<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hubble mission to be announced Tuesday at 10:00 a.m. Eastern</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:23:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cylinder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/comment-page-1/#comment-22894</link>
		<dc:creator>Cylinder</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 08:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/#comment-22894</guid>
		<description>This is already a done deal, IMHO. Griffin&#039;s been very assured about the Hubble mission over the last few pressers. They just had to complete the RTF cycle before they could commit to the mission. I don&#039;t think NASA would be throwing a &quot;we&#039;re not going to fix Hubble&quot; party. That would be bizzare.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is already a done deal, IMHO. Griffin&#8217;s been very assured about the Hubble mission over the last few pressers. They just had to complete the RTF cycle before they could commit to the mission. I don&#8217;t think NASA would be throwing a &#8220;we&#8217;re not going to fix Hubble&#8221; party. That would be bizzare.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mytho</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/comment-page-1/#comment-22895</link>
		<dc:creator>Mytho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2006 00:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/#comment-22895</guid>
		<description>I sincerelly hope that Hubble will give us more and more motives to be amazed at the universe and it&#039;s awesome capability to amaze us even more.

And, after the span life is done with, it is sad, but also very fitting that the hubble would end up it&#039;s life as a shooting star.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sincerelly hope that Hubble will give us more and more motives to be amazed at the universe and it&#8217;s awesome capability to amaze us even more.</p>
<p>And, after the span life is done with, it is sad, but also very fitting that the hubble would end up it&#8217;s life as a shooting star.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/comment-page-1/#comment-22896</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 21:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/#comment-22896</guid>
		<description>Hye, Imust be psychic-- &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/2006/10/why_there_wont.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this was just posted on SpaceRef&lt;/a&gt;, about Hubble not needing a deorbit module for now.

And no, I meant &quot;heavy&quot;, as Wayne pointed out above. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hye, Imust be psychic&#8211; <a href="http://www.nasawatch.com/archives/2006/10/why_there_wont.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">this was just posted on SpaceRef</a>, about Hubble not needing a deorbit module for now.</p>
<p>And no, I meant &#8220;heavy&#8221;, as Wayne pointed out above. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/comment-page-1/#comment-22897</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/#comment-22897</guid>
		<description>Absolute Zero,
I&#039;m pretty sure he was talking about it making a shuttle landing more dangerous with the load, so in that respect (while an atmospheric glider) I think it is appropriate to refer to Hubble&#039;s &quot;weight&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolute Zero,<br />
I&#8217;m pretty sure he was talking about it making a shuttle landing more dangerous with the load, so in that respect (while an atmospheric glider) I think it is appropriate to refer to Hubble&#8217;s &#8220;weight&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Absolute Zero</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/comment-page-1/#comment-22898</link>
		<dc:creator>Absolute Zero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/#comment-22898</guid>
		<description>BA, don&#039;t you mean &quot;since it&#039;s so big and &lt;i&gt;massive&lt;/i&gt;&quot;? Picky picky picky. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BA, don&#8217;t you mean &#8220;since it&#8217;s so big and <i>massive</i>&#8220;? Picky picky picky. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sticks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/comment-page-1/#comment-22899</link>
		<dc:creator>Sticks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 18:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/#comment-22899</guid>
		<description>Expect to be disappointed

sorry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expect to be disappointed</p>
<p>sorry</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Rochon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/comment-page-1/#comment-22901</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Rochon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:24:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/#comment-22901</guid>
		<description>...Wow. They&#039;re very good at keeping the suspense, uh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;Wow. They&#8217;re very good at keeping the suspense, uh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingnor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/comment-page-1/#comment-22900</link>
		<dc:creator>kingnor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/#comment-22900</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll be sad if hubble stops working, i like hubble :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll be sad if hubble stops working, i like hubble <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Bad Astronomer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/comment-page-1/#comment-22902</link>
		<dc:creator>The Bad Astronomer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/#comment-22902</guid>
		<description>If this mission goes off as planned (2008 most likely), and given how long it was since the last one, it&#039;s possible that Hubble will last long enough for another servicing mission. It just won&#039;t be a Shuttle. :-) After all, it&#039;s a huge hunk of machinery, and once it&#039;s over, it needs to be brought down in a controlled manner. Carrying back is very unlikely, since it&#039;s so big and heavy. That&#039;s dangerous. Best to let it burn up over the Pacific, and let its legacy be carried on with other telescopes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this mission goes off as planned (2008 most likely), and given how long it was since the last one, it&#8217;s possible that Hubble will last long enough for another servicing mission. It just won&#8217;t be a Shuttle. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  After all, it&#8217;s a huge hunk of machinery, and once it&#8217;s over, it needs to be brought down in a controlled manner. Carrying back is very unlikely, since it&#8217;s so big and heavy. That&#8217;s dangerous. Best to let it burn up over the Pacific, and let its legacy be carried on with other telescopes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aTom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/comment-page-1/#comment-22903</link>
		<dc:creator>aTom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/#comment-22903</guid>
		<description>I agree with JerWah.  I also worked for the government in a past life and wouldn&#039;t bank on a schedule as proof.  We are dealing with a big bureaucracy.  That said, it is a positive sign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with JerWah.  I also worked for the government in a past life and wouldn&#8217;t bank on a schedule as proof.  We are dealing with a big bureaucracy.  That said, it is a positive sign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JerWah</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/comment-page-1/#comment-22905</link>
		<dc:creator>JerWah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/#comment-22905</guid>
		<description>Only problem with that theory is if the final decision is still being debated, then it would make sense from a scheduling point of view to cover both bases just in case.  I certainly HOPE you are correct, but having worked for the government in a past life, I don&#039;t see this as definitive proof of anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only problem with that theory is if the final decision is still being debated, then it would make sense from a scheduling point of view to cover both bases just in case.  I certainly HOPE you are correct, but having worked for the government in a past life, I don&#8217;t see this as definitive proof of anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/comment-page-1/#comment-22904</link>
		<dc:creator>Carey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/#comment-22904</guid>
		<description>Yay! More desktop backgrounds for years to come!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay! More desktop backgrounds for years to come!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KingNor</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/comment-page-1/#comment-22906</link>
		<dc:creator>KingNor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/#comment-22906</guid>
		<description>Are we to assume that this will be the last service of the Hubble?  Once new gyros are installed, will the satalites life span depend on how long the gyros last and then thats it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are we to assume that this will be the last service of the Hubble?  Once new gyros are installed, will the satalites life span depend on how long the gyros last and then thats it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/comment-page-1/#comment-22893</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 14:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/#comment-22893</guid>
		<description>Speaking of Coast2Coast, I was listening as I went to sleep last night.  One of the callers suggested strapping Hubble to the ISS.  Art Bell pointed out he thought that would not be possible.  So the caller said just put it on the moon.

Regardless, I&#039;m happy NASA seems poised to do the right thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Coast2Coast, I was listening as I went to sleep last night.  One of the callers suggested strapping Hubble to the ISS.  Art Bell pointed out he thought that would not be possible.  So the caller said just put it on the moon.</p>
<p>Regardless, I&#8217;m happy NASA seems poised to do the right thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/comment-page-1/#comment-22908</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/#comment-22908</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a slam dunk that there will be a mission to repair the scope. I&#039;m going to keep my fingers crossed, but it will be hard to use the keyboard while I do that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a slam dunk that there will be a mission to repair the scope. I&#8217;m going to keep my fingers crossed, but it will be hard to use the keyboard while I do that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/comment-page-1/#comment-22907</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/#comment-22907</guid>
		<description>Sounds like a slam dunk that there will be a mission to repair the scope. I&#039;m going to keep my fingers crossed, but it will be hard to use the keyboard while I do that! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like a slam dunk that there will be a mission to repair the scope. I&#8217;m going to keep my fingers crossed, but it will be hard to use the keyboard while I do that! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melusine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/comment-page-1/#comment-22909</link>
		<dc:creator>Melusine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/10/29/hubble-mission-to-be-announced-tuesday-at-1000-am-eastern/#comment-22909</guid>
		<description>I hope you&#039;re right. It will be one mission that will definitely resonate well with the public, and it would have a bit of exciting challenge to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope you&#8217;re right. It will be one mission that will definitely resonate well with the public, and it would have a bit of exciting challenge to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 18:39:03 -->
