for his age.  I&#8217;m happy he is recovering and I wish him well.  We need James Randi. We really do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 12:41:43 -->
