<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The next best thing to being there</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:23:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: KU Students for Science &#187; Art and Science</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/comment-page-1/#comment-21078</link>
		<dc:creator>KU Students for Science &#187; Art and Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/#comment-21078</guid>
		<description>[...] Recently, the blogsphere has been murmuring about the artistic side of science. The Bad Astronomer  made several  posts along these very lines, as well as {mollishka&#8217;s title goes here} and me in my blog. I think all of them are worth checking out if you have the time. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Recently, the blogsphere has been murmuring about the artistic side of science. The Bad Astronomer  made several  posts along these very lines, as well as {mollishka&#8217;s title goes here} and me in my blog. I think all of them are worth checking out if you have the time. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrkeller</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/comment-page-1/#comment-21085</link>
		<dc:creator>jrkeller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 02:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/#comment-21085</guid>
		<description>For those of you that are interested in high resolution Apollo photos should check out Kipp Teague&#039;s Apollo Archieve,

http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html

Moon Hoaxer Jack White should check this site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you that are interested in high resolution Apollo photos should check out Kipp Teague&#8217;s Apollo Archieve,</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.apolloarchive.com/apollo_gallery.html</a></p>
<p>Moon Hoaxer Jack White should check this site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gopher65</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/comment-page-1/#comment-21087</link>
		<dc:creator>gopher65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 01:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/#comment-21087</guid>
		<description>Wow Mike, thanks for taking the time to explain that too us:).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow Mike, thanks for taking the time to explain that too us:).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/comment-page-1/#comment-21088</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:52:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/#comment-21088</guid>
		<description>Hi Phil

Don&#039;t apologise for all the recent blogs on great images - keep them coming. It is always fun and stimulating to come across new perspectives and stunning images.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Phil</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t apologise for all the recent blogs on great images &#8211; keep them coming. It is always fun and stimulating to come across new perspectives and stunning images.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Constantine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/comment-page-1/#comment-21089</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Constantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/#comment-21089</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom

Thanks for pointing out the red dot! I was worried that it was a mistake I made in the panoramic assembly process. But I just checked the original pan frames, and the dot is on those too. Along with several other dots too.

The dots change position from frame to frame, so my guess is that they are just random photographic anomolies in either the development process, or in the duplication of the original transparencies. Or perhaps in the scanning to digital

Thanks
Mike Constantine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing out the red dot! I was worried that it was a mistake I made in the panoramic assembly process. But I just checked the original pan frames, and the dot is on those too. Along with several other dots too.</p>
<p>The dots change position from frame to frame, so my guess is that they are just random photographic anomolies in either the development process, or in the duplication of the original transparencies. Or perhaps in the scanning to digital</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Mike Constantine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Constantine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/comment-page-1/#comment-21090</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Constantine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 23:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/#comment-21090</guid>
		<description>Hi Tom, thanks for pointing out the red dot. I thought it may have been something I had mistakingly done during the Panoramic assembly process, but I just checked the original pan frame images, and the dot is on those too, and quite a few other dots too.

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/as11-40-5930HR.jpg

http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/as11-40-5931HR.jpg

As the dots are in different positions as the pan goes along my guess is they are just photographic anomolies, either in the development process, or duplication of the original transparencies or in the scanning of the transparencies to digital.

Thanks
Mike Constantine
http://moonpans.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tom, thanks for pointing out the red dot. I thought it may have been something I had mistakingly done during the Panoramic assembly process, but I just checked the original pan frame images, and the dot is on those too, and quite a few other dots too.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/as11-40-5930HR.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/as11-40-5930HR.jpg</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/as11-40-5931HR.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/alsj/a11/as11-40-5931HR.jpg</a></p>
<p>As the dots are in different positions as the pan goes along my guess is they are just photographic anomolies, either in the development process, or duplication of the original transparencies or in the scanning of the transparencies to digital.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Mike Constantine<br />
<a href="http://moonpans.com" rel="nofollow">http://moonpans.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/comment-page-1/#comment-21091</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/#comment-21091</guid>
		<description>Mark: Sure. See where the shadow of the lander almost touches the horizon, on the left? It&#039;s above that area, about even horizontally with the middle of the base of the lander.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark: Sure. See where the shadow of the lander almost touches the horizon, on the left? It&#8217;s above that area, about even horizontally with the middle of the base of the lander.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JerWah</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/comment-page-1/#comment-21086</link>
		<dc:creator>JerWah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/#comment-21086</guid>
		<description>Must...Get...Image...of Bad Astronomer...in his skivies...out of my mind....AAAAARGGGGHHHHH........AAAARGGGHHHHH

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must&#8230;Get&#8230;Image&#8230;of Bad Astronomer&#8230;in his skivies&#8230;out of my mind&#8230;.AAAAARGGGGHHHHH&#8230;&#8230;..AAAARGGGHHHHH<br />
 <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Martin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/comment-page-1/#comment-21079</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 19:51:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/#comment-21079</guid>
		<description>Tom, could you be more specific as to where you see the red dot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, could you be more specific as to where you see the red dot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mocky_puppet</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/comment-page-1/#comment-21080</link>
		<dc:creator>mocky_puppet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 18:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/#comment-21080</guid>
		<description>there&#039;s a &quot;C&quot; on one of the rocks there--fake.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there&#8217;s a &#8220;C&#8221; on one of the rocks there&#8211;fake.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/comment-page-1/#comment-21082</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/#comment-21082</guid>
		<description>Shawn: A trillion dollars isn&#039;t necessary to start the job of asteroid reclamation. Just need some imagination, some teleoperated &#039;bots and about 50 billion dollars dedicated to the development of space resources. As Gerard K. O&#039;Nielle pointed out 30 plus years ago, one of the very best reasons for settling the High Frontier was 24/7 access to solar energy. The development of High Orbit Mini Earths constructed from asteroidal materials was a secondary adjunct to the Power Sats and the power sats were ideal as a means of generating cold, hard cash to facilitate the development of the H.O.M.E.s. The economic potential of our near space environment is so large as to boggle an accountants mind. Even G. Bush would have a hard time spending the tax money that could be generated from this exploitation.

Gary 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shawn: A trillion dollars isn&#8217;t necessary to start the job of asteroid reclamation. Just need some imagination, some teleoperated &#8216;bots and about 50 billion dollars dedicated to the development of space resources. As Gerard K. O&#8217;Nielle pointed out 30 plus years ago, one of the very best reasons for settling the High Frontier was 24/7 access to solar energy. The development of High Orbit Mini Earths constructed from asteroidal materials was a secondary adjunct to the Power Sats and the power sats were ideal as a means of generating cold, hard cash to facilitate the development of the H.O.M.E.s. The economic potential of our near space environment is so large as to boggle an accountants mind. Even G. Bush would have a hard time spending the tax money that could be generated from this exploitation.</p>
<p>Gary 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/comment-page-1/#comment-21081</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 13:44:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/#comment-21081</guid>
		<description>Look at the Apollo 11 EASEP QTVR panorama. Notice the small, red dot in the sky just left of the lunar module? I mailed Phil about it, but if anyone has any speculation, I&#039;d be glad to hear it.  I thought it might be the command module in orbit, then I thought Mars because of the red tint. Now that I think about it again, wouldn&#039;t Mars be too faint to see? If all the stars are invisible thanks to the exposure setting, would Mars still show up?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look at the Apollo 11 EASEP QTVR panorama. Notice the small, red dot in the sky just left of the lunar module? I mailed Phil about it, but if anyone has any speculation, I&#8217;d be glad to hear it.  I thought it might be the command module in orbit, then I thought Mars because of the red tint. Now that I think about it again, wouldn&#8217;t Mars be too faint to see? If all the stars are invisible thanks to the exposure setting, would Mars still show up?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn S.</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/comment-page-1/#comment-21083</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/#comment-21083</guid>
		<description>That was like SOOOO 1969, dude... those suits are like SOOOO RETRO, though. Ohmigawd.

Maybe that&#039;s why.

I&#039;m still in awe of the accomplishment when I think about it. It boosts my humanist notions, too. See what we can do when we put effort into something? Of course it also shows what competition can lead to. The Space Race was probably the only reason we were able to do this at all.

Next stop... uh... earth? Personally I like Ben Bova&#039;s scenario of hitting the asteroid fields for resources. If I had a trillion dollars I&#039;d start up a company that was designed to make that happen. The private sector is probably our best bet for space expansion in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was like SOOOO 1969, dude&#8230; those suits are like SOOOO RETRO, though. Ohmigawd.</p>
<p>Maybe that&#8217;s why.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m still in awe of the accomplishment when I think about it. It boosts my humanist notions, too. See what we can do when we put effort into something? Of course it also shows what competition can lead to. The Space Race was probably the only reason we were able to do this at all.</p>
<p>Next stop&#8230; uh&#8230; earth? Personally I like Ben Bova&#8217;s scenario of hitting the asteroid fields for resources. If I had a trillion dollars I&#8217;d start up a company that was designed to make that happen. The private sector is probably our best bet for space expansion in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Siefert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/comment-page-1/#comment-21084</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Siefert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/25/the-next-best-thing-to-being-there/#comment-21084</guid>
		<description>If we could send a man to the moon, why can&#039;t we make people realise how fantastic an achievement it was?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we could send a man to the moon, why can&#8217;t we make people realise how fantastic an achievement it was?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 18:53:13 -->
