DISCOVER Magazine. Science, Technology and The Future
Current Issue
Subscribe Today »
  • Renew
  • Give a Gift
  • Archives
  • Customer Service
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Newsletter
  • Health & Medicine
  • Mind & Brain
  • Technology
  • Space
  • Human Origins
  • Living World
  • Environment
  • Physics & Math
  • Video
  • Photos
  • Podcast
  • RSS
Bad Astronomy
« Planetary scientists support planet definitions
I made a massive mistake »

Colbert takes Neil Tyson down

Did anyone here see "The Colbert Report" last night? He had astronomer Neil Tyson on (well, kinda) — Neil is the Big Cheese at the Rose Center for Earth and Space in New York City. Years ago, when they rebuilt the place (and it’s really cool now, BTW) they constructed a model of the solar system, and Neil got a lot of flak for leaving Pluto out of the model.

Well, with the news from the IAU this week, Colbert forced Neil to apologize for dissing Pluto. It was pretty funny, and BABloggee BigDumbChimp (gotta love that handle) sent me a note that the video is now on YouTube.

I’m pretty sure I could come up with a better "Oh, snap!" line for UB313 though.

Share

August 18th, 2006 11:09 AM by Phil Plait in Astronomy, Cool stuff, Humor, Science | 30 comments | RSS feed | Trackback >

30 Responses to “Colbert takes Neil Tyson down”

  1. 1.   Kevin Says:
    August 18th, 2006 at 11:29 am

    That was hilarious!!

    A few days ago Colbert did the nmemonic, and blew up Pluto. Now he changes his mind.

    I loved the way he cracked up Dr. Tyson. And props to him for being a good sport.

  2. 2.   Jamie Says:
    August 18th, 2006 at 11:34 am

    Great clip!

  3. 3.   tacitus Says:
    August 18th, 2006 at 11:43 am

    I was a bit sceptical of Colbert’s new show when it first started. I used to suspect that his fake bloviating for half-an-hour per night would wear a little thin after a while but, as this clip shows, for the most part he’s been able to pull it off. He’s definitely at his best during the interviews when he shows how quick witted he can be.

    His religion-based objections to all-things sciency are painfully true.

  4. 4.   Paolo Amoroso Says:
    August 18th, 2006 at 12:11 pm

    Breaking news: alternate planet proposal removes Pluto and defeats draft IAU resolution in test vore: http://www.astro.uni-bonn.de/~dfischer/mirror/300.html . Planetary wars continue…

  5. 5.   Dude Says:
    August 18th, 2006 at 12:26 pm

    I got an insult for UB313. You’re so full of methane, they had to escort you to the Kupier belt!

  6. 6.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    August 18th, 2006 at 12:52 pm

    Colbert’s not exactly a gracious winner, is he?

    Besides, his call was wrong – he never mentioned Charon, Ceres or 2005UB313, did he?

  7. 7.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    August 18th, 2006 at 12:55 pm

    D’oh! I meant 2003 UB313.

  8. 8.   ♥♥♥♥♥Fender♥♥♥♥♥ Says:
    August 18th, 2006 at 1:04 pm

    He did good leaving Pluto out of the model, PLUTO SHOULD NOT BE CALLED A PLANET ITS JUST A HUGE ICE BALL. >.0 Neither does Charon! It’s just a big snowball!! I’ve made snowballs bigger then that thing! PLUTO CAN’T BE A PLANET.

    I enjoyed the video, it was interestingly sweet.

  9. 9.   Tim G Says:
    August 18th, 2006 at 1:49 pm

    As spokesperson for Ceres I must say my client takes great exception to Mr. Colbert’s remarks. The “World Ceres” is a fascinating place to visit, untarnished by humanity.

  10. 10.   Grand Lunar Says:
    August 18th, 2006 at 2:06 pm

    Funniest astronomical clip I’ve seen! Well, amgonst the funniest, as I have to consider MST3K and Red Dwarf.

    “Ceres, you’re just a pain in the asteroid!”

  11. 11.   Max Fagin Says:
    August 18th, 2006 at 2:52 pm

    I saw this last night, and if your a frequent Colbert Report watcher, you can see that Mr. Tyson actually did a pretty good job relative to other Colbert interviewes.

    Just wait, his next show will be about how we should name 2003UB313 “Colberton.”

    As I said in my last post, I still think we should petition the IAU to name it “Plaitus.”

  12. 12.   J. D. Says:
    August 18th, 2006 at 6:18 pm

    Darn it all! I want UB313 to be named Rupert in honor of the 10th planet in Douglas Adam’s “Mostly Harmless.” But nobody listens to me : (.

    J. D.

  13. 13.   Evolving Squid Says:
    August 18th, 2006 at 9:02 pm

    I thought Charon was pronounced “Kayr-on”

  14. 14.   Karnalis Says:
    August 18th, 2006 at 9:08 pm

    Not quite as entertaining to me as Colbert’s take on marrying snakes, but still a good one! :)

  15. 15.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    August 19th, 2006 at 12:10 am

    Evolving Squid, go to Bill Arnett’s pages (http://www.nineplanets.org) and look up Charon. He offers two pronunciations, and the reasons behind them.

  16. 16.   Nigel Depledge Says:
    August 19th, 2006 at 12:12 am

    Fender, I would like to see your Charon-sized snowball. Do you have a photo you can post?

  17. 17.   Leo Marvin Says:
    August 19th, 2006 at 3:09 am

    You astronomers are hopeless. A little political capital falls in your lap about once a millennium, and you don’t even know it’s happened.

    OK, here’s what you do. You go to the Discovery Institute, and you tell them that if they back off Intelligent Design, you’ll have Earth declared the only legitimate planet. This, by the way, will be a cinch. For the new definition of “planet” you just propose, “all spherical objects that have NASCAR.” Do it right after lunch when the Europeans will be too drunk to question the acronym.

    You’re asking, “What makes you think I care about Intelligent Design?” I don’t. Before approaching the creationists, you make your deal with the biologists: You’ll get the Intelligent Design wackos off their back if they keep you flush with hookers, beer, pizza, M&M’s, plasma TV’s and DVDs. I’d start with about a hundred hours of Petticoat Junction, Judge Judy and Tucker Carlson, but that’s my taste. You’ll probably prefer something geeky like Dr. Who.

    Don’t thank me. Just keep us all posted on the killer asteroids.

  18. 18.   beajerry Says:
    August 19th, 2006 at 3:27 am

    Colbert rocks!

  19. 19.   Troy Says:
    August 19th, 2006 at 12:17 pm

    Actully Neil Degrasse Tyson was correct to remove Pluto based on the previous demotion of Ceres. If Ceres had always been considered planet worthy with the new objective standard used all along I suspect Dr. Tyson would have never demoted Pluto. Another issue is that the final vote won’t occur until next week, and it seems Pluto and its ilk will be called Plutons or Plutinos, this itself distinguishes them from being classical planets, once again Dr. Tyson is correct.

  20. 20.   maynard Says:
    August 20th, 2006 at 6:21 am

    You got it sooo wrong. Tyson didnt say he was wrong, in fact he was right. He was just saying they grouped Pluto in with their other similar objects in the kuiper belt. But yes, it was a hilarious interview!

    Now, not only does the IAU’s new definition add a few more planets instantly, it will add hundreds, maybe a thousand planets when the tally’s done. He goes into this in some great detail and is also pretty hard-hitting on ID and other things on this weeks Point of Inquiry. http://pointofinquiry.org

  21. 21.   sirjonsnow Says:
    August 21st, 2006 at 10:21 am

    I’m still waiting for them to give Pluto back its real name: Yuggoth

  22. 22.   txjak Says:
    August 24th, 2006 at 8:27 am

    I wonder if Colbert is ready to eat crow?

    We need a rematch!

  23. 23.   Harold Says:
    August 25th, 2006 at 4:28 am

    I’m still waiting for Colbert to declare the members of the IAU “dead to me” for demoting Pluto.

  24. 24.   hopmeister Says:
    August 28th, 2006 at 6:30 am

    I am eagerly awaiting the reaction of the astrological community!

  25. 25.   bookman john Says:
    August 28th, 2006 at 7:59 am

    One of the funnier threads I have ever read. Let me see now – plutononian thread; underground humor?

  26. 26.   Elias Friedman Says:
    August 28th, 2006 at 9:10 am

    Kool!

    Today’s APOD linked to this post!

  27. 27.   Radcliffe S. Mason, Jr. Says:
    August 28th, 2006 at 4:27 pm

    Congradulations Dr. Tyson,
    You where right after all; ” extremely small ….lopsided orbit…..Kupier belt object (ice ball)…etc..!

    Keep on, keeping on….You are the right person in the right position making the right ultimate decision (scientific rather than good old 70 year memories).

  28. 28.   Tom Joyce Says:
    August 29th, 2006 at 9:01 pm

    International Astronomical Union is the new pneumonic:

    My very enormous monster just stopped using nine

    Tom Joyce
    http://www.8pla.net

  29. 29.   michael c Says:
    December 31st, 2007 at 4:36 pm

    What are all of you aliens talking about??? what parts of your minds have been removed…what is a Pluto? do you even know… Mr. Neil was correct

  30. 30.   Open Source mobile edition Says:
    February 10th, 2009 at 9:04 am

    [...] gone unfilled. (What black hole has Sanjay Gupta gone into? Has Neil deGrasse Tyson demoted him too?) But the question remains important. Where you stand reveals where you sit. It’s one thing to have [...]

Leave a Reply





    • About Bad Astronomy


      Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He's written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic and fights the abuse of science, but his true love is praising the wonders of real science.


      The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking, movie reviews, and all that) can be found here.


      Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com


       
      Keep Libel Laws out of Science
       
       Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009.


    • Science Getaways


      Science Getaways: Vacation with your brain!


    • Subscribe to BA


      Subscribe to Bad Astronomy using RSS! RSS feed button


    • Death from the Skies!


      Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, or Barnes and Noble.

      "If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
      -- Adam Savage, Mythbusters


      "Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
      -- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising


    • Recent Posts

      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe
      • An ear to the ocean
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon
      • A hoopy frood
    • Social/Networking/Cool Stuff


      Google+


       Twitter




       Facebook


    • Post Categories

    • Archives

    • Blogroll

      • Bad Astronomy (old site)
      • Bad Astronomy and Universe Today Forum
      • BAFacts Archive
      • Commenting Policy
      • Computer Support
      • Contact Information
      • DM: 80 Beats
      • DM: Cosmic Variance
      • DM: Discoblog
      • DM: Gene Expression
      • DM: NERS
      • DM: Science Not Fiction
      • DM: The Intersection
      • DM: The Loom
      • James Randi Educational Foundation
      • My use of the word "denier"
      • Planetary Society Blog
      • Politics and Religion posts
      • Press Kit
      • Q&BA Archive
      • The Antivax Bible
      • Universe Today
    • RSS DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space

      • Maiden flight for ESA’s Vega rocket tonight | Bad Astronomy
      • Another interactive way to scale the Universe | Bad Astronomy
      • The staring eye of a crescent moon | Bad Astronomy
      • When the Moon hits your apse in a way-cool time lapse | Bad Astronomy
      • Funhouse galaxy | Bad Astronomy
    • RSS DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom

      • Animal Friendships: My cover story for Time magazine
      • The Future of E-books–podcast of my interview on Wisconsin Public Radio
      • Thursday, February 16: Science and social media panel in New York
      • A Scientific Jonah: My profile of Joy Reidenberg in tomorrow’s New York Times
      • Ebooks on the radio: 6 pm ET tonight


  • Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Copyright © 2012, Kalmbach Publishing Co.

    Privacy - Terms - Reader Services - Subscribe Today - Advertise - About Us