<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two supernovae, no waiting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:27:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: scatha</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-436621</link>
		<dc:creator>scatha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Nov 2011 11:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/#comment-436621</guid>
		<description>&quot;Can a neutron star ever become the equivalent of a type Ia supernova ?&quot;

I believe yes, and I believe you would &quot;see&quot; an extremely energetic gamma ray with similar energy to a supernova- just most of it not as visible light. Very different to a supernova type Ia.

&quot;Don’t white dwarfs have to pass through a series of novae before finally going through the type I supernova when it collapses into a neutron star?&quot;

The matter (generally hydrogen) falling bit by bit onto the white dwarf produces nuclear fusions which make it much brighter each time a larger amount of hydrogen falls on it. That&#039;s the series of novae you heard about. 
When the critical mass (1.4 solar masses) is reached, it will collapse but it won&#039;t become a neutron star, but instead, the carbon and oxygen it mostly consists of, will fuse to heavier elements in an extremely fast star-wide total nuclear reaction, thus making it explode again, producing a huge amount of energy very fast- nothing remains except a gas cloud, consisting of a lot of different elements from carbon onwards to iron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Can a neutron star ever become the equivalent of a type Ia supernova ?&#8221;</p>
<p>I believe yes, and I believe you would &#8220;see&#8221; an extremely energetic gamma ray with similar energy to a supernova- just most of it not as visible light. Very different to a supernova type Ia.</p>
<p>&#8220;Don’t white dwarfs have to pass through a series of novae before finally going through the type I supernova when it collapses into a neutron star?&#8221;</p>
<p>The matter (generally hydrogen) falling bit by bit onto the white dwarf produces nuclear fusions which make it much brighter each time a larger amount of hydrogen falls on it. That&#8217;s the series of novae you heard about.<br />
When the critical mass (1.4 solar masses) is reached, it will collapse but it won&#8217;t become a neutron star, but instead, the carbon and oxygen it mostly consists of, will fuse to heavier elements in an extremely fast star-wide total nuclear reaction, thus making it explode again, producing a huge amount of energy very fast- nothing remains except a gas cloud, consisting of a lot of different elements from carbon onwards to iron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devo (again)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-24188</link>
		<dc:creator>Devo (again)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/#comment-24188</guid>
		<description>&quot;Itâ€™s weird for another reason. Up until this year, it is one of the very few galaxies which have been seen to host more than supernova.&quot;

Au contraire, its perfectly normal for glaxies to host more than supernova, they host hugenumbers of stars, dark and bright nebulae of allvarieties, dark matter and black holes among other things. Supernovae are what&#039;s  quite rare! ;-)

Sorry, I couldn&#039;t resist that ... I think you a word out there BA, &#039;two&#039; or &#039;one&#039; perhaps I&#039;m guessing?

Incidentally - can a neutron star ever become the equivalent of a type Ia supernova? If it gathers too much mass the same way a white dwarf does a pulsar or magnetar just collapse into a black hole or can it start nuclear fusion and blow itself apart as well? &amp; if one did, could we tell the SN apart from white dwarf ones?  Anyone know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Itâ€™s weird for another reason. Up until this year, it is one of the very few galaxies which have been seen to host more than supernova.&#8221;</p>
<p>Au contraire, its perfectly normal for glaxies to host more than supernova, they host hugenumbers of stars, dark and bright nebulae of allvarieties, dark matter and black holes among other things. Supernovae are what&#8217;s  quite rare! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Sorry, I couldn&#8217;t resist that &#8230; I think you a word out there BA, &#8216;two&#8217; or &#8216;one&#8217; perhaps I&#8217;m guessing?</p>
<p>Incidentally &#8211; can a neutron star ever become the equivalent of a type Ia supernova? If it gathers too much mass the same way a white dwarf does a pulsar or magnetar just collapse into a black hole or can it start nuclear fusion and blow itself apart as well? &amp; if one did, could we tell the SN apart from white dwarf ones?  Anyone know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devo Raine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-24187</link>
		<dc:creator>Devo Raine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/#comment-24187</guid>
		<description>Loks like an S0 type galaxy  - a borderline elliptical /spiral sometimes also called a lenticular galaxy. Not necessarily the sort of Galaxy you&#039;d expect to star with supernovae. (The sort I&#039;d expect, well for type II anyway, would be starburst galaxies eg. M82) Most type II &amp; type Ib would occur from massive young supergiant stars found in young spiral galaxies in the disk mainly. Most old stars occur as populations in the bulges of spirals and in ellipticals so .. well the cosmos confounds expectations again!

Working on an article about the white dwarf Van Maanen&#039;s Star at present - another neat co-incidence.

Nearby white dwarfs : Sirius B &amp; Procyon B  (F-type star a bit brighter and hotter than our Sun, 11 ly off) which are both orbiting larger main-sequence stars and could perhaps one day become nova or supernovae and then the third nearest and first single white dwarf, Van Maanen&#039;s Star  -which won&#039;t  become a supernova (SN) - at a distance of 14 light years away. Needless to say if Sirius or Procyon B do turn SN it won&#039;t be for millions of years.

In answer to &#039;ThePolynomial&#039; : From my recollection &amp;/or gut-feeling I&#039;d say we&#039;d be in serious mass extinction territory if a supernova goes off closer than about 20-30 ly away. One closer than 50 would likely cause serious problems for us &amp; one at about 100 ly would be getting a little close for comfort. One thats 200 or further away and its more a case of lets enjoy the show! ;-)

As for gravitat&#039;l lensing, Glenn Becker,  I very much doubt it could duplicate a single star or SN and not the entire galaxy.  Not a naive question btw but a good one.

ioresult -yep. Your understanding and mine are identical on this because that&#039;s right! ;-)

SN do occur after novae outbursts - many of them as the mass builds up. Unless the progenitor white dwarf was very close to the mass limit anyhow ...

White dwarfs may vary slightly with age and mass so it makes sense that
they may not all be identical and hence not the best standard candles. Haven&#039;t heard any news about recent doubts on their use as such, &#039;jackd&#039; but it wouldn&#039;t surprise me if they were a LOT less accurate as measuring
sticks than Cepheids etc ..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loks like an S0 type galaxy  &#8211; a borderline elliptical /spiral sometimes also called a lenticular galaxy. Not necessarily the sort of Galaxy you&#8217;d expect to star with supernovae. (The sort I&#8217;d expect, well for type II anyway, would be starburst galaxies eg. M82) Most type II &amp; type Ib would occur from massive young supergiant stars found in young spiral galaxies in the disk mainly. Most old stars occur as populations in the bulges of spirals and in ellipticals so .. well the cosmos confounds expectations again!</p>
<p>Working on an article about the white dwarf Van Maanen&#8217;s Star at present &#8211; another neat co-incidence.</p>
<p>Nearby white dwarfs : Sirius B &amp; Procyon B  (F-type star a bit brighter and hotter than our Sun, 11 ly off) which are both orbiting larger main-sequence stars and could perhaps one day become nova or supernovae and then the third nearest and first single white dwarf, Van Maanen&#8217;s Star  -which won&#8217;t  become a supernova (SN) &#8211; at a distance of 14 light years away. Needless to say if Sirius or Procyon B do turn SN it won&#8217;t be for millions of years.</p>
<p>In answer to &#8216;ThePolynomial&#8217; : From my recollection &amp;/or gut-feeling I&#8217;d say we&#8217;d be in serious mass extinction territory if a supernova goes off closer than about 20-30 ly away. One closer than 50 would likely cause serious problems for us &amp; one at about 100 ly would be getting a little close for comfort. One thats 200 or further away and its more a case of lets enjoy the show! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As for gravitat&#8217;l lensing, Glenn Becker,  I very much doubt it could duplicate a single star or SN and not the entire galaxy.  Not a naive question btw but a good one.</p>
<p>ioresult -yep. Your understanding and mine are identical on this because that&#8217;s right! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>SN do occur after novae outbursts &#8211; many of them as the mass builds up. Unless the progenitor white dwarf was very close to the mass limit anyhow &#8230;</p>
<p>White dwarfs may vary slightly with age and mass so it makes sense that<br />
they may not all be identical and hence not the best standard candles. Haven&#8217;t heard any news about recent doubts on their use as such, &#8216;jackd&#8217; but it wouldn&#8217;t surprise me if they were a LOT less accurate as measuring<br />
sticks than Cepheids etc ..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mungascr</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-24186</link>
		<dc:creator>mungascr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/#comment-24186</guid>
		<description>The nearest (eventual) type I supernova may be the brightest (apparent mag) star inour skies - Sirius. Its got a white dwarf star orbiting an A-type main-sequence star, a star that&#039;s going to turn into a red giant soon-ish , wellastronomicalyspeaking anyhow. Its about 8 light years way - one of thecloests star systems to ours.

I&#039;ve read an SF novel  where Sirius B actually errupts into a supernova  - its got some very good science and a science-versus-religion theme too so I reckon the BA and others here would enjoy it if they haven&#039;t read it already. Its titled plainly enough, &#039;Supernova&#039; by Roger MacBride Allen &amp; Eric Kotani, Avon books, 1991. One slight drawback tho&#039;  - it does feature the now-past millennnium as a minor element being mostly set in 1999-2000-2001 approx.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The nearest (eventual) type I supernova may be the brightest (apparent mag) star inour skies &#8211; Sirius. Its got a white dwarf star orbiting an A-type main-sequence star, a star that&#8217;s going to turn into a red giant soon-ish , wellastronomicalyspeaking anyhow. Its about 8 light years way &#8211; one of thecloests star systems to ours.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve read an SF novel  where Sirius B actually errupts into a supernova  &#8211; its got some very good science and a science-versus-religion theme too so I reckon the BA and others here would enjoy it if they haven&#8217;t read it already. Its titled plainly enough, &#8216;Supernova&#8217; by Roger MacBride Allen &amp; Eric Kotani, Avon books, 1991. One slight drawback tho&#8217;  &#8211; it does feature the now-past millennnium as a minor element being mostly set in 1999-2000-2001 approx.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sticks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-24185</link>
		<dc:creator>Sticks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 08:07:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/#comment-24185</guid>
		<description>And that we are next :eek:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And that we are next <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif' alt=':eek:' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Barrett</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-24184</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Barrett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2006 00:25:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/#comment-24184</guid>
		<description>So there&#039;s no chance that a war between two alien empires is reaching the stage where they&#039;re blowing up each others&#039; stars? :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So there&#8217;s no chance that a war between two alien empires is reaching the stage where they&#8217;re blowing up each others&#8217; stars? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Becker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-24183</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Becker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 21:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/#comment-24183</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no chance this is a &quot;doubled by gravitational lensing&quot; of a single event, is there? That&#039;s a naive question, I guess ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no chance this is a &#8220;doubled by gravitational lensing&#8221; of a single event, is there? That&#8217;s a naive question, I guess &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CelticBear&#8217;s Musings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Interesting Science Blog Day: Dark Matter and Supernova</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-24182</link>
		<dc:creator>CelticBear&#8217;s Musings &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Interesting Science Blog Day: Dark Matter and Supernova</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 20:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/#comment-24182</guid>
		<description>[...] Also, over on Bad Astronomy blog, Phil Plait discusses the highly unusual and fantastic event of supernovae in general, and the utterly strange but fascinating frequency of novae in a nearby galaxy! Very cool and awe inspiring information. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Also, over on Bad Astronomy blog, Phil Plait discusses the highly unusual and fantastic event of supernovae in general, and the utterly strange but fascinating frequency of novae in a nearby galaxy! Very cool and awe inspiring information. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-24181</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 19:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/#comment-24181</guid>
		<description>I found this article to being really ironic. I&#039;m a freshmad astronomy/astrophysics major and I decided to take a break from some homework (I was reading about supernovae and white stars) to check out BA, and here&#039;s an article on the same thing as the chapter in my book. Amazing. I find supernovae amazing. I few seconds completely undo something that took millions of years to make. It&#039;s really cool that they found two Type 1 right next to each other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this article to being really ironic. I&#8217;m a freshmad astronomy/astrophysics major and I decided to take a break from some homework (I was reading about supernovae and white stars) to check out BA, and here&#8217;s an article on the same thing as the chapter in my book. Amazing. I find supernovae amazing. I few seconds completely undo something that took millions of years to make. It&#8217;s really cool that they found two Type 1 right next to each other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jackd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-24180</link>
		<dc:creator>jackd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/#comment-24180</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t the use of Type Ia supernovae as &#039;standard candles&#039; questioned recently?  What&#039;s the latest status?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t the use of Type Ia supernovae as &#8216;standard candles&#8217; questioned recently?  What&#8217;s the latest status?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThePolynomial</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-24179</link>
		<dc:creator>ThePolynomial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/#comment-24179</guid>
		<description>Naive question: How close would a type I supernova need to be to be dangerous? In the grand list of doomsday scenarios, I&#039;ve never heard &quot;nearest white dwarf pounds us with radiation.&quot; I have heard &quot;supernova blows up and we have 24 hour daylight for a while.&quot; How do all of these orders of magnitude match up? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naive question: How close would a type I supernova need to be to be dangerous? In the grand list of doomsday scenarios, I&#8217;ve never heard &#8220;nearest white dwarf pounds us with radiation.&#8221; I have heard &#8220;supernova blows up and we have 24 hour daylight for a while.&#8221; How do all of these orders of magnitude match up? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ioresult</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-24178</link>
		<dc:creator>ioresult</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/#comment-24178</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t white dwarfs have to pass through a series of novae before finally going through the type I supernova when it collapses into a neutron star?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t white dwarfs have to pass through a series of novae before finally going through the type I supernova when it collapses into a neutron star?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melusine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-24177</link>
		<dc:creator>Melusine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 13:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/#comment-24177</guid>
		<description>Off-topic: the Google ad was freaking out, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spacetoys.com/MarsShell/Untitled-11.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I saved it&lt;/a&gt;. Sometimes the ads are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.spaceimages.com/hubble2007.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;quite good&lt;/a&gt;.

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s nice to talk about NGC 1316 that way, but it&#039;s fascinating information nevertheless. The numbers are mind-boggling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off-topic: the Google ad was freaking out, but <a href="http://www.spacetoys.com/MarsShell/Untitled-11.jpg" rel="nofollow">I saved it</a>. Sometimes the ads are <a href="http://www.spaceimages.com/hubble2007.html" rel="nofollow">quite good</a>.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s nice to talk about NGC 1316 that way, but it&#8217;s fascinating information nevertheless. The numbers are mind-boggling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-24176</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 12:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/#comment-24176</guid>
		<description>Gee, looks like a drunk I once knew,,,

With the distance between them, looks like we should be able to obtain a very accurate distance determination, which really helps with analyzing the total energy distribution of these type 1As.

Way cool!!!

GAry 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gee, looks like a drunk I once knew,,,</p>
<p>With the distance between them, looks like we should be able to obtain a very accurate distance determination, which really helps with analyzing the total energy distribution of these type 1As.</p>
<p>Way cool!!!</p>
<p>GAry 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sticks</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-24175</link>
		<dc:creator>Sticks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 08:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/#comment-24175</guid>
		<description>This is typical, just like waiting for a bus. You wait centuries and then four turn up at once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is typical, just like waiting for a bus. You wait centuries and then four turn up at once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bswift</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/comment-page-1/#comment-24174</link>
		<dc:creator>bswift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 06:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/20/two-supernovae-no-waiting/#comment-24174</guid>
		<description>The interesting thing about these simultaneous supernovae like this, is that the SNe likely aren&#039;t simultaneous in their host galaxy.  The host systems are thousands of light years apart, occurring thousands of years apart from each other, only appearing simultaneous to us (or anyone along our line of sight, for that matter).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The interesting thing about these simultaneous supernovae like this, is that the SNe likely aren&#8217;t simultaneous in their host galaxy.  The host systems are thousands of light years apart, occurring thousands of years apart from each other, only appearing simultaneous to us (or anyone along our line of sight, for that matter).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 14:03:28 -->
