<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More on the SciFi channel doomsday show</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/14/more-on-the-scifi-channel-doomsday-show/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/14/more-on-the-scifi-channel-doomsday-show/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:51:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shawn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/14/more-on-the-scifi-channel-doomsday-show/comment-page-1/#comment-15991</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:47:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/14/more-on-the-scifi-channel-doomsday-show/#comment-15991</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t these shows that broadcast doomsday stories always get extremely high ratings?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t these shows that broadcast doomsday stories always get extremely high ratings?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melusine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/14/more-on-the-scifi-channel-doomsday-show/comment-page-1/#comment-15992</link>
		<dc:creator>Melusine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 13:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/14/more-on-the-scifi-channel-doomsday-show/#comment-15992</guid>
		<description>Ok, other people mentioned it in the other entry--about the Sun &quot;exploding.&quot; Considering that the demise of the Sun is certain death for Earth, I don&#039;t understand why this concept can&#039;t be conveyed correctly. The Science Channel did a good visual representation of this. I see the word &quot;explosive&quot; so often regarding the Sun&#039;s daily activities, and that&#039;s OK, but it confuses the visual concept of it becoming very large and enveloping our planet. I guess they don&#039;t let scientists vet the program before it runs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, other people mentioned it in the other entry&#8211;about the Sun &#8220;exploding.&#8221; Considering that the demise of the Sun is certain death for Earth, I don&#8217;t understand why this concept can&#8217;t be conveyed correctly. The Science Channel did a good visual representation of this. I see the word &#8220;explosive&#8221; so often regarding the Sun&#8217;s daily activities, and that&#8217;s OK, but it confuses the visual concept of it becoming very large and enveloping our planet. I guess they don&#8217;t let scientists vet the program before it runs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melusine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/14/more-on-the-scifi-channel-doomsday-show/comment-page-1/#comment-15993</link>
		<dc:creator>Melusine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 12:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/14/more-on-the-scifi-channel-doomsday-show/#comment-15993</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Karen says:

Wow, Phil - you look so â€¦ cheerful describing the destructive capability of a gamma ray burst!&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not just Phil, Seth Shostak and Michio Kaku looked positively cheerful, too. Well, Kaku, who I like a lot, is always the cheerful, telegenic physicist. The flip side is sounding dour or alarmist, which is better left to the more immediate doomsday scenarios such as how we are killing off species and raping the earth. I appreciated the lack of smiles there. Regrettably I fell asleep during the virus segment, so I&#039;ll have to watch it again, but I hope some viewers thought, &quot;Gamma ray bursts--yeah cool!&quot; and do some online researching about them. Too, I liked the comment by Phil about aliens hurling a rock at us being a good way to cause general mayhem on our &quot;mudball,&quot; as Kaku calls Earth. :-)

From a telegenic perspective, you did good.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Maksutov said:

The narration contained numerous scientific errors, such as, â€œSolar flares get released when the Sun gets overloaded with the magnetic energy itâ€™s constantly burning.â€&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Mak, I especially liked that segment (my electromagnetic storm-desire post never posted here, though admittedly I sounded like I welcome another Canada scenario), but I don&#039;t think that&#039;s a way-off comment. In the interest of time information gets sliced and diced and sometimes oversimplified, but to quote from the April Sky &amp; Telescope by solar physicist Carolus Schrijver who works on the TRACE mission:

&lt;blockquote&gt;We now understand these so-alled coronal loops as a consequence of the magnetic forces dominating the corona....Heating the corona is just one of the roles played by the electrical currents coursing through coronal loops. When the largest of these immense currents becomes unstable they cause solar flares...we are far from understanding how these solar flares release their energy...we do know that much, if not most, of a flare&#039;s energy goes into generating large numbers of ions and electrons, which are accelerated to speeds of light. These charged particles race along the magnetic field away from the flare-initiation sites...the coronal gases and those waves exert pressure on the magnetic field. In most of the corono the magnetic field is strong enough to resist these forces, and the gas remains in closed loops...a few times each day, such events force the magnetic field to snap open above as much as 10 percent of the upper corona...[then he goes on to discuss CMEs]&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Earlier he says, that we &quot;are gradually learning to appreciate all the ways in which magnetic activity within the Sun&#039;s atmosphere spreads into interplanetary space...&quot; So, how would you briefly sum it up into one sentence? And what were some other errors?  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Karen says:</p>
<p>Wow, Phil &#8211; you look so â€¦ cheerful describing the destructive capability of a gamma ray burst!</p></blockquote>
<p>Not just Phil, Seth Shostak and Michio Kaku looked positively cheerful, too. Well, Kaku, who I like a lot, is always the cheerful, telegenic physicist. The flip side is sounding dour or alarmist, which is better left to the more immediate doomsday scenarios such as how we are killing off species and raping the earth. I appreciated the lack of smiles there. Regrettably I fell asleep during the virus segment, so I&#8217;ll have to watch it again, but I hope some viewers thought, &#8220;Gamma ray bursts&#8211;yeah cool!&#8221; and do some online researching about them. Too, I liked the comment by Phil about aliens hurling a rock at us being a good way to cause general mayhem on our &#8220;mudball,&#8221; as Kaku calls Earth. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>From a telegenic perspective, you did good.</p>
<blockquote><p>Maksutov said:</p>
<p>The narration contained numerous scientific errors, such as, â€œSolar flares get released when the Sun gets overloaded with the magnetic energy itâ€™s constantly burning.â€</p></blockquote>
<p>Mak, I especially liked that segment (my electromagnetic storm-desire post never posted here, though admittedly I sounded like I welcome another Canada scenario), but I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s a way-off comment. In the interest of time information gets sliced and diced and sometimes oversimplified, but to quote from the April Sky &amp; Telescope by solar physicist Carolus Schrijver who works on the TRACE mission:</p>
<blockquote><p>We now understand these so-alled coronal loops as a consequence of the magnetic forces dominating the corona&#8230;.Heating the corona is just one of the roles played by the electrical currents coursing through coronal loops. When the largest of these immense currents becomes unstable they cause solar flares&#8230;we are far from understanding how these solar flares release their energy&#8230;we do know that much, if not most, of a flare&#8217;s energy goes into generating large numbers of ions and electrons, which are accelerated to speeds of light. These charged particles race along the magnetic field away from the flare-initiation sites&#8230;the coronal gases and those waves exert pressure on the magnetic field. In most of the corono the magnetic field is strong enough to resist these forces, and the gas remains in closed loops&#8230;a few times each day, such events force the magnetic field to snap open above as much as 10 percent of the upper corona&#8230;[then he goes on to discuss CMEs]</p></blockquote>
<p>Earlier he says, that we &#8220;are gradually learning to appreciate all the ways in which magnetic activity within the Sun&#8217;s atmosphere spreads into interplanetary space&#8230;&#8221; So, how would you briefly sum it up into one sentence? And what were some other errors?  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/14/more-on-the-scifi-channel-doomsday-show/comment-page-1/#comment-15994</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 06:05:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/14/more-on-the-scifi-channel-doomsday-show/#comment-15994</guid>
		<description>:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maksutov</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/14/more-on-the-scifi-channel-doomsday-show/comment-page-1/#comment-15995</link>
		<dc:creator>Maksutov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/14/more-on-the-scifi-channel-doomsday-show/#comment-15995</guid>
		<description>All I can say is the program needed more Phil and less sensationalism and credulity.

Many of the videos segments looked very familiar (of course with the movie clips), but for the non-movie clips, especially after they shown for the third, fourth, etc., time.

The narration contained numerous scientific errors, such as, &quot;Solar flares get released when the Sun gets overloaded with the magnetic energy it&#039;s constantly burning.&quot;

On the plus side, it&#039;s always good to see Kimberly Weaver.

And the BA really got into that GRB section, (with a big smile) &quot;It could boil the oceans, it could melt the crust, this is real, you know, end-of-the-world kind of stuff!&quot;

GRB: Grinning, but Realistic Badastronomer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I can say is the program needed more Phil and less sensationalism and credulity.</p>
<p>Many of the videos segments looked very familiar (of course with the movie clips), but for the non-movie clips, especially after they shown for the third, fourth, etc., time.</p>
<p>The narration contained numerous scientific errors, such as, &#8220;Solar flares get released when the Sun gets overloaded with the magnetic energy it&#8217;s constantly burning.&#8221;</p>
<p>On the plus side, it&#8217;s always good to see Kimberly Weaver.</p>
<p>And the BA really got into that GRB section, (with a big smile) &#8220;It could boil the oceans, it could melt the crust, this is real, you know, end-of-the-world kind of stuff!&#8221;</p>
<p>GRB: Grinning, but Realistic Badastronomer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John B. Sandlin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/14/more-on-the-scifi-channel-doomsday-show/comment-page-1/#comment-15996</link>
		<dc:creator>John B. Sandlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:56:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/14/more-on-the-scifi-channel-doomsday-show/#comment-15996</guid>
		<description>I must echo Karen - You obviously enjoyed talking about the GRB.  The good news: the odds of a Milkyway GRB being pointed at us - very low.

jbs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must echo Karen &#8211; You obviously enjoyed talking about the GRB.  The good news: the odds of a Milkyway GRB being pointed at us &#8211; very low.</p>
<p>jbs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim F.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/14/more-on-the-scifi-channel-doomsday-show/comment-page-1/#comment-16002</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim F.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/14/more-on-the-scifi-channel-doomsday-show/#comment-16002</guid>
		<description>For those of you who - like me - forgot to program TiVo in time, there&#039;s another showing on the 25th.  Until then, I&#039;m just going to cover my ears and say, &quot;la, la, la.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who &#8211; like me &#8211; forgot to program TiVo in time, there&#8217;s another showing on the 25th.  Until then, I&#8217;m just going to cover my ears and say, &#8220;la, la, la.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
