<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comment denominator</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:14:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: skeptigirl</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21876</link>
		<dc:creator>skeptigirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 19:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21876</guid>
		<description>I posted on this blog (different topic) and it didn&#039;t show up on the forum. And I have a different name here but the same e-mail. Guess I&#039;ll wait for the system to run the bugs out before worrying about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted on this blog (different topic) and it didn&#8217;t show up on the forum. And I have a different name here but the same e-mail. Guess I&#8217;ll wait for the system to run the bugs out before worrying about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irishman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21875</link>
		<dc:creator>Irishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 20:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21875</guid>
		<description>Sticks, it shouldn&#039;t cause any issues. I don&#039;t know how he&#039;s converting old comments over.  From as soon as he sorts out the bugs, the new comments on the blog will be on the board, and use your board username.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sticks, it shouldn&#8217;t cause any issues. I don&#8217;t know how he&#8217;s converting old comments over.  From as soon as he sorts out the bugs, the new comments on the blog will be on the board, and use your board username.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sticks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21858</link>
		<dc:creator>Sticks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 07:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21858</guid>
		<description>But I use a different e-mail address for the Blog as I do for the BAUT forum, will that cause any issues?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But I use a different e-mail address for the Blog as I do for the BAUT forum, will that cause any issues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aerik</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21859</link>
		<dc:creator>Aerik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 23:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21859</guid>
		<description>I have to add something.  &quot;You can customize the interface however you want it&quot; on Mozilla products as well, in fact, to a greater extent than Opera.  Via CSS and Javascript (Stylish, GreaseMonkey, Usercontent.css, Userchrome.css, User.js, themes) you can change everything about how the browser looks &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; functions.

Heck, allow me to let you in on some secrets.  Thanks to some GreaseMonkey userscripts, the partnership of CoComment.com and Haloscan.com, the CoComment extension, firefox&#039;s form/password/name storing, Every comment page is as good as a forum, and every forum is even richer than before, and so is blogging.  Firefox even makes the internet work better.

Top that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to add something.  &#8220;You can customize the interface however you want it&#8221; on Mozilla products as well, in fact, to a greater extent than Opera.  Via CSS and Javascript (Stylish, GreaseMonkey, Usercontent.css, Userchrome.css, User.js, themes) you can change everything about how the browser looks <em>and</em> functions.</p>
<p>Heck, allow me to let you in on some secrets.  Thanks to some GreaseMonkey userscripts, the partnership of CoComment.com and Haloscan.com, the CoComment extension, firefox&#8217;s form/password/name storing, Every comment page is as good as a forum, and every forum is even richer than before, and so is blogging.  Firefox even makes the internet work better.</p>
<p>Top that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21860</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 22:17:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21860</guid>
		<description>BAUT registration is what you want, so if you&#039;re already registered there, you&#039;re golden.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BAUT registration is what you want, so if you&#8217;re already registered there, you&#8217;re golden.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aerik</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21861</link>
		<dc:creator>Aerik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 22:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21861</guid>
		<description>There are several extensions that allow you to recover tabs and sessoins upon crash, BB, if only you just look for them. &lt;a href=&quot;addons.mozilla.org/search.php?app=firefox&amp;appfilter=firefox&amp;sort=newest&amp;q=crash&amp;perpage=50&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Such as this search&lt;/a&gt; for which I&#039;ve altered the URI so that you get 50 results per page.  As for why this may be an important issue, that kind of crash-recovery was seen by the Mozilla developers as a potential risk for privacy violation.  Mozilla prides itself on the fact that Firefox can serve as a kiosk browser, which is made obvious by the fact that they have a branch of extensions under that specific heading (kiosk).

As for the search features, Mozilla Suite/Firefox/Thunderbird/Seamonkey are all fully capable of this behavior and more.  In fact if you look in sites such as tech-recipes.com, lifehack.org and lifehacker.com, you can find instructions how to easily build your own search plugins!

And finally, compared to the heap of unneccessary and non-standards-compliant code involved in IE, the difference in disk sizes between open-source and standards-compliant browsers is not a significant issue unless you have a really crappy/small harddrive and little RAM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are several extensions that allow you to recover tabs and sessoins upon crash, BB, if only you just look for them. <a href="addons.mozilla.org/search.php?app=firefox&amp;appfilter=firefox&amp;sort=newest&amp;q=crash&amp;perpage=50" rel="nofollow">Such as this search</a> for which I&#8217;ve altered the URI so that you get 50 results per page.  As for why this may be an important issue, that kind of crash-recovery was seen by the Mozilla developers as a potential risk for privacy violation.  Mozilla prides itself on the fact that Firefox can serve as a kiosk browser, which is made obvious by the fact that they have a branch of extensions under that specific heading (kiosk).</p>
<p>As for the search features, Mozilla Suite/Firefox/Thunderbird/Seamonkey are all fully capable of this behavior and more.  In fact if you look in sites such as tech-recipes.com, lifehack.org and lifehacker.com, you can find instructions how to easily build your own search plugins!</p>
<p>And finally, compared to the heap of unneccessary and non-standards-compliant code involved in IE, the difference in disk sizes between open-source and standards-compliant browsers is not a significant issue unless you have a really crappy/small harddrive and little RAM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21862</link>
		<dc:creator>BB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 20:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21862</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t care about how fast it loads pages, opera is just so much more convenient. You can customize the interface however you want it, doing almost anything you want to it, it automatically saves your session as you go so that if say your computer crashes, the next time you open it, all the tabs that were open when it crashed are still there, open to the same page (unlike firefox, which only does that with a special tabbrowser extension, and then only when you close it and specifically tell it to save the session, never when your computer crashes). The panels and widgets are incredibly convenient, and my favourite feature: say I want to search for the bad astronomer in google: just type &quot;g bad astronomy&quot; into the address bar and voila. Many others are programmed into it, and others can be programmed into it (I&#039;ve put w-&gt;wikipedia search, i-&gt;imdb search, d-&gt;dictionary.com search, t-&gt;thesaurus.com search, q-&gt;gamefaqs search and c-&gt;cia world factbook search. So, any time I want to search for something, I just type the appropriate letter and what I&#039;m looking for into the address bar and I get what I&#039;m looking for. So convenient! Not to mention, Opera &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; the smallest, fastest, browser and uses fewer resources than any other one out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t care about how fast it loads pages, opera is just so much more convenient. You can customize the interface however you want it, doing almost anything you want to it, it automatically saves your session as you go so that if say your computer crashes, the next time you open it, all the tabs that were open when it crashed are still there, open to the same page (unlike firefox, which only does that with a special tabbrowser extension, and then only when you close it and specifically tell it to save the session, never when your computer crashes). The panels and widgets are incredibly convenient, and my favourite feature: say I want to search for the bad astronomer in google: just type &#8220;g bad astronomy&#8221; into the address bar and voila. Many others are programmed into it, and others can be programmed into it (I&#8217;ve put w-&gt;wikipedia search, i-&gt;imdb search, d-&gt;dictionary.com search, t-&gt;thesaurus.com search, q-&gt;gamefaqs search and c-&gt;cia world factbook search. So, any time I want to search for something, I just type the appropriate letter and what I&#8217;m looking for into the address bar and I get what I&#8217;m looking for. So convenient! Not to mention, Opera <i>is</i> the smallest, fastest, browser and uses fewer resources than any other one out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sticks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21863</link>
		<dc:creator>Sticks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 20:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21863</guid>
		<description>So where do we register, or is our BAUT registration sufficient?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So where do we register, or is our BAUT registration sufficient?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21864</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 19:20:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21864</guid>
		<description>I was hoping to work on the problem this morning, but I couldn&#039;t. It&#039;s top priority for tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was hoping to work on the problem this morning, but I couldn&#8217;t. It&#8217;s top priority for tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21865</link>
		<dc:creator>PK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 19:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21865</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s progress for you, Aerik...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s progress for you, Aerik&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aerik</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21866</link>
		<dc:creator>Aerik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 17:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21866</guid>
		<description>Pretty pathetic that you guys have to argue over how fast pages load in your browsers. Have you forgotten just how miraculous it is that they work at all?  So a page takes a few seconds to load -- back in the old days you&#039;d have to drive around to get the information you&#039;re itching for.  After that mess, the differences in speed between browsers should be seen as insignificant, but alas, it seems you three have no patience whatsoever!  Naturally, our biggest concerns in browsers should be security and extensibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty pathetic that you guys have to argue over how fast pages load in your browsers. Have you forgotten just how miraculous it is that they work at all?  So a page takes a few seconds to load &#8212; back in the old days you&#8217;d have to drive around to get the information you&#8217;re itching for.  After that mess, the differences in speed between browsers should be seen as insignificant, but alas, it seems you three have no patience whatsoever!  Naturally, our biggest concerns in browsers should be security and extensibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deacon Barry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21867</link>
		<dc:creator>Deacon Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 16:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21867</guid>
		<description>Spam&#039;s a bitch. I was getting the &quot;very good site&quot; comments with links to totally unwanted sites. I toggled on the Word Verification and that seems to have stopped it for now. I presume that when a blog starts getting hits in the thousands, the spam returns?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spam&#8217;s a bitch. I was getting the &#8220;very good site&#8221; comments with links to totally unwanted sites. I toggled on the Word Verification and that seems to have stopped it for now. I presume that when a blog starts getting hits in the thousands, the spam returns?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gopher65</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21868</link>
		<dc:creator>gopher65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21868</guid>
		<description>RIP the speed of IE 6. It may have been broken and insecure, but at least it didn&#039;t take 15 seconds to load a page like Firefox and Opera. Now IE 7 (currently on RC1, so I&#039;d imagine it should be released soon) has copied Firefox all the way. Sloooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow. That was the only reason I used IE over firefox:P.

Stupid hackers that make it necessary to sacrfice speed for security:(.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RIP the speed of IE 6. It may have been broken and insecure, but at least it didn&#8217;t take 15 seconds to load a page like Firefox and Opera. Now IE 7 (currently on RC1, so I&#8217;d imagine it should be released soon) has copied Firefox all the way. Sloooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooow. That was the only reason I used IE over firefox:P.</p>
<p>Stupid hackers that make it necessary to sacrfice speed for security:(.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amstrad</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21869</link>
		<dc:creator>amstrad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 13:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21869</guid>
		<description>GDwarf, the results of this site:

http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html

show otherwise.  Especially if you use windoze.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GDwarf, the results of this site:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.howtocreate.co.uk/browserSpeed.html</a></p>
<p>show otherwise.  Especially if you use windoze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Siefert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21870</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Siefert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 12:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21870</guid>
		<description>BB &amp; GDwarf; Careful there, you are straying into religion and politics....

Vive Le Firefox!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BB &amp; GDwarf; Careful there, you are straying into religion and politics&#8230;.</p>
<p>Vive Le Firefox!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GDwarf</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21871</link>
		<dc:creator>GDwarf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 12:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21871</guid>
		<description>Ah yes, Opera, the one that takes longer then Firefox to load any sort of image. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah yes, Opera, the one that takes longer then Firefox to load any sort of image. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BB</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21872</link>
		<dc:creator>BB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 11:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21872</guid>
		<description>Firefox? Good Browser? Pfft! Mozilla wouldn&#039;t know a good browser if you shoved it in their face. Now, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.opera.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Opera&lt;/a&gt;, there&#039;s a good browser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Firefox? Good Browser? Pfft! Mozilla wouldn&#8217;t know a good browser if you shoved it in their face. Now, <a href="http://www.opera.com" rel="nofollow">Opera</a>, there&#8217;s a good browser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Evans</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21873</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 07:39:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21873</guid>
		<description>yay, i&#039;m loquacious!!

on a more serious note, has the bug been fixed yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yay, i&#8217;m loquacious!!</p>
<p>on a more serious note, has the bug been fixed yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/comment-page-1/#comment-21874</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 06:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/08/comment-denominator/#comment-21874</guid>
		<description>Sigh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sigh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 13:17:00 -->
