Here’s a neat piece of history: no footage of the Apollo 12 capsule splashing down after their trip to the Moon has been known to exist… until now. A man who served on the U.S.S. Hornet, the recovery ship, found some footage shot when Apollo 12 returned to Earth. He found it in the bottom of a storage box! What other treasures are rotting in peoples’ attics, I wonder?
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.
 | ||
 | Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009. |
 |
DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom
Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.
Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us
July 7th, 2006 at 4:41 pm
My dad still has the proposal from RCA & Grunman on the lunar lander module. He worked on the Apollo project for RCA. Not as exciting as the splashdown footage.
July 7th, 2006 at 5:35 pm
Speaking of lost. I read just a couple of days ago that there’s a hunt ongoing for magnetic tapes which store the original TV signal received from Apollo 11.
It seems that what was seen on television around the world was a processed, inferior signal, and that the original has much more brightness and better contrast. The webpage whereat I found this offered as evidence some Polaroids taken directly from monitor screens at the time of the broadcast. There is a significant difference in image quality.
The rub is- that the only facility known to be able to read the tape format in question is due to be shut down in the near future. That, plus the fact that the tapes, wherever they may be, are also aging and possibly losing data even as we speak.
July 7th, 2006 at 5:55 pm
Amazing what you can find in weird places.
July 7th, 2006 at 6:15 pm
Awesome video! Pretty neat to know that thing exists!!
July 7th, 2006 at 6:45 pm
I have footage my father took of the recovery of
Walter M. Schirra`s Mercury capsule.
It is some shaky super 8 color footage.
My Father was serving on the USS Kearsarge.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_8
July 7th, 2006 at 7:22 pm
That is so very shiny!!! That’s about all I can say now.:)
July 8th, 2006 at 6:04 am
I remember avidly watching all available footage from the moon missions. To me, the most remarkable thing about this footage of Apollo 12 landing is realizing, again, how tiny the space capsules were. Has our PC-topia forgotten that there are real risks involved in any venture that charts unknown territory? The shuttle is like a luxury liner compared to the rowboat “living quarters” of the Mercury and Apollo missions.
July 8th, 2006 at 6:33 am
This article is not exactly correct. The footage is the NASA stock footage from the Apollo 12 landing, which we made a new transfer of at the National Archives about two years ago.
We released the footage over a year and a half ago on our Apollo 12 DVD set, so it wasn’t exactly “lost” or “never before seen.”
Mark Gray
Spacecraft Films
July 8th, 2006 at 1:22 pm
[...] According to Bad Astronomy Blog, “no footage of the Apollo 12 capsule splashing down after their trip to the Moon has been known to exist… until now.” And there’s a link to NBC San Diego which has a movie file you can see. Two weeks ago, a discovery at the bottom of an old box showed, for the first time, the final and exciting moments of the mission. It came inside a 16-millimeter film reel. [...]
July 8th, 2006 at 2:40 pm
Mark Martin, Apollo 11 sent slow-scan TV pictures to save bandwidth (which allowed the use of a smaller antenna and a lower signal power). These could not be transmitted directly over the world’s TV networks, so they displayed the SSTV image on a monitor and pointed a normal TV camera at the monitor. THe picture from this camera was sent out to the TV networks. Hence the reduction in quality.
Having said that, the quality would not have been what we would call “good” in the first place.
As the Apollo programme progressed, and the engineers found out how well their kit worked, they were able to push things a little, so the later missions carried heavier payloads than the earlier ones. One aspect of this was an improvement in the TV images transmitted from the surface of the moon as the programme progressed.
July 8th, 2006 at 5:44 pm
The biggest WoW factor from Apollo 12 was how close the LEM landed near the Surveyor Robot Probe resting on the lunar surface. Was that 600 feet or 600 yards?
July 9th, 2006 at 2:47 am
Ray, oh, yes, indeed!
I have a picture that I use as some-time wallpaper that was taken by one of the Apollo 12 astronauts. It shows Surveyor 3 in the foreground and the Apollo 12 LM (Intrepid) in the background.
You can even see where Surveyor 3 bounced and skidded a little on its landing, from the way the regolith preserved the imprints of its feet.
July 9th, 2006 at 3:04 am
Ray, I had a look through Chaikin’s A Man on the Moon to try to find a reference to the distance between Intrepid and Suveyor 3. The only time he mentions the distance between the two craft, Pete Conrad and Al Bean are 300 feet from Surveyor, and Intrepid looks “like a tiny replica”, so I would guess it was 600 yards, not 600 feet.
July 9th, 2006 at 4:01 am
I remember avidly watching all available footage from the moon missions. To me, the most remarkable thing about this footage of Apollo 12 landing is realizing, again, how tiny the space capsules were. Has our PC-topia forgotten that there are real risks involved in any venture that charts unknown territory..
July 9th, 2006 at 11:13 am
Nigel Depledge says:
“Having said that, the quality would not have been what we would call “good†in the first place.”
Yes, I’m certainly aware of that. Nevertheless, as can be seen on the following page:
http://www.honeysucklecreek.net/Apollo_11/tapes/Search_for_SSTV_Tapes.pdf
the quality of the raw, unprocessed signal was significantly better than what was seen in living rooms.
July 9th, 2006 at 2:25 pm
Agreed, Mark. The quality of the original SSTV pictures was noticeably superior to the broadcast images.
November 30th, 2008 at 2:10 pm
Was onboard for the recovery. Upon splashdown , the capsule took on seawater due to one of the three flotation bubbles bursting.I was the sailor who used a garden water hose to siphon the water out of the capsule after it came onboard Hornet,Siphoned it out just like we used to do gas out of a car. Was a little worried about contamination since the seawater came out of the capsule.However,no negative lifelong effects LOL. Also retrieved a nice piece of the mylar foil from the capsule, with the permission of NASA.Great memories of Apollo 11 and 12
Michael Mullins
Bedford Texas
mullinsmd48@tx.rr.com