<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nasa sells soft drinks&#8230; with coca???</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/14/nasa-sells-soft-drinks-with-coca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/14/nasa-sells-soft-drinks-with-coca/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:36:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Yakovlev1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/14/nasa-sells-soft-drinks-with-coca/comment-page-1/#comment-14122</link>
		<dc:creator>Yakovlev1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/14/nasa-sells-soft-drinks-with-coca/#comment-14122</guid>
		<description>http://amiloride-5ity.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://amiloride-5ity.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://amiloride-5ity.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: worldpharmacy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/14/nasa-sells-soft-drinks-with-coca/comment-page-1/#comment-14123</link>
		<dc:creator>worldpharmacy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2006 07:04:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/14/nasa-sells-soft-drinks-with-coca/#comment-14123</guid>
		<description>worldpharmacy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>worldpharmacy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rapdentious</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/14/nasa-sells-soft-drinks-with-coca/comment-page-1/#comment-14119</link>
		<dc:creator>Rapdentious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 07:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/14/nasa-sells-soft-drinks-with-coca/#comment-14119</guid>
		<description>Thanks for that Max.
Jupiter and the inner moons have never been more breathtaking to me than one night 35 years ago when I was priviledged to have an evening with the 30&quot; Leuschner.  By coincidence the four moons formed a perfect spiral away from Jupiter and towards us! What are the chances of that.  It gave a sense of 3 dimensionality I didn&#039;t think possible through a telescope. The vivid colours made it a truly spectacular sight.

You mentioned earlier it has been speculated that black holes might be &quot;evaporating&quot; matter to another dimension.  If there is no apparent limit to the ultimate size of a black hole, is it conceivable that CBHs have swallowed whole galaxies whose mass, while in another dimension, is still somehow having a gravitational effect--as in the &quot;missing mass&quot; of the universe?  (You can tell I&#039;m way over my head here).
Cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for that Max.<br />
Jupiter and the inner moons have never been more breathtaking to me than one night 35 years ago when I was priviledged to have an evening with the 30&#8243; Leuschner.  By coincidence the four moons formed a perfect spiral away from Jupiter and towards us! What are the chances of that.  It gave a sense of 3 dimensionality I didn&#8217;t think possible through a telescope. The vivid colours made it a truly spectacular sight.</p>
<p>You mentioned earlier it has been speculated that black holes might be &#8220;evaporating&#8221; matter to another dimension.  If there is no apparent limit to the ultimate size of a black hole, is it conceivable that CBHs have swallowed whole galaxies whose mass, while in another dimension, is still somehow having a gravitational effect&#8211;as in the &#8220;missing mass&#8221; of the universe?  (You can tell I&#8217;m way over my head here).<br />
Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobby</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/14/nasa-sells-soft-drinks-with-coca/comment-page-1/#comment-14120</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/14/nasa-sells-soft-drinks-with-coca/#comment-14120</guid>
		<description>hmm, sorry, unclosed tag on that last bit, back to the old html books for me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm, sorry, unclosed tag on that last bit, back to the old html books for me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nobby</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/14/nasa-sells-soft-drinks-with-coca/comment-page-1/#comment-14121</link>
		<dc:creator>Nobby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Apr 2006 00:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/14/nasa-sells-soft-drinks-with-coca/#comment-14121</guid>
		<description>regards understanding Black Holes.
During my degree we covered spinning black holes and the spacetime warping that results. That evening I ended up a *little* bit drunk and was sat thinking about the dimensions. Ended up sat upside down on the sofa with my head just off the floor. After about half an hour I suddenly realised what was happening, then passed out and fell on my head. Since then I can just about understand what happens in a spinning black hole, unfortunately the technique doesn&#039;t help with the maths. That&#039;s still down to lots of tiny indicies.
DARE to resist? &lt;b&gt;Drugs &lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;Are &lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;Really &lt;/b&gt;&lt;b&gt;Excelent?&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>regards understanding Black Holes.<br />
During my degree we covered spinning black holes and the spacetime warping that results. That evening I ended up a *little* bit drunk and was sat thinking about the dimensions. Ended up sat upside down on the sofa with my head just off the floor. After about half an hour I suddenly realised what was happening, then passed out and fell on my head. Since then I can just about understand what happens in a spinning black hole, unfortunately the technique doesn&#8217;t help with the maths. That&#8217;s still down to lots of tiny indicies.<br />
DARE to resist? <b>Drugs </b><b>Are </b><b>Really </b><b>Excelent?</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MystikPhish</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/14/nasa-sells-soft-drinks-with-coca/comment-page-1/#comment-14139</link>
		<dc:creator>MystikPhish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 22:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/14/nasa-sells-soft-drinks-with-coca/#comment-14139</guid>
		<description>Rapdentious,

Regarding your question about whether the central black hole in a galaxy would be more discernible in an &quot;axle-on&quot; view... The technical term I think is &quot;Active Galactic Nuclei&quot;, try a web search as there&#039;s a lot more info than I could come up with here.

For galaxies that qualify, you could say that they are easier to see (not with your eyes I guess...)

Here&#039;s a brief intro from teh NASA site:
,a href=&quot;http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l1/active_galaxies.html&quot; title=&quot;Active Galactic Nuclei&quot;&gt;Active Galactic Nuclei</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rapdentious,</p>
<p>Regarding your question about whether the central black hole in a galaxy would be more discernible in an &#8220;axle-on&#8221; view&#8230; The technical term I think is &#8220;Active Galactic Nuclei&#8221;, try a web search as there&#8217;s a lot more info than I could come up with here.</p>
<p>For galaxies that qualify, you could say that they are easier to see (not with your eyes I guess&#8230;)</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a brief intro from teh NASA site:<br />
,a href=&#8221;http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l1/active_galaxies.html&#8221; title=&#8221;Active Galactic Nuclei&#8221;&gt;Active Galactic Nuclei</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irishman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/14/nasa-sells-soft-drinks-with-coca/comment-page-1/#comment-14142</link>
		<dc:creator>Irishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2006 20:09:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/14/nasa-sells-soft-drinks-with-coca/#comment-14142</guid>
		<description>But cardoso, you&#039;re the one who made the comparison to Miller Lite.  Miller Lite is beer every bit as much as other beer - that is to say, American beers, which have lower alcohol content than, say, German beers.  The &quot;Lite&quot; has nothing to do with alcohol content, which is the ingredient of consideration.

A more appropriate comparison &lt;i&gt;might&lt;/i&gt; be O&#039;Doule&#039;s , the &quot;non-alcoholic&quot; beer (that actually has about 0.5% alcohol).  It&#039;s touted as the alternative to regular beer for non-drinkers who want the &quot;refreshing&quot; taste of a beer. (Gag.)  It takes a lot more O&#039;Doule&#039;s to get drunk - even at .08% blood content.  But even that will get you drunk if you work at it.  (Not aware of anyone getting drunk of O&#039;Doule&#039;s and the like - people who intend to get drunk use something harder, people who drink it aren&#039;t trying, so likely don&#039;t imbibe fast enough.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But cardoso, you&#8217;re the one who made the comparison to Miller Lite.  Miller Lite is beer every bit as much as other beer &#8211; that is to say, American beers, which have lower alcohol content than, say, German beers.  The &#8220;Lite&#8221; has nothing to do with alcohol content, which is the ingredient of consideration.</p>
<p>A more appropriate comparison <i>might</i> be O&#8217;Doule&#8217;s , the &#8220;non-alcoholic&#8221; beer (that actually has about 0.5% alcohol).  It&#8217;s touted as the alternative to regular beer for non-drinkers who want the &#8220;refreshing&#8221; taste of a beer. (Gag.)  It takes a lot more O&#8217;Doule&#8217;s to get drunk &#8211; even at .08% blood content.  But even that will get you drunk if you work at it.  (Not aware of anyone getting drunk of O&#8217;Doule&#8217;s and the like &#8211; people who intend to get drunk use something harder, people who drink it aren&#8217;t trying, so likely don&#8217;t imbibe fast enough.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
