Another Skeptics Circle is out!
How could you ever doubt it?
About Bad Astronomy
If you went to BadAstronomy.com and found yourself here, never fear: the BA Blog has moved to its new home at Discover Blogs. The original BA site (with the Moon Hoax debunking and all that) is still online, too.
Phil Plait, the creator of Bad Astronomy, is an astronomer, lecturer, and author. After ten years working on Hubble Space Telescope and six more working on astronomy education, he struck out on his own as a writer. He has written two books, dozens of magazine articles, and 12 bazillion blog articles. He is a skeptic, and fights misuses of science as well as praising the wonder of real science.
Contact me: The Bad Astronomer "at" gmail "dot" com
Bad Astronomy is a Wikio Top Blog! Clearly, Wikio has excellent taste. 
Bad Astronomy was chosen as one of Time.com's Best Blogs of 2009. Subscribe to BA using an RSS Feed
Death from the Skies!
Order a copy of Death from the Skies! from Amazon, Barnes and Noble, or Borders.
"If things worked the way I wanted them to, any reporter about to do another 'sensational' story on deadly meteors would consult this volume, and bang! common sense would find its way into the news. How strange would that world be?"
-- Adam Savage, Mythbusters"Reading this book is like getting punched in the face by Carl Sagan. Frightening, but oddly exhilarating."
-- Daniel H. Wilson, author of How to Survive a Robot UprisingSocial/Networking/Cool Stuff
DISCOVERmagazine.com: Latest Articles on Space- DISCOVER Blogs: The Loom
September 28th, 2006 at 3:03 am
i hate to see posts with no replies, so heres one
September 28th, 2006 at 10:19 am
I’m still following all the links that have more links that have more links…..
Actually, though, I found the categories of denial very useful. Repeating knowledge that isn’t believed doesn’t result in change. It’s like typing in the same computer command over and over expecting the result to differ. When knowledge alone isn’t sufficient, you have to analyze why it isn’t effective just as you would solve other problems in science.
September 28th, 2006 at 2:08 pm
I think that a lot of the intellectual weakness found in crackpot theories may result from insufficient diversity in the lunatic fringe. To address this point, I have recently blogged on the under-reported issue of female under-representation in the pseudosciences. The post is here:
http://lablemminglounge.blogspot.com/2006/09/women-in-pseudoscience.html