<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another lunar impact!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/19/another-lunar-impact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/19/another-lunar-impact/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:51:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/19/another-lunar-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-16242</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 06:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/19/another-lunar-impact/#comment-16242</guid>
		<description>Thanks, that really helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, that really helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/19/another-lunar-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-16241</link>
		<dc:creator>PK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 23:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/19/another-lunar-impact/#comment-16241</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Pete says: What makes the flash?&lt;/i&gt;

Despite the short response by Irishman, this is actually a good question. There are two answers, (1) thermodynamical, and (2) microscopical:

(1) Thermodynamically, the meteor and the moon rock heat up to very high temperatures right after the moment of impact. Since rock is approximately a black body, it emits black body radiation, which depends on the temperature. If the temperature is high enough, this radiation is in the optical spectrum. However, this is not really an explanation, just a phenomenological description. To really understand what&#039;s going on, we need to look at the atoms and electrons in the rocks:

(2) Microscopically, shockwaves through the rock excite the atoms and molecules in the rock to higher energy levels. When the electrons relax to lower energy levels, they emit photons. Hence the light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Pete says: What makes the flash?</i></p>
<p>Despite the short response by Irishman, this is actually a good question. There are two answers, (1) thermodynamical, and (2) microscopical:</p>
<p>(1) Thermodynamically, the meteor and the moon rock heat up to very high temperatures right after the moment of impact. Since rock is approximately a black body, it emits black body radiation, which depends on the temperature. If the temperature is high enough, this radiation is in the optical spectrum. However, this is not really an explanation, just a phenomenological description. To really understand what&#8217;s going on, we need to look at the atoms and electrons in the rocks:</p>
<p>(2) Microscopically, shockwaves through the rock excite the atoms and molecules in the rock to higher energy levels. When the electrons relax to lower energy levels, they emit photons. Hence the light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/19/another-lunar-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-16240</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/19/another-lunar-impact/#comment-16240</guid>
		<description>Energy?  Lot&#039;s of things use/create energy that don&#039;t produce light.  Surely most of the energy would be bouncing rock around.  I&#039;m only a kid, and (obviously)  no expert but two rocks hitting each other doesn&#039;t create light, does it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Energy?  Lot&#8217;s of things use/create energy that don&#8217;t produce light.  Surely most of the energy would be bouncing rock around.  I&#8217;m only a kid, and (obviously)  no expert but two rocks hitting each other doesn&#8217;t create light, does it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Carnegie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/19/another-lunar-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-16239</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Carnegie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 22:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/19/another-lunar-impact/#comment-16239</guid>
		<description>I think I was told a while back that the Apollo equipment is too small to see with any telescope (the laser reflectors are a &quot;cheat&quot; for this), but there has been considerable development in instruments very recently, plus survey satellites.  Nevertheless, has the entire Moon been sufficiently well photographed ahead of time to find good &quot;before&quot; and &quot;after&quot; pictures?  At least, to say &quot;this wasn&#039;t here before&quot; and then in a hi-rez picture &quot;that must be it, and it looks like God dropped a water bomb in his sandpit&quot;.

I saw it reported as &quot;We have it in mind that one of these things could hit the next moon base&quot;.  Well, the moon base is probably about as safe on any given day as a moon rocket of equivalent size, yes?  Give or take the quantity of loose junk that we have successfully boosted into low earth orbit; a more bad place to be, if you worry about that.  James White wrote a couple of science fiction stories about... well, I think &quot;Deadly Litter&quot; is one.  So anyway... unlikely as it is, I suppose we still want to take precautions so we don&#039;t lose a /whole/ moon base at a stroke.

I think I&#039;d be more worried about radiation.  So a deep underground moon bunker is good for both, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I was told a while back that the Apollo equipment is too small to see with any telescope (the laser reflectors are a &#8220;cheat&#8221; for this), but there has been considerable development in instruments very recently, plus survey satellites.  Nevertheless, has the entire Moon been sufficiently well photographed ahead of time to find good &#8220;before&#8221; and &#8220;after&#8221; pictures?  At least, to say &#8220;this wasn&#8217;t here before&#8221; and then in a hi-rez picture &#8220;that must be it, and it looks like God dropped a water bomb in his sandpit&#8221;.</p>
<p>I saw it reported as &#8220;We have it in mind that one of these things could hit the next moon base&#8221;.  Well, the moon base is probably about as safe on any given day as a moon rocket of equivalent size, yes?  Give or take the quantity of loose junk that we have successfully boosted into low earth orbit; a more bad place to be, if you worry about that.  James White wrote a couple of science fiction stories about&#8230; well, I think &#8220;Deadly Litter&#8221; is one.  So anyway&#8230; unlikely as it is, I suppose we still want to take precautions so we don&#8217;t lose a /whole/ moon base at a stroke.</p>
<p>I think I&#8217;d be more worried about radiation.  So a deep underground moon bunker is good for both, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Babbler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/19/another-lunar-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-16238</link>
		<dc:creator>Babbler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 18:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/19/another-lunar-impact/#comment-16238</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s really great. Too bad you follow through.

What you would name the new crater?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s really great. Too bad you follow through.</p>
<p>What you would name the new crater?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom K</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/19/another-lunar-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-16237</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 18:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/19/another-lunar-impact/#comment-16237</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Tony says:&lt;/b&gt;

&lt;i&gt;...I am assuming, of course, that every crater on the moon has a name, and I could be wrong on that.&lt;/i&gt;

The surface of the moon is nothing &lt;i&gt;but&lt;/i&gt; craters, from the miles-wide impact basins to the tiny pockmarks of interplanetary dust which create the &quot;softened&quot; look of the surface. But if we can pinpoint this one yeah, it oughta get a name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Tony says:</b></p>
<p><i>&#8230;I am assuming, of course, that every crater on the moon has a name, and I could be wrong on that.</i></p>
<p>The surface of the moon is nothing <i>but</i> craters, from the miles-wide impact basins to the tiny pockmarks of interplanetary dust which create the &#8220;softened&#8221; look of the surface. But if we can pinpoint this one yeah, it oughta get a name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/19/another-lunar-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-16236</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/19/another-lunar-impact/#comment-16236</guid>
		<description>If there is a new crater, who gets to name it?  I am assuming, of course, that every crater on the moon has a name, and I could be wrong on that.  Even if some craters don&#039;t have names, this one should be named, since it&#039;s creation has been documented.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If there is a new crater, who gets to name it?  I am assuming, of course, that every crater on the moon has a name, and I could be wrong on that.  Even if some craters don&#8217;t have names, this one should be named, since it&#8217;s creation has been documented.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
