<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Radar love</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/26/radar-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/26/radar-love/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 06:15:28 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2020 Hindsight &#187; The Greatest Mission</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/26/radar-love/comment-page-1/#comment-21093</link>
		<dc:creator>2020 Hindsight &#187; The Greatest Mission</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:02:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/26/radar-love/#comment-21093</guid>
		<description>[...] David Seal is guest-blogging at the Planetary Society Blog, and a coupla days ago he blogged about a mission close to my heart in the post entitled The Greatest Mission You&#8217;ve Never Heard About. [via Bad Astronomy] Except that readers of this blog have heard about it. A few times: The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (or SRTM). Or, how we mapped the world in 11 days from the space shuttle. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] David Seal is guest-blogging at the Planetary Society Blog, and a coupla days ago he blogged about a mission close to my heart in the post entitled The Greatest Mission You&#8217;ve Never Heard About. [via Bad Astronomy] Except that readers of this blog have heard about it. A few times: The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (or SRTM). Or, how we mapped the world in 11 days from the space shuttle. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clive van der Spuy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/26/radar-love/comment-page-1/#comment-21092</link>
		<dc:creator>Clive van der Spuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 11:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/26/radar-love/#comment-21092</guid>
		<description>Can anyone provide the scale?  A very similar image is visually descernable at the Vredefort impact site (circa 2023 billion years).  It is visable on google earth - look approx 50 to 70 kilometers South South-West of Johannesburg adjacent to Parys.  The concentric rock formations in that case turned out not to be the edge of the crater but the remnants of the central dome left by rebound!! The edge of the crater is now visually invisable and had a diameter of hundreds (300 to 500?) kilometers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone provide the scale?  A very similar image is visually descernable at the Vredefort impact site (circa 2023 billion years).  It is visable on google earth &#8211; look approx 50 to 70 kilometers South South-West of Johannesburg adjacent to Parys.  The concentric rock formations in that case turned out not to be the edge of the crater but the remnants of the central dome left by rebound!! The edge of the crater is now visually invisable and had a diameter of hundreds (300 to 500?) kilometers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/26/radar-love/comment-page-1/#comment-21095</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/26/radar-love/#comment-21095</guid>
		<description>Map out the cenotes in the peninsula too. They follow an arc right along the arc shown in Phil&#039;s posted image.

A good example here: http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/SIC/impact_cratering/Chicxulub/gpcenotes.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Map out the cenotes in the peninsula too. They follow an arc right along the arc shown in Phil&#8217;s posted image.</p>
<p>A good example here: <a href="http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/SIC/impact_cratering/Chicxulub/gpcenotes.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/SIC/impact_cratering/Chicxulub/gpcenotes.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John B. Sandlin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/26/radar-love/comment-page-1/#comment-21096</link>
		<dc:creator>John B. Sandlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/26/radar-love/#comment-21096</guid>
		<description>Judging from the image, the imact happened a bit out into the Gulf.  Google Earth shows a small group of islands right about the point I&#039;m guesstimating for the impact.  Coincidence?  Maybe.  At the scale of the pictures compared to Google Earth, the islands would be just out of frame.

jbs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judging from the image, the imact happened a bit out into the Gulf.  Google Earth shows a small group of islands right about the point I&#8217;m guesstimating for the impact.  Coincidence?  Maybe.  At the scale of the pictures compared to Google Earth, the islands would be just out of frame.</p>
<p>jbs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irishman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/26/radar-love/comment-page-1/#comment-21094</link>
		<dc:creator>Irishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/09/26/radar-love/#comment-21094</guid>
		<description>I played a small role on SRTM.  I got to fly out to ACE-Abel and view the mast canister and witness a full extension and retraction.  I also visited JPL and saw the rest of the payload being processed.  That was an incredible design criteria.  Think about this - they had to accommodate the flexibility of the boom and the vaccillation at the end of that 60 m boom to allow for that fluctuation in the calculations.  And then they performed a particular thrust maneuver from the Shuttle to snap the fluctuations out.

Yes, that mission was a spectacular engineering and science achievement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I played a small role on SRTM.  I got to fly out to ACE-Abel and view the mast canister and witness a full extension and retraction.  I also visited JPL and saw the rest of the payload being processed.  That was an incredible design criteria.  Think about this &#8211; they had to accommodate the flexibility of the boom and the vaccillation at the end of that 60 m boom to allow for that fluctuation in the calculations.  And then they performed a particular thrust maneuver from the Shuttle to snap the fluctuations out.</p>
<p>Yes, that mission was a spectacular engineering and science achievement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
