DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Jupiter, spot by spot
Lakes on Titan? »

Ruh Row! The new Skeptic’s Circle is up!

How is it that with all the themed Skeptic’s Circles (carnivals of skeptical blog entries) that have been posted, no one ever thought of those meddling kids? Zoink!

Back when my beard wasn’t fully grown in, I was sometimes accused of looking like Shaggy. Hmph.

By the way, "Scooby Do" was one of the best all-time skeptical shows on TV: it always looked like ghost, goblins, and ghouls were behind the capers, but it always turned out to be Bart Sibrel a hoax. How cool was that?

Share

July 24th, 2006 12:23 PM by Phil Plait in About this blog, Antiscience, Astronomy, Cool stuff, Debunking, Humor, Piece of mind, Science, Skepticism | 10 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

10 Responses to “Ruh Row! The new Skeptic’s Circle is up!”

  1. 1.   Austin Says:
    July 24th, 2006 at 12:39 pm

    “Scooby Doo” was a good skeptic show … until the movie came out and that had ACTUAL ghosts instead of some creepy guy scaring kids.

    Like, yoinks.

  2. 2.   Josh Says:
    July 24th, 2006 at 12:51 pm

    Gotta second the above comment. I saw an updated Scooby show a while back, with witches and pirate ghosts that turned out to be…witches and pirate ghosts.

    Shaggy and Scooby’s credulity was rewarded, and Fred and Thelma’s skepticism was punished. I fear for our children.

  3. 3.   Bronze Dog Says:
    July 24th, 2006 at 3:29 pm

    I third the first comment: Skepticism is a virtue that we must instill in our kids. The Scooby Doo crew had to look beyond the first impressions of the credulous.

  4. 4.   Elyk Says:
    July 24th, 2006 at 7:29 pm

    Hollywood does it again…

  5. 5.   HAL9000 Says:
    July 25th, 2006 at 11:45 am

    For pity’s sake, people, there’s such a thing as taking skepticism too far. Some ghost stories are not going to subvert the children and taint our precious bodily fluids. What’s next on the hit list? Harry Potter? I think most kids grok the difference between fantasy from reality.

    And Scooby Doo blew. It’s an archetype of poor toonage right out of the Dark Age of American animation.

  6. 6.   Melusine Says:
    July 25th, 2006 at 8:35 pm

    HAL9000 Says:

    For pity’s sake, people, there’s such a thing as taking skepticism too far. Some ghost stories are not going to subvert the children and taint our precious bodily fluids. What’s next on the hit list? Harry Potter? I think most kids grok the difference between fantasy from reality.

    Sure, but that’s what was good about “Scooby Doo”…that was the show’s shtick. “Nancy Drew” books were like that also–behind every weird happening or mystery was a Mr. So-and-So up to no good. There’s plenty of fantasy to go around, so it doesn’t hurt to have some cartoons deal with plausible reasons for ghostly apparitions.

    And Scooby Doo blew. It’s an archetype of poor toonage right out of the Dark Age of American animation.

    Geesh, we grew up with “Scooby Doo” every Saturday morning, but hey, at least I don’t believe in ghosts, ghouls, and crystal balls. Now, what to do with all these palm reading establishments still thriving all over Houston…maybe kids get it, but not all adults.

  7. 7.   frogmarch Says:
    July 25th, 2006 at 8:51 pm

    I found the scoobydoo explinations were often terrible, like projection of ghosts onto thin air- I don’t see how that futhers the cause of critical thinking.

  8. 8.   Wyle E. Says:
    July 27th, 2006 at 6:27 am

    Come on folks, Scooby Doo was a cartoon! It’s not meant to educate. Relax and escape a little once in a while.

  9. 9.   Mark Martin Says:
    July 27th, 2006 at 2:52 pm

    Incidentally, if anyone here is a Jonny Quest afficionado, they might notice a similarity between the formula plot to Scooby-Doo and an episode of Quest, broadcast several years prior to Scoob & The Gang’s entry into Saturday mornings.

    The episode is “Werewolf of the Timberland”, and the plot synopsis (from http://www.classicjq.com) reads:

    “The Quests go in search of a rare type of petrified wood in an area where they’ve been warned about a prowling werewolf.”

    In the end, it turns out the werewolf is just an elaborate myth, propagated by a small number of greedy opportunists who are privy to some sort of high-valued commodity in the region.

  10. 10.   KaiYeves Says:
    August 24th, 2007 at 3:26 pm

    Sorry if this post is long, but this topic is very close to my heart.
    Back when I was younger, back before I had ever heard of this website, faces in Cydonia, waving flags on the moon, Piltdown Man, Planet X, Occam’s razor, candles in the dark or even the words “astronomy” or “skepticism”, I knew what they were from Scooby-Doo. I watched it all the time and still do. The VERY new movies do have fake monsters again, and most of them are set in foreign countries where real facts are woven in. Scooby-Doo and the Loch Ness Monster even contained two rival scientist characters, one a borderline-woowoo true believer, the other so skeptical he wouldn’t even let people mention the monster. In the end, both recived their due- the monster proof that had been uncovered throughout the film were fakes, but there was tantilizing proof that a real monster might exist. I wonder if the scriptwriters had heard an interview on Charlie Rose where the great Dr. Sagan was asked
    “What do you think about the Loch Ness Monster?”
    “Well, is it possible that an unknown mammal or some kind of dinosaur is living in a Scottish lake? Yes, it’s possible. Does the evidence support it? No, but as good scientists, we don’t say ‘imposible’, we say ‘unproven’.”
    I LOVED that story- could someone PLEASE write another? Not another team-up, but I’d like to see the BA and his friends take on a Scooby-type monster or Mystery Inc. up against Hoaxland or Sibrel. Velma is my hero, and as a mystery writer, I’ve used several SD-inspired plots. One was in a series of time-travel mysteries, where the hero and Charles Darwin investigate a sea serpent, really a fake made by salvors to scare people away so they can loot a treasure ship. The other one was kind of like “Scooby Doo meets Robert Ballard”, where a group of campers on a JASON-like expedition investigate ‘gremlins’ causing computer glitches that turn out to be two disgruntled techies creating a distraction to steal plans for an ROV.

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA?
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Q&BA: Why spend money on NASA? | Bad Astronomy
      • White House asks for brutal planetary NASA budget cuts | Bad Astronomy
      • A dying star with the wind in its hair | Bad Astronomy
      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us