<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Hole Earth Catalog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/27/the-hole-earth-catalog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/27/the-hole-earth-catalog/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:30:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mao Zedong</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/27/the-hole-earth-catalog/comment-page-1/#comment-16575</link>
		<dc:creator>Mao Zedong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jul 2007 07:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/27/the-hole-earth-catalog/#comment-16575</guid>
		<description>&quot;Even if the U.S. atom bombs were so powerful that, when dropped on China, they would make a hole right through the earth, or even blow it up, that would hardly mean anything to the universe as a whole, though it might be a major event for the solar system.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Even if the U.S. atom bombs were so powerful that, when dropped on China, they would make a hole right through the earth, or even blow it up, that would hardly mean anything to the universe as a whole, though it might be a major event for the solar system.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Carnegie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/27/the-hole-earth-catalog/comment-page-1/#comment-16550</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Carnegie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/27/the-hole-earth-catalog/#comment-16550</guid>
		<description>I suppose a movie called &quot;The Botswana Syndrome&quot; might not have had the same box office.

Let&#039;s see... seven-tenths of the surface is water, so if I pick a random point it&#039;s probability 0.3 to be on land, if the distribution of land is random (obviously it isn&#039;t, it comes in clumps) then the opposite point also has an independent probability of 0.3 of being land, so the probability of both ends of any line through the centre of the earth being dry is 0.3 x 0.3, i.e.  9%.  One in eleven.  The line is wet at both ends 49% of the time.  Rough work, good enough for this Web site :-)  (Would any article here be complete without an little regretful appendix about the maths...)

If you drop a mass down a hole right through the earth, don&#039;t other things come into play; air resistance obviously, the planet&#039;s rotation?  But if it&#039;s a vacuum and we aren&#039;t rotating... I&#039;m not sure how we achieve that... and maybe we have to get rid of the moon and tides as well (oh yeah, the sun has to go too)... then you can drop your test mass down the frictionless hole and wait for it to come straight back up, I guess.  But wait, what about adjustment for general relativity...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose a movie called &#8220;The Botswana Syndrome&#8221; might not have had the same box office.</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see&#8230; seven-tenths of the surface is water, so if I pick a random point it&#8217;s probability 0.3 to be on land, if the distribution of land is random (obviously it isn&#8217;t, it comes in clumps) then the opposite point also has an independent probability of 0.3 of being land, so the probability of both ends of any line through the centre of the earth being dry is 0.3 x 0.3, i.e.  9%.  One in eleven.  The line is wet at both ends 49% of the time.  Rough work, good enough for this Web site <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />   (Would any article here be complete without an little regretful appendix about the maths&#8230;)</p>
<p>If you drop a mass down a hole right through the earth, don&#8217;t other things come into play; air resistance obviously, the planet&#8217;s rotation?  But if it&#8217;s a vacuum and we aren&#8217;t rotating&#8230; I&#8217;m not sure how we achieve that&#8230; and maybe we have to get rid of the moon and tides as well (oh yeah, the sun has to go too)&#8230; then you can drop your test mass down the frictionless hole and wait for it to come straight back up, I guess.  But wait, what about adjustment for general relativity&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kara</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/27/the-hole-earth-catalog/comment-page-1/#comment-16551</link>
		<dc:creator>kara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 20:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/27/the-hole-earth-catalog/#comment-16551</guid>
		<description>Be carefulâ€¦ I hear the Earthâ€™s Core is as hot as the Sunâ€™s surface!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Be carefulâ€¦ I hear the Earthâ€™s Core is as hot as the Sunâ€™s surface!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mammal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/27/the-hole-earth-catalog/comment-page-1/#comment-16552</link>
		<dc:creator>Mammal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/27/the-hole-earth-catalog/#comment-16552</guid>
		<description>What struck me about it is that the asteroid impact crater off the Yucatan is very close to opposite the approximate position of India when the flood basalts that made the Deccan traps were laid down.

I wonder if there might be a harmonic or something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What struck me about it is that the asteroid impact crater off the Yucatan is very close to opposite the approximate position of India when the flood basalts that made the Deccan traps were laid down.</p>
<p>I wonder if there might be a harmonic or something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/27/the-hole-earth-catalog/comment-page-1/#comment-16553</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Higgins-- Beam Jockey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 19:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/27/the-hole-earth-catalog/#comment-16553</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;â€¦ but alas, Iâ€™ve already written 3000 words and Iâ€™m only half done.&lt;/i&gt;

Take heart.  From here, you have nowhere to go but up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>â€¦ but alas, Iâ€™ve already written 3000 words and Iâ€™m only half done.</i></p>
<p>Take heart.  From here, you have nowhere to go but up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HAL9000</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/27/the-hole-earth-catalog/comment-page-1/#comment-16554</link>
		<dc:creator>HAL9000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 18:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/27/the-hole-earth-catalog/#comment-16554</guid>
		<description>Heck, I can describe a tunnel through the Earth in 3 words: &quot;AAAAAAA! It BUUUUUUUURNS!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heck, I can describe a tunnel through the Earth in 3 words: &#8220;AAAAAAA! It BUUUUUUUURNS!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/27/the-hole-earth-catalog/comment-page-1/#comment-16555</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/06/27/the-hole-earth-catalog/#comment-16555</guid>
		<description>Tim G. said &quot;Trade winds would make the flight TO London a bit longer.&quot;

As an international pilot and planner, I have to make a slight correction to your statement.  Trade winds are insignificant for jet planning except when dealing with cross winds for landing.  Trade winds are generally mild (~25-35 kts), blow from east to west and are a low altitude (sfc-10k ft) phenomenon.

On the contrary, jetstream winds are significant. They generally occur at higher altitudes (~18-40k ft), are higher speed (~100-175 kts or more), and run from west to east at mid latitudes.  These winds severely affect jet traffic especially on long westbound flights at flight levels in the mid 30K ft (FL 350).

Unfortunately, great circle routes for aircraft are problematic due to the cost of clearances for overflight of some countries. Sometimes the longer way around is cheaper even at higher costs for fuel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim G. said &#8220;Trade winds would make the flight TO London a bit longer.&#8221;</p>
<p>As an international pilot and planner, I have to make a slight correction to your statement.  Trade winds are insignificant for jet planning except when dealing with cross winds for landing.  Trade winds are generally mild (~25-35 kts), blow from east to west and are a low altitude (sfc-10k ft) phenomenon.</p>
<p>On the contrary, jetstream winds are significant. They generally occur at higher altitudes (~18-40k ft), are higher speed (~100-175 kts or more), and run from west to east at mid latitudes.  These winds severely affect jet traffic especially on long westbound flights at flight levels in the mid 30K ft (FL 350).</p>
<p>Unfortunately, great circle routes for aircraft are problematic due to the cost of clearances for overflight of some countries. Sometimes the longer way around is cheaper even at higher costs for fuel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
