<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Katie Couric is a bonehead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/18/katie-couric-is-a-bonehead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/18/katie-couric-is-a-bonehead/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:11:06 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shamantern</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/18/katie-couric-is-a-bonehead/comment-page-2/#comment-22330</link>
		<dc:creator>Shamantern</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2007 20:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/18/katie-couric-is-a-bonehead/#comment-22330</guid>
		<description>Give the woman a break, they pay her less than a $million a broadcast and she knows what sells junk food for thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give the woman a break, they pay her less than a $million a broadcast and she knows what sells junk food for thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dave's not here</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/18/katie-couric-is-a-bonehead/comment-page-2/#comment-22329</link>
		<dc:creator>dave's not here</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 04:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/18/katie-couric-is-a-bonehead/#comment-22329</guid>
		<description>Years ago, i spoke with a reporter, who was a guest lecturer at one of my writing courses, about tv news. When I asked him his thoughts about TV newscasters, he replied, &quot;There&#039;s a reason they call them anchors. Their only purpose is to drag journalism down.&quot; I think that&#039;s the perfect summary of Katie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Years ago, i spoke with a reporter, who was a guest lecturer at one of my writing courses, about tv news. When I asked him his thoughts about TV newscasters, he replied, &#8220;There&#8217;s a reason they call them anchors. Their only purpose is to drag journalism down.&#8221; I think that&#8217;s the perfect summary of Katie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Halidai</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/18/katie-couric-is-a-bonehead/comment-page-2/#comment-22328</link>
		<dc:creator>Halidai</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/18/katie-couric-is-a-bonehead/#comment-22328</guid>
		<description>My initial reaction was that a boycott of CBS should be organized and kept in force until they relieve that vacuous cow of her unearned paycheck.

I think what would be more productive though would be to have her every word from now on examined and criticized until CBS decides on its own to demote her to the game show hostess position she merits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My initial reaction was that a boycott of CBS should be organized and kept in force until they relieve that vacuous cow of her unearned paycheck.</p>
<p>I think what would be more productive though would be to have her every word from now on examined and criticized until CBS decides on its own to demote her to the game show hostess position she merits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Astrolink [Global Edition] &#187; Neil Tyson on exploring space &#124; Latest astronomy news in 11 languages</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/18/katie-couric-is-a-bonehead/comment-page-2/#comment-22327</link>
		<dc:creator>Astrolink [Global Edition] &#187; Neil Tyson on exploring space &#124; Latest astronomy news in 11 languages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 02:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/18/katie-couric-is-a-bonehead/#comment-22327</guid>
		<description>[...] Or maybe these people are just really big fans of Katie Couric. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Or maybe these people are just really big fans of Katie Couric. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CelticBear&#8217;s Musings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Cost of Discovery vesus Destruction</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/18/katie-couric-is-a-bonehead/comment-page-2/#comment-22326</link>
		<dc:creator>CelticBear&#8217;s Musings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Cost of Discovery vesus Destruction</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 17:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/18/katie-couric-is-a-bonehead/#comment-22326</guid>
		<description>[...] ask, why even spend $17 billion on space when there&#8217;s starving people on the planet? Well, as Phil Plait the Bad Astronomer explains, NASA isn&#8217;t just about pretty rockets: because of NASA we have satellites that allow us to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ask, why even spend $17 billion on space when there&#8217;s starving people on the planet? Well, as Phil Plait the Bad Astronomer explains, NASA isn&#8217;t just about pretty rockets: because of NASA we have satellites that allow us to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Monty</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/18/katie-couric-is-a-bonehead/comment-page-2/#comment-22325</link>
		<dc:creator>Monty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 03:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/18/katie-couric-is-a-bonehead/#comment-22325</guid>
		<description>Please accept my apologies for chiming in on the Katie Couric commentary at this late moment.  Still, NASA content aside, Couric gets a huge audience every evening and it&#039;s worth my time to say a few words about her presence as anchor on a national U.S. television network which eventually impacts most Americans.

After a few months of periodically viewing Katie Couric at the bridge of CBS News, it&#039;s clear to me that the Peter Principle has manifested itself.  Couric is now &quot;out of her league&quot;.  She clearly lacks confidence in front of evening viewers - my guess is that this is, at least in part, a result of receiving a lot of negative feedback thru the CBS web site and other channels.  Of course, the &quot;rules of engagement&quot; make it clear that it&#039;s CBS&#039;s web site and they quite obviously manage all associated content.  This is entirely fair.  What is unfair, to me, is that we have Katie to view if we choose to tune in to CBS News in the evening, which I elect to do as infrequently as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please accept my apologies for chiming in on the Katie Couric commentary at this late moment.  Still, NASA content aside, Couric gets a huge audience every evening and it&#8217;s worth my time to say a few words about her presence as anchor on a national U.S. television network which eventually impacts most Americans.</p>
<p>After a few months of periodically viewing Katie Couric at the bridge of CBS News, it&#8217;s clear to me that the Peter Principle has manifested itself.  Couric is now &#8220;out of her league&#8221;.  She clearly lacks confidence in front of evening viewers &#8211; my guess is that this is, at least in part, a result of receiving a lot of negative feedback thru the CBS web site and other channels.  Of course, the &#8220;rules of engagement&#8221; make it clear that it&#8217;s CBS&#8217;s web site and they quite obviously manage all associated content.  This is entirely fair.  What is unfair, to me, is that we have Katie to view if we choose to tune in to CBS News in the evening, which I elect to do as infrequently as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eddie</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/18/katie-couric-is-a-bonehead/comment-page-2/#comment-22306</link>
		<dc:creator>eddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Oct 2006 03:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/18/katie-couric-is-a-bonehead/#comment-22306</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a little late to this discussion after taking a week&#039;s vacation during which I swore off the Internet, but I have some thoughts on this.

First, the comments on Couric&#039;s site that referred to her &quot;leftist&quot; leanings are off the mark. She may indeed be of the liberal persuasion, but that&#039;s not the issue here. The issue is that she&#039;s the very definition of a &quot;talking head,&quot; and as one reader commented here, she is paid to read the news from a teleprompter, and that&#039;s where her job should end, as her commentary clearly proves.

Secondly, I&#039;m a member of the print media, and we do make mistakes. Do those errors speak to our credibility? Absolutely. But we&#039;re not all idiots, and unless you&#039;ve felt the pressure of deadline when a story is happening under your very nose, your comments are taken with a grain of salt.

Couric is an artifact of popular culture and really has no place in the world of true journalism. In my opinion, CBS should have ridden Bob Schieffer until he could no longer handle the job because he&#039;s a throwback to the days of journalistic honesty, integrity and, yes, even compassion. He never made such commentary off the cuff; everything he editorialized seemed well-researched and much thought and consideration were obviously undertaken before he dared open his mouth.

I don&#039;t blame Couric for taking the millions and giving it a shot, but I do hold those who hired her accountable, and wonder if we&#039;ll ever return to the principled journalism of the Cronkites and Schieffers of the past, be it delivery of the news or the commentary that follows.

Just my opinion and thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a little late to this discussion after taking a week&#8217;s vacation during which I swore off the Internet, but I have some thoughts on this.</p>
<p>First, the comments on Couric&#8217;s site that referred to her &#8220;leftist&#8221; leanings are off the mark. She may indeed be of the liberal persuasion, but that&#8217;s not the issue here. The issue is that she&#8217;s the very definition of a &#8220;talking head,&#8221; and as one reader commented here, she is paid to read the news from a teleprompter, and that&#8217;s where her job should end, as her commentary clearly proves.</p>
<p>Secondly, I&#8217;m a member of the print media, and we do make mistakes. Do those errors speak to our credibility? Absolutely. But we&#8217;re not all idiots, and unless you&#8217;ve felt the pressure of deadline when a story is happening under your very nose, your comments are taken with a grain of salt.</p>
<p>Couric is an artifact of popular culture and really has no place in the world of true journalism. In my opinion, CBS should have ridden Bob Schieffer until he could no longer handle the job because he&#8217;s a throwback to the days of journalistic honesty, integrity and, yes, even compassion. He never made such commentary off the cuff; everything he editorialized seemed well-researched and much thought and consideration were obviously undertaken before he dared open his mouth.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t blame Couric for taking the millions and giving it a shot, but I do hold those who hired her accountable, and wonder if we&#8217;ll ever return to the principled journalism of the Cronkites and Schieffers of the past, be it delivery of the news or the commentary that follows.</p>
<p>Just my opinion and thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
