<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Trek XI rumors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:46:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chance</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-14543</link>
		<dc:creator>Chance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 17:52:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/#comment-14543</guid>
		<description>I am really unhappy about this. Although I grew up with TOS, and I did like ENT, I cannot understand why this is a good idea. I would really much rather see a movie set around VOY, DS9 or even a mixed cast. They have so much talent just laying around, characters we know, but could still see in a different. That&#039;s what I want to see, let&#039;s not go to the past, move forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am really unhappy about this. Although I grew up with TOS, and I did like ENT, I cannot understand why this is a good idea. I would really much rather see a movie set around VOY, DS9 or even a mixed cast. They have so much talent just laying around, characters we know, but could still see in a different. That&#8217;s what I want to see, let&#8217;s not go to the past, move forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morel</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-14542</link>
		<dc:creator>Morel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 May 2006 06:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/#comment-14542</guid>
		<description>Prequals suck.. Everyone who is in control of Star Trek sucks, and there the onloy ones who don&#039;t think Prequals suck.

 It amazes me that they&#039;re gonna do this. Put the last nail in the coffin why don&#039;t you. This movie will tank, and they&#039;ll blame Star Trek..

 STOP making prequals, make a ST:TNG with Q with a warning that the entire galaxies gonna die from some dark evil old enemy..  I&#039;d watch that..

 Idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prequals suck.. Everyone who is in control of Star Trek sucks, and there the onloy ones who don&#8217;t think Prequals suck.</p>
<p> It amazes me that they&#8217;re gonna do this. Put the last nail in the coffin why don&#8217;t you. This movie will tank, and they&#8217;ll blame Star Trek..</p>
<p> STOP making prequals, make a ST:TNG with Q with a warning that the entire galaxies gonna die from some dark evil old enemy..  I&#8217;d watch that..</p>
<p> Idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SFwriter</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-14528</link>
		<dc:creator>SFwriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 18:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/#comment-14528</guid>
		<description>Bill and Leonard are not up to doing another Trek movie.  Let&#039;s at least be realistic people.  They&#039;re both 75 years old, and though Shatner may still ride horses competitively, Nimoy seems a bit sedentary, verging on brittle lately.  You could never get insurance for a movie with those two in it.

What is really called for here is actors like Scott Bakula (Archer), Jolene Blalock (T&#039;Pol), Connor Trinneer (Trip), Dominic Keating (Reed), Anthony Montgomery (Mayweather), Linda Parks (Hoshi), John Billingsley (Dr. Phlox), and let the un-old, un-ancient, actually YOUNG crew take a shot at the helm.

That series was damned good, and what TOS would have been, if shot with current technology.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://img103.imageshack.us/img103/751/directtodvdtrailerbanner1copy0.jpg&quot; title=&quot;Save Enterprise with Direct to DVD&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill and Leonard are not up to doing another Trek movie.  Let&#8217;s at least be realistic people.  They&#8217;re both 75 years old, and though Shatner may still ride horses competitively, Nimoy seems a bit sedentary, verging on brittle lately.  You could never get insurance for a movie with those two in it.</p>
<p>What is really called for here is actors like Scott Bakula (Archer), Jolene Blalock (T&#8217;Pol), Connor Trinneer (Trip), Dominic Keating (Reed), Anthony Montgomery (Mayweather), Linda Parks (Hoshi), John Billingsley (Dr. Phlox), and let the un-old, un-ancient, actually YOUNG crew take a shot at the helm.</p>
<p>That series was damned good, and what TOS would have been, if shot with current technology.</p>
<p><a href="http://img103.imageshack.us/img103/751/directtodvdtrailerbanner1copy0.jpg" title="Save Enterprise with Direct to DVD" rel="nofollow"></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexander Case</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-14529</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexander Case</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2006 00:00:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/#comment-14529</guid>
		<description>A Captain Sulu movie (set on the Excelcior - sp) sounds good to me. Frankly, the Excelscior set from Star Trek VI is one of my favorite bridge sets from any series, second only to the bridge of the Arcadia from the Captain Harlock series, and the bridge of the Enterprise-A from ST-VI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Captain Sulu movie (set on the Excelcior &#8211; sp) sounds good to me. Frankly, the Excelscior set from Star Trek VI is one of my favorite bridge sets from any series, second only to the bridge of the Arcadia from the Captain Harlock series, and the bridge of the Enterprise-A from ST-VI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-14530</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 22:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/#comment-14530</guid>
		<description>I remember a parody of Star Trek movies (on the Simpsons) with progressivly higher roman numerals it was something like &quot;Star Trek, so very old&quot;...then it has the original cast as a bunch of geezers.  Maybe this is what they&#039;ll do?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember a parody of Star Trek movies (on the Simpsons) with progressivly higher roman numerals it was something like &#8220;Star Trek, so very old&#8221;&#8230;then it has the original cast as a bunch of geezers.  Maybe this is what they&#8217;ll do?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: justme</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-14531</link>
		<dc:creator>justme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 21:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/#comment-14531</guid>
		<description>How about the Captain Sulu spinoff that&#039;s been talked about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the Captain Sulu spinoff that&#8217;s been talked about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Centipede</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-14541</link>
		<dc:creator>The Centipede</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 14:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/#comment-14541</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m about to commit sacrilege here, but just because Joss Whedon had a good idea for thirteen episodes (&lt;i&gt;Firefly&lt;/i&gt;) doesn&#039;t mean he can do wonders for &lt;i&gt;Trek&lt;/i&gt;.  As Karen said, Whedon&#039;s got his own particular style and it wouldn&#039;t fit too well in the human near-utopia Roddenberry intended.

Now, taking a more character-oriented BSG angle might work, especially seeing now that the UFP is decidedly conservative in its values (no augmentation, no cybernetization, etc.).  A reboot might work--what that fan production group has come up with is pretty amazing--but the most important thing is that it not be 90 minutes of special effects (re: &lt;i&gt;Star Wars&lt;/i&gt;) because, as we&#039;ll probably agree, it&#039;s not the point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m about to commit sacrilege here, but just because Joss Whedon had a good idea for thirteen episodes (<i>Firefly</i>) doesn&#8217;t mean he can do wonders for <i>Trek</i>.  As Karen said, Whedon&#8217;s got his own particular style and it wouldn&#8217;t fit too well in the human near-utopia Roddenberry intended.</p>
<p>Now, taking a more character-oriented BSG angle might work, especially seeing now that the UFP is decidedly conservative in its values (no augmentation, no cybernetization, etc.).  A reboot might work&#8211;what that fan production group has come up with is pretty amazing&#8211;but the most important thing is that it not be 90 minutes of special effects (re: <i>Star Wars</i>) because, as we&#8217;ll probably agree, it&#8217;s not the point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-14540</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/#comment-14540</guid>
		<description>I wrote an open letter to him on my site - maybe he will read it one day :&gt;

www.chrissaad.com/chris/trek11</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote an open letter to him on my site &#8211; maybe he will read it one day :&gt;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chrissaad.com/chris/trek11" rel="nofollow">http://www.chrissaad.com/chris/trek11</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Ingram</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-14539</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Ingram</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 02:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/#comment-14539</guid>
		<description>*hoping for DS9 movie* *hoping for DS9 movie* *hoping for DS9 movie* *hoping for DS9 movie*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*hoping for DS9 movie* *hoping for DS9 movie* *hoping for DS9 movie* *hoping for DS9 movie*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toren</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-14538</link>
		<dc:creator>Toren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 00:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/#comment-14538</guid>
		<description>Yeah they could make a fully CGI animated Trek movie! Like Shrek but with the the Sh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah they could make a fully CGI animated Trek movie! Like Shrek but with the the Sh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chip</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-14537</link>
		<dc:creator>Chip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 00:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/#comment-14537</guid>
		<description>If it&#039;s to be about young Kirk &amp; Spock, have William Shatner and Leonard Nemoy portray them throughout the film, but then take every image of them from the first series (late 60s,) and place these images in a computer as a source.  Then, over a moving grid on the current Shatner and Nemoy graft the earlier images of them over the current actors. (As they did to create the character Golem in Lord of the Rings.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it&#8217;s to be about young Kirk &amp; Spock, have William Shatner and Leonard Nemoy portray them throughout the film, but then take every image of them from the first series (late 60s,) and place these images in a computer as a source.  Then, over a moving grid on the current Shatner and Nemoy graft the earlier images of them over the current actors. (As they did to create the character Golem in Lord of the Rings.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-14536</link>
		<dc:creator>Karen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 23:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/#comment-14536</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s let Joss continue to give us his own wonderful visions, instead of making him run in Roddenberry&#039;s harness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s let Joss continue to give us his own wonderful visions, instead of making him run in Roddenberry&#8217;s harness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Merovingian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-14535</link>
		<dc:creator>Merovingian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/#comment-14535</guid>
		<description>The plot thickens?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The plot thickens?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake Stacey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-14534</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake Stacey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 22:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/#comment-14534</guid>
		<description>Maybe they&#039;ll hire &lt;i&gt;Joss Whedon&lt;/i&gt; to do the screenplay.

Heck, let&#039;s petition to make it happen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they&#8217;ll hire <i>Joss Whedon</i> to do the screenplay.</p>
<p>Heck, let&#8217;s petition to make it happen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-14533</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/#comment-14533</guid>
		<description>Maybe they&#039;ll actually hire writers for a change and come up with a decent plot, instead of having 90 minutes of special effects and not much else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they&#8217;ll actually hire writers for a change and come up with a decent plot, instead of having 90 minutes of special effects and not much else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Siefert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/comment-page-1/#comment-14532</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Siefert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 20:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/04/26/more-trek-xi-rumors/#comment-14532</guid>
		<description>Maybe they will do something original, like making a movie, set on Enterprise, but with a bunch of new characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they will do something original, like making a movie, set on Enterprise, but with a bunch of new characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 15:58:50 -->
