<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spirals out of control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/26/spirals-out-of-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/26/spirals-out-of-control/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:30:08 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: icemith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/26/spirals-out-of-control/comment-page-1/#comment-17884</link>
		<dc:creator>icemith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 14:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/26/spirals-out-of-control/#comment-17884</guid>
		<description>Ok, those shots are great, truly beautiful. I just can&#039;t understand how, or why the ID mob cannot, or do not, want to appreciate them for their beauty, and (lack of) design. (Is there such a thing as &#039;Chaotic design&#039;?)

Back on topic, how do the experts believe that there is another galaxy involved in the NGC908 galaxy? I cannot see any clear evidence that there is interference. Where is the core of the second one? Can it be determined by the relative ages of them, and what if they are about the same age? Visually I feel it would not be possible to use two separated views (a la stereoscopic), as we would need a large baseline to give a reasonable shot, and it would need to be way across our galaxy to achieve that. Or does it?

But, talk about variety, three entirely different galaxies.

Ivan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, those shots are great, truly beautiful. I just can&#8217;t understand how, or why the ID mob cannot, or do not, want to appreciate them for their beauty, and (lack of) design. (Is there such a thing as &#8216;Chaotic design&#8217;?)</p>
<p>Back on topic, how do the experts believe that there is another galaxy involved in the NGC908 galaxy? I cannot see any clear evidence that there is interference. Where is the core of the second one? Can it be determined by the relative ages of them, and what if they are about the same age? Visually I feel it would not be possible to use two separated views (a la stereoscopic), as we would need a large baseline to give a reasonable shot, and it would need to be way across our galaxy to achieve that. Or does it?</p>
<p>But, talk about variety, three entirely different galaxies.</p>
<p>Ivan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grand Lunar</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/26/spirals-out-of-control/comment-page-1/#comment-17880</link>
		<dc:creator>Grand Lunar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2006 00:59:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/26/spirals-out-of-control/#comment-17880</guid>
		<description>I love spirals too. After all, we&#039;re in one, aren&#039;t we? :)

Think you&#039;ll have an entry dedicated to spiral galaxies on the main site so you can go on and on about them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love spirals too. After all, we&#8217;re in one, aren&#8217;t we? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Think you&#8217;ll have an entry dedicated to spiral galaxies on the main site so you can go on and on about them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/26/spirals-out-of-control/comment-page-1/#comment-17881</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 16:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/26/spirals-out-of-control/#comment-17881</guid>
		<description>Alan, a constellation is just an area of the sky, so it&#039;s not really at any distance. It&#039;s like holding up an empty picture frameagainst the sky and saying the Moon is &quot;in it&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan, a constellation is just an area of the sky, so it&#8217;s not really at any distance. It&#8217;s like holding up an empty picture frameagainst the sky and saying the Moon is &#8220;in it&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aiabx</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/26/spirals-out-of-control/comment-page-1/#comment-17882</link>
		<dc:creator>aiabx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 14:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/26/spirals-out-of-control/#comment-17882</guid>
		<description>On Pharyngula, PZ Myers shows a different cephalapod every week. I prefer spiral galaxies.
HAL9000: You prefer elliptical galaxies? Are you some kind of deviated prevert?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On Pharyngula, PZ Myers shows a different cephalapod every week. I prefer spiral galaxies.<br />
HAL9000: You prefer elliptical galaxies? Are you some kind of deviated prevert?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Berlie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/26/spirals-out-of-control/comment-page-1/#comment-17883</link>
		<dc:creator>Berlie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/26/spirals-out-of-control/#comment-17883</guid>
		<description>I find NGC 908 quite tantalizing. There&#039;s a certain beauty in chaos.

It would be interesting to backtrack other galaxies paths to find out which one caused the irregularity in the arm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find NGC 908 quite tantalizing. There&#8217;s a certain beauty in chaos.</p>
<p>It would be interesting to backtrack other galaxies paths to find out which one caused the irregularity in the arm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HAL9000</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/26/spirals-out-of-control/comment-page-1/#comment-17885</link>
		<dc:creator>HAL9000</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 13:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/26/spirals-out-of-control/#comment-17885</guid>
		<description>&quot;Who doesnâ€™t love a spiral galaxy?&quot;

They&#039;re nice, but I&#039;m more of an irregular/elliptical fetishist myself. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Who doesnâ€™t love a spiral galaxy?&#8221;</p>
<p>They&#8217;re nice, but I&#8217;m more of an irregular/elliptical fetishist myself. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tensor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/26/spirals-out-of-control/comment-page-1/#comment-17888</link>
		<dc:creator>Tensor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 12:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/07/26/spirals-out-of-control/#comment-17888</guid>
		<description>All my screensavers are pictures of galaxies.   I&#039;ve just found several more to add.   Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All my screensavers are pictures of galaxies.   I&#8217;ve just found several more to add.   Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
