<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SERPs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/17/serps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/17/serps/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 06:42:50 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/17/serps/comment-page-1/#comment-17338</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/17/serps/#comment-17338</guid>
		<description>Ah, good ole SW Sex.  My thesis advisor had to pick that one as the namesake for a class of cataclysmic variables.  I then gave him grief when he vetoed my original title of my thesis.  He didn&#039;t like &quot;SW Sextanis Stars, Superhumps, and other things that go bump in the night&quot;.  I told him I wasn&#039;t the one who chose SW Sex instead of DW Ursa Majoris (DW UMa) as the namesake for the class of stars.  And I wasn&#039;t the one who coined the term &quot;superhumps&quot; either (it describes the shape of how the light intensity varies over time for certain cataclysmic variables).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, good ole SW Sex.  My thesis advisor had to pick that one as the namesake for a class of cataclysmic variables.  I then gave him grief when he vetoed my original title of my thesis.  He didn&#8217;t like &#8220;SW Sextanis Stars, Superhumps, and other things that go bump in the night&#8221;.  I told him I wasn&#8217;t the one who chose SW Sex instead of DW Ursa Majoris (DW UMa) as the namesake for the class of stars.  And I wasn&#8217;t the one who coined the term &#8220;superhumps&#8221; either (it describes the shape of how the light intensity varies over time for certain cataclysmic variables).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolving Squid</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/17/serps/comment-page-1/#comment-17337</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolving Squid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:53:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/17/serps/#comment-17337</guid>
		<description>Oh, on the naughty magnetar search, only 2 of the top 10 hits deal with SW Sex (Sextanis).  The rest actually have clinical or research discussions about sex somewhere on the page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, on the naughty magnetar search, only 2 of the top 10 hits deal with SW Sex (Sextanis).  The rest actually have clinical or research discussions about sex somewhere on the page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolving Squid</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/17/serps/comment-page-1/#comment-17339</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolving Squid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 13:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/17/serps/#comment-17339</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Can someone tell me how to find out which Google search keywords bring people to oneâ€™s website?&lt;/i&gt;

The answer to that question depends wholly on how your website is run.  On my web site ( http://darincowan.typepad.com ), and probably any &quot;hosted&quot; web site - particularly hosted blogs -  I can log in to the admin interface and get a &quot;stats&quot; page that shows me &quot;referrer&quot; links.  Those links are often google (or other search engine) search hits, so if I click on them it brings me to the exact search page that visitor used to get to my site.  So for this site, BA can probably log in to a stats page and get the same kind of info.  Hence, if you google this page, you should always use: &lt;i&gt;+&quot;Bad Astronomy&quot; +Plait pineapple&lt;/i&gt;or other weird terms to add humour to his otherwise uninteresting administrative duties :)

If you are running the web site yourself on, say, a Linux box, you&#039;d have to get the referrer information yourself.  You can tease it out of logs, etc. if you set the parameters correctly on the web server.

I have no idea how you&#039;d do it if you run IIS.  I assume that, like most Microsoft products, extracting useful log information involves a dark ceremony involving naked people, woad, lots of candles, a chicken and a black dagger</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Can someone tell me how to find out which Google search keywords bring people to oneâ€™s website?</i></p>
<p>The answer to that question depends wholly on how your website is run.  On my web site ( <a href="http://darincowan.typepad.com" rel="nofollow">http://darincowan.typepad.com</a> ), and probably any &#8220;hosted&#8221; web site &#8211; particularly hosted blogs &#8211;  I can log in to the admin interface and get a &#8220;stats&#8221; page that shows me &#8220;referrer&#8221; links.  Those links are often google (or other search engine) search hits, so if I click on them it brings me to the exact search page that visitor used to get to my site.  So for this site, BA can probably log in to a stats page and get the same kind of info.  Hence, if you google this page, you should always use: <i>+&#8221;Bad Astronomy&#8221; +Plait pineapple</i>or other weird terms to add humour to his otherwise uninteresting administrative duties <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>If you are running the web site yourself on, say, a Linux box, you&#8217;d have to get the referrer information yourself.  You can tease it out of logs, etc. if you set the parameters correctly on the web server.</p>
<p>I have no idea how you&#8217;d do it if you run IIS.  I assume that, like most Microsoft products, extracting useful log information involves a dark ceremony involving naked people, woad, lots of candles, a chicken and a black dagger</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J. D. Mack</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/17/serps/comment-page-1/#comment-17340</link>
		<dc:creator>J. D. Mack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 11:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/17/serps/#comment-17340</guid>
		<description>Can someone tell me how to find out which Google search keywords bring people to one&#039;s website?

J. D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can someone tell me how to find out which Google search keywords bring people to one&#8217;s website?</p>
<p>J. D.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gopher65</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/17/serps/comment-page-1/#comment-17345</link>
		<dc:creator>gopher65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jul 2006 00:29:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/17/serps/#comment-17345</guid>
		<description>hehe Evolving Squid that is a great game for a bored surfer:).

BTW Phil I like this new layout. The old one (well, the old new one:P) felt a bit weird to me, especially the font.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hehe Evolving Squid that is a great game for a bored surfer:).</p>
<p>BTW Phil I like this new layout. The old one (well, the old new one:P) felt a bit weird to me, especially the font.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/17/serps/comment-page-1/#comment-17344</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 23:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/17/serps/#comment-17344</guid>
		<description>Evolving Squid,

I bet some of the hits of the magnatars are due to objects in the constellation Sextantis which is shortened to &quot;Sex&quot; when referring to a variable star.  For instance, +astronomy+cataclysmic variables+sex brings up 18,900 hits.  Of course I knew that there were a few cataclysmic variables in the constellation Sextantis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evolving Squid,</p>
<p>I bet some of the hits of the magnatars are due to objects in the constellation Sextantis which is shortened to &#8220;Sex&#8221; when referring to a variable star.  For instance, +astronomy+cataclysmic variables+sex brings up 18,900 hits.  Of course I knew that there were a few cataclysmic variables in the constellation Sextantis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evolving Squid</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/17/serps/comment-page-1/#comment-17343</link>
		<dc:creator>Evolving Squid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 22:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/17/serps/#comment-17343</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a game I like to play called &quot;Stump Google&quot;.  To play, you must enter a search with the following parameters:

+a_fruit  +a_power_tool +sex

The + is required.

So: +pineapple +chainsaw +sex   (this one remarkably returns 28,200 hits)

The winner is the one with the lowest hits, kind of like golf.  It&#039;s been startlingly hard to get 0, although I&#039;ve managed it once or twice.

More to the topic at hand,

+astronomy +magnetar +sex

returns 715 hits.  Whoda thunk that magnetar research was so naughty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a game I like to play called &#8220;Stump Google&#8221;.  To play, you must enter a search with the following parameters:</p>
<p>+a_fruit  +a_power_tool +sex</p>
<p>The + is required.</p>
<p>So: +pineapple +chainsaw +sex   (this one remarkably returns 28,200 hits)</p>
<p>The winner is the one with the lowest hits, kind of like golf.  It&#8217;s been startlingly hard to get 0, although I&#8217;ve managed it once or twice.</p>
<p>More to the topic at hand,</p>
<p>+astronomy +magnetar +sex</p>
<p>returns 715 hits.  Whoda thunk that magnetar research was so naughty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
