The 42nd edition of the Skeptics Circle is up at ImmunoBlogging. Beware of zombies! Aiieeeee!
Anyway, as usual, the circle is chock full of great skeptical writing (it’s a collection of skeptical blog entries from the past two weeks). But don’t believe me! Find out for yourself.
If you went to BadAstronomy.com and found yourself here, never fear: the BA Blog has moved to its new home at Discover Blogs. The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking and all that) is still online, too.
Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He has written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic, and fights misuses of science as well as praising the wonder of real science.
Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com
|
| Bad Astronomy is a Wikio Top Blog! Clearly, Wikio has excellent taste. | |
 | ||
 | Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009. |
 |
"Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
-- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot Uprising
DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom
September 1st, 2006 at 2:36 pm
You are planning to make a lot of “42″ jokes, right?
right?
September 1st, 2006 at 6:36 pm
Andy Says: “You are planning to make a lot of “42″ jokes, right?”
Nah, that would be too all-encompanssing.
September 2nd, 2006 at 4:55 am
I’m all for too encompassing.
Ivan.
September 2nd, 2006 at 6:36 am
This is all good stuff, but most of these involve beating dead horses that are not found on the roads I most often travel.
Lately, I have more frequently come across echoes of the bizarre (to me) Griffen/Jones theory that government sappers were responsible for 9/11 in a Bush pre-event conspiracy. That there is a post-event administration conspiracy to exploit this event for the justification of the Afghanistan and Iraq invasions seems obvious and still proven by daily events and statements. I am agnostic on the question of the extent of administration foreknowledge (the notion that perhaps they had intelligence that something was up, let it happen as a pretext for policy), since this pattern has been suggested with some evidential support in the the case of the Rooosevelt administration vs. the Japanese prior to Peal Harbor.
Early on, skeptic Michael Shermer briefly attacked this theory, but a thorough debunking of the Griffin/Jones proposition is still missing. It would be worth a book. Its proponents have several already on the market, selling well to wishful thinkers.