DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Yes, more Trek stuff
Gramma Ray Burst »

Dog blog

Set your Cute-MeterTM to "aaawwwwww". I have a new family member to introduce:

Welcome to our new pup, whom we brought home today. She is 9 weeks old, part border collie and part lab. She is incredibly cute, frisky, and smells bad. We hope at least one of these will change.

She had to go through the interrogation process with Bad Dog:

Things went well. Since we now have two of these little beasts, on the rare occasion when a dog plays a role in this blog I can no longer call the old one Bad Dog. So I have decided to call them Canis Major and Canis Minor. If you don’t get that, then here you go (as well as here for completeness). I don’t generally talk about pets on the blog (though it’s been known to happen) but just in case I do, you’ll know whom I’m talking about.

Share

August 12th, 2006 2:50 PM by Phil Plait in About this blog, Astronomy, Cool stuff, Time Sink | 29 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

29 Responses to “Dog blog”

  1. 1.   Damon B. Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 3:43 pm

    Canis Major and Canis Minor?!?

    Surely you’re not sirius!

    (Astronomy Puns: Now with Extra Cringing)

  2. 2.   Shawn S. Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 4:21 pm

    Damon, you gotta try out for the Randi prize! You just channeled Seth Shostak! Which is amazing, because he isn’t dead!

    The million is surely yours!

  3. 3.   Carnifex Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 4:57 pm

    I don’t want to sound offensive, but if the new puppy is she, why not call her Bad Bitch??? OK, OK, maybe that’s not a bright idea at all, compared to Canes…

    However, puppy sure look cute :) Good to hear she has good relations with the Bad Dog as well :)

  4. 4.   Mark Martin Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 5:25 pm

    You could’ve named the new one “Puppis”.

  5. 5.   BB Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 5:52 pm

    That picture is clearly a hoax: the shadows are all going in different directions. I don’t believe that you have a new puppy.

  6. 6.   Wolverine Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 6:02 pm

    Awww. :)

  7. 7.   Supernova Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 6:09 pm

    Cute pups, both of them. What do you call the cat? Leo? (I know an astronomer whose cats are named Regulus and Denebola.)

  8. 8.   Max Fagin Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 7:08 pm

    Damon, you deserve to be shot for that pun.

    BA, of course we get Canis major/minor pun. Who do think reads your page?

  9. 9.   eddie Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 7:11 pm

    I’m with you Carniflex, I think “Bad Bitch’ is the way to go.

    But BA would have to make it VERY CLEAR to Mrs. Bad Astronomer that he’s talkin’ about the dog, wouldn’t he?

    LOL!

  10. 10.   Kasey Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 7:16 pm

    SHE IS SO CUTE!! Canis Major and Canis Minor?! That’s cute too, but the joke everyone gets!

    Have you considered this dog to be a spy for that “pseudoscientist”??? Could this DOG be living proof of life on Mars?!? I mean, look at that coat and the little cutness!

  11. 11.   Elyk Says:
    August 12th, 2006 at 7:28 pm

    XD lmfao! I’m with BB on this one. Hoax picture guys, you’ve been tricked again!

  12. 12.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 3:31 am

    Mark, the trouble with Puppis is: it’s the poop deck of the ship. So, I guess you associate the puppy with poop…

    BA, I’d stick to Canis major & minor if I were you. I think that’s perfectly good (unless Canis minor were to grow up bigger than Canis major of course). I have a stuffed lion (not real, I hasten to add) I call Felis (from Felis leo, you know?), so why shouldn’t you name your canines Canis?

    But, BA, you ended a sentence with a preposition (“…whom I’m talking about”). You’d better hope Gillianren doesn’t read this one, or you’ll be in deep trouble…:-)

    For those of you who don’t know, look here:
    http://www.bautforum.com/showthread.php?t=45420

  13. 13.   Apostrophe Avenger Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 6:09 am

    Apostrophe Avenger, here. BA, you dangle as many prepositions as you wish. (Go ahead and split your infinitives, too.) The alleged ‘rule’ against dangling prepositions was invented in the 18th century by early grammarians who had an imperfect understanding of the nature of language in general and English in particular, and the ‘rule’ never really took hold in terms of how the language was used. Prestigious writers had been dangling prepositions before the rule was formulated; they continued to dangle them afterward. As Winston Churchill is supposed to have famously written as a rebuke to an editor who marked one of his dangling prepositions for destruction: “This is the sort of English up with which I will not put.” (The Churchill anecdote is widespread but may be apocryphal. However, it nicely makes the point of how awkwardly we would write if we never dangled our prepositions.) Farewell. I will now return to my hunt for abused apostrophes. An abused apostrophe is something I will not put up with.

  14. 14.   Blake Stacey Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 6:45 am

    Off-topic: “Enslave the humans and steal all their cows. All of them!” Courtesy Sinfest.

  15. 15.   Erin O'Brien Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 6:58 am

    You have just effed up the Balance of the World with too much cute.

    Hence, I have to do this. Sorry.

    Bad words deleted by The Bad Astronomer

    There. Back in balance.

    Yours in letters,

    Erin O’Brien

    From The BA: Sorry Erin, as much as I like you and your writing, this website tries to be marginally (at worst) kid-friendly. I get hits from EDU sites as kids look up astronomy-related info, so I want to keep “bad” words off the site. :-)

  16. 16.   Mark Martin Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 7:09 am

    Nigel Depledge Says:

    “Mark, the trouble with Puppis is: it’s the poop deck of the ship. So, I guess you associate the puppy with poop…”

    As a matter of fact. I do identify dogs (and cats) with poop. I have two German shepherds and five cats, so if there’s one thing I know, it’s poop!

    Anyway, the joke was funnier my way. :)

  17. 17.   Kaptain K Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 8:05 am

    “I know an astronomer whose cats are named Regulus and Denebola.”

    My brother had a cat that was the only full-tailed cat in a litter of Manxes. So, of course, his name was Denebola.

  18. 18.   icemith Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 9:12 am

    I can see the Border Collie part, but I’m darned (sorry for the language, – shame…) if I can see any Lab. Unless you are referring to being produced in one. Test tube style. And who am I to complain, as my latest grand daughter was exactly that, and she is the cutest little girl I know.

    Ivan.

  19. 19.   icemith Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 9:19 am

    Oh, I just remembered, we used to have a budgerigar, and it answered to the name of “Tadpole”. Figure that one out.

    Ivan.

  20. 20.   Troy Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 10:04 am

    I suppose if your dogs are Canis Major and Canis Minor that makes you Orion. In the spirit of Lloyd Bentson vs. Dan Quayle, you’re no Orion! It would be more interesting if you got a Capricornus, I’ve never seen a sea goat before though I suspect it also would smell.

  21. 21.   The Bad Astronomer Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 10:37 am

    I should point out these are not the dogs’ real names. They are pseudonyms to protect their privacy.

  22. 22.   Mark Martin Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 2:33 pm

    They are participants in the CPP: Canine Protection Program.

  23. 23.   Tim G Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 3:32 pm

    If they were my dogs they would be named Turbo and Sparky.

  24. 24.   ThinCritter Says:
    August 13th, 2006 at 6:38 pm

    As the mythology say’s that Canis Major and Minor are Orions dogs. I guess that makes you …, Oh never mind. :-)

  25. 25.   icemith Says:
    August 14th, 2006 at 12:48 am

    How iOrionic!

    Ivan.

  26. 26.   Erin O'Brien Says:
    August 14th, 2006 at 8:36 am

    All right. Okay. I admit it. You kids do not want to try this at home. I did and look what happened to me. I grew up to be a foul-mouthed mild-mannered housewife that goes on and gets put on probation her very first time here at Bad Astronomy.

    (yes, I spent an inordinate amount of time in the principal’s office as a kid)

    I’d like to tell you that I’ve Found Jesus and am pouting in the corner with my tail between my legs (note use of appropriate cliche for “Dog Blog”), but, sadly, that is not the case. I am eating candy bars and, well, finding ways to swear about it. Don’t believe me? Come on over to my place.

    I don’t know anything about Astronomy anyway, except for knowing when to hold out for a shooting star and that magic dust really works.

    I am Erin.

  27. 27.   spacewriter Says:
    August 14th, 2006 at 9:00 am

    Wasn’t there a song that went something like “I am Erin, hear me swear… ”

    oh, wait…

    I’m so confused.

    BA:

    cute doggie. The smell thing can be fixed with a good bath, you better hope!

    Or are you shopping around for Doggie Beano?
    ;)

  28. 28.   John Powell Says:
    August 14th, 2006 at 9:02 am

    I’m not an astronomer, just a science and science fiction junkie. 12 years ago I named my cats Phobos and Deimos.

  29. 29.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    August 19th, 2006 at 7:02 am

    Apostrophe Avenger said:
    “This is the sort of English up with which I will not put.” (The Churchill anecdote is widespread but may be apocryphal. However, it nicely makes the point of how awkwardly we would write if we never dangled our prepositions.) ”

    Unfortunately, it does not serve as a very good illustration. I believe the story to be apocryphal, because Winnie was a very smart cookie. In “up with which I will not put”, the word “up” is not functioning as a preposition, but as a modifying auxiliary to the verb. So, the verb “to put up (with)” has a different meaning from the verb “to put”.

    So, the form “with which I will not put up” is quite acceptable without any dangling prepositions.

    Dangling prepositions are ugly and they jar on the senses. I find the alternatives significantly more elegant.

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
      • An ear to the ocean
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon
      • A hoopy frood
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
      • Funhouse galaxy | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • A Planet of Viruses: Autographed Book Sale
      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us