<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rocket science, in the bag</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/21/rocket-science-in-the-bag/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/21/rocket-science-in-the-bag/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 22:36:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: icemith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/21/rocket-science-in-the-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-17618</link>
		<dc:creator>icemith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/21/rocket-science-in-the-bag/#comment-17618</guid>
		<description>Oh, and Irishman, (I guess you will read this sooner or later), I&#039;m still developing that nut/bolt thread idea. Maybe I can be of help to the Falcon Rocket people. Or not.

Ivan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and Irishman, (I guess you will read this sooner or later), I&#8217;m still developing that nut/bolt thread idea. Maybe I can be of help to the Falcon Rocket people. Or not.</p>
<p>Ivan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icemith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/21/rocket-science-in-the-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-17619</link>
		<dc:creator>icemith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:28:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/21/rocket-science-in-the-bag/#comment-17619</guid>
		<description>Did you notice today&#039;s topic by Phil in BA are both about &#039;Nut cases&#039;?

Ivan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you notice today&#8217;s topic by Phil in BA are both about &#8216;Nut cases&#8217;?</p>
<p>Ivan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorne Ipsum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/21/rocket-science-in-the-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-17620</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorne Ipsum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 13:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/21/rocket-science-in-the-bag/#comment-17620</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know what the weight penalty will be, it&#039;s really a function of how many types of aluminum nuts they were using, and how many they&#039;re really replacing.  FWIW, I did a quick web search on &quot;B nut&quot; and found this site:

   http://www.fas.org/spp/military/docops/smc/bnuts18.htm

So if this were an Air Force LV, they wouldn&#039;t be allowed to use B-nuts.  Maybe this lesson was learned before, by someone else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know what the weight penalty will be, it&#8217;s really a function of how many types of aluminum nuts they were using, and how many they&#8217;re really replacing.  FWIW, I did a quick web search on &#8220;B nut&#8221; and found this site:</p>
<p>   <a href="http://www.fas.org/spp/military/docops/smc/bnuts18.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.fas.org/spp/military/docops/smc/bnuts18.htm</a></p>
<p>So if this were an Air Force LV, they wouldn&#8217;t be allowed to use B-nuts.  Maybe this lesson was learned before, by someone else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Siefert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/21/rocket-science-in-the-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-17622</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Siefert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 05:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/21/rocket-science-in-the-bag/#comment-17622</guid>
		<description>Ah, they probably forgot why they chose aluminium first place and when the next rocket blows up they suddenly remember some obscure little detail.

Sorry about the spelling of aluminium, but I think it looks better in Europese :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, they probably forgot why they chose aluminium first place and when the next rocket blows up they suddenly remember some obscure little detail.</p>
<p>Sorry about the spelling of aluminium, but I think it looks better in Europese <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/21/rocket-science-in-the-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-17621</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 04:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/21/rocket-science-in-the-bag/#comment-17621</guid>
		<description>I wonder what the weight penalty will be for switching to steel? It might be quite a bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what the weight penalty will be for switching to steel? It might be quite a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorne Ipsum</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/21/rocket-science-in-the-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-17623</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorne Ipsum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 03:16:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/21/rocket-science-in-the-bag/#comment-17623</guid>
		<description>The aluminum nuts were probably used for mass savings.  Since they were anodized, but corroded anyway, a handling issue was probably involved as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The aluminum nuts were probably used for mass savings.  Since they were anodized, but corroded anyway, a handling issue was probably involved as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gopher65</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/21/rocket-science-in-the-bag/comment-page-1/#comment-17624</link>
		<dc:creator>gopher65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jul 2006 01:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/21/rocket-science-in-the-bag/#comment-17624</guid>
		<description>BB, they claim that the stainless steel nuts are much cheaper than the aluminum ones. And they will be changing over to all stainless steel on their next attempt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BB, they claim that the stainless steel nuts are much cheaper than the aluminum ones. And they will be changing over to all stainless steel on their next attempt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
