<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Horizons spots Pluto!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:48:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24569</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 06:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24569</guid>
		<description>You can still call it a dwarf planet.  People are really missing an opportunity to exhault the dwarves, it is still a pretty exclusive club.
New Horizons is pretty darn cool.  I wonder if there&#039;s been any luck finding a KBO to flyby after 2015...I wonder when the deadline is for determining the next stop (no doubt it depends on where they want to go)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can still call it a dwarf planet.  People are really missing an opportunity to exhault the dwarves, it is still a pretty exclusive club.<br />
New Horizons is pretty darn cool.  I wonder if there&#8217;s been any luck finding a KBO to flyby after 2015&#8230;I wonder when the deadline is for determining the next stop (no doubt it depends on where they want to go)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24568</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 16:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24568</guid>
		<description>D&#039;oh! I meant like the China Syndrome transfered from fiction to fact of course!

Sacks of typos as ever .. Man, I wish we could edit in this thing!

Yes that _was_ another hint. ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>D&#8217;oh! I meant like the China Syndrome transfered from fiction to fact of course!</p>
<p>Sacks of typos as ever .. Man, I wish we could edit in this thing!</p>
<p>Yes that _was_ another hint. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24567</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24567</guid>
		<description>[b]QuietDesperation[/b] Get something nuclear going eh?

What like Chernobyl or Three Mile Island or the China syndrome transfered from fact to fiction? Or like Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

Yep, just what the planet needs - more great dirty holes in the ground with stacks of pollution, radioactive waste, plutonium on tap for terrorists (incl. government terrorists which some would say include the Good ole US of A ..)

In my nation we are now being told of plans to pour acid into the ground to mine uranium for export and all of a sudden, surprise, surpise, a hand-pcked team of nuclear advocates has recomneded nuclearpower as an answer to the anthropocentric greenhouseeffect. Well if they were talking solar they&#039;d beright. But they&#039;re talking uranium fission sothey aredead wrong.

RTGs for space probes and medical isotopes are one (good) thing.

Generating serious amounts of power through a non-renewable rare fuel, mined at great cost and waste that produces dangerous, mutagenic, carcinogenic, near eternal, highly toxic, highly unstable material tahtcan be used asposions and indirty bombs and H-bombs and A-bombs -well that&#039;s another very bad, very stupid thing.

There are better ways - alternative energy from Sun, wind, tides, geothermal, space radiation, Ocean Thermal System (a la JerryPournelle) et cetera.

Nuclear we don&#039;t need. Its very much cure worse than illness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[b]QuietDesperation[/b] Get something nuclear going eh?</p>
<p>What like Chernobyl or Three Mile Island or the China syndrome transfered from fact to fiction? Or like Hiroshima and Nagasaki?</p>
<p>Yep, just what the planet needs &#8211; more great dirty holes in the ground with stacks of pollution, radioactive waste, plutonium on tap for terrorists (incl. government terrorists which some would say include the Good ole US of A ..)</p>
<p>In my nation we are now being told of plans to pour acid into the ground to mine uranium for export and all of a sudden, surprise, surpise, a hand-pcked team of nuclear advocates has recomneded nuclearpower as an answer to the anthropocentric greenhouseeffect. Well if they were talking solar they&#8217;d beright. But they&#8217;re talking uranium fission sothey aredead wrong.</p>
<p>RTGs for space probes and medical isotopes are one (good) thing.</p>
<p>Generating serious amounts of power through a non-renewable rare fuel, mined at great cost and waste that produces dangerous, mutagenic, carcinogenic, near eternal, highly toxic, highly unstable material tahtcan be used asposions and indirty bombs and H-bombs and A-bombs -well that&#8217;s another very bad, very stupid thing.</p>
<p>There are better ways &#8211; alternative energy from Sun, wind, tides, geothermal, space radiation, Ocean Thermal System (a la JerryPournelle) et cetera.</p>
<p>Nuclear we don&#8217;t need. Its very much cure worse than illness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stevo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24566</link>
		<dc:creator>Stevo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2006 15:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24566</guid>
		<description>Well I think Pluto is a planet &amp; the IAU got it wrong.

That whole &quot;cleared its orbital neighbourhood&quot; business all sounds very fuzzy logic and hard to define and plainbadscience. Cleared it sorbit What about Pluto crossing Neptune? What about trojan asteroids and indeed all the  other asteroids and comets that cross all planetary orbits? How far is a neighbourhood? What constitutes cleared?

Pluto&#039;s round, its got an atmosphere, its almost certainly geologically diferentiated, it has three moons -one large and two small, it may have rings (they hope New Horizons doesn&#039;t slam into those!) and oh yeah itdirectly orbits theSunand doesn&#039;t fuse atoms like stars! C&#039;mon its a planet!

Okay its small and its in the Kuiper belt but still  - if we found an Earth or even Mars size object there surely we&#039;d have to call that a planet -and by the same reasoning then where do we draw the line? At roundness I say or hydrostatic equilibrium and as was first proposed -so Pluto counts, Eris counts Sedna counts,Ceres counts and so what if we have  twenty or thirty or more planets in our system! The more the merrier!

Keep calling Pluto a planet Phil, don&#039;t strike it out.  The IAU plain got it wrong and until they correct their error lets just treat their misguided, unscientific and undemocratic &quot;decision&quot; with the contempt it deserves!

Anybody know if they can call an emergy meeting between the scheduled ones and remedy their stuff-up?

Great images and news too thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think Pluto is a planet &amp; the IAU got it wrong.</p>
<p>That whole &#8220;cleared its orbital neighbourhood&#8221; business all sounds very fuzzy logic and hard to define and plainbadscience. Cleared it sorbit What about Pluto crossing Neptune? What about trojan asteroids and indeed all the  other asteroids and comets that cross all planetary orbits? How far is a neighbourhood? What constitutes cleared?</p>
<p>Pluto&#8217;s round, its got an atmosphere, its almost certainly geologically diferentiated, it has three moons -one large and two small, it may have rings (they hope New Horizons doesn&#8217;t slam into those!) and oh yeah itdirectly orbits theSunand doesn&#8217;t fuse atoms like stars! C&#8217;mon its a planet!</p>
<p>Okay its small and its in the Kuiper belt but still  &#8211; if we found an Earth or even Mars size object there surely we&#8217;d have to call that a planet -and by the same reasoning then where do we draw the line? At roundness I say or hydrostatic equilibrium and as was first proposed -so Pluto counts, Eris counts Sedna counts,Ceres counts and so what if we have  twenty or thirty or more planets in our system! The more the merrier!</p>
<p>Keep calling Pluto a planet Phil, don&#8217;t strike it out.  The IAU plain got it wrong and until they correct their error lets just treat their misguided, unscientific and undemocratic &#8220;decision&#8221; with the contempt it deserves!</p>
<p>Anybody know if they can call an emergy meeting between the scheduled ones and remedy their stuff-up?</p>
<p>Great images and news too thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24565</link>
		<dc:creator>PK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24565</guid>
		<description>Hey, we&#039;re sending a Plutonium-powered probe to Pluto!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, we&#8217;re sending a Plutonium-powered probe to Pluto!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24564</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24564</guid>
		<description>Anyone else notice the object traveling &quot;south&quot; in the upper left quadrant?  Anyone know what it is?  It appears to go twice the distance as pluto in the 3 days.   Personally I think it&#039;s the UFO from Hale-Bopp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else notice the object traveling &#8220;south&#8221; in the upper left quadrant?  Anyone know what it is?  It appears to go twice the distance as pluto in the 3 days.   Personally I think it&#8217;s the UFO from Hale-Bopp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24563</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24563</guid>
		<description>Hey, I just noticed, since I had my lastest MicroSoft  system update, I no longer get the error page when posting. Phil, did Y&#039;All do something, or do you think it was an interaction with the MicroSoft system?

GAry 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, I just noticed, since I had my lastest MicroSoft  system update, I no longer get the error page when posting. Phil, did Y&#8217;All do something, or do you think it was an interaction with the MicroSoft system?</p>
<p>GAry 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Ansorge</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24562</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Ansorge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24562</guid>
		<description>Dr. Gerard K. O&#039;Niell ( of Space Studies Institute fame) said there are at least the equivelant of 3000 planet Earths (in terms of accesible resources) in the Sol system as moons, asteroids, comets, etc. The really nice thing about all these objects is their low surface gravity. We can essentially access all of their materials(except for the larger moons, like Luna) Here on Earth we can only access the top ten miles or so of the mantle.

Gee, I wonder how long it will take humanity to fill up the entire Sol system?
In Fire Fly, as in most space oriented SciFi, we assume we have to have interstellar flight in order to have enough room for a multiplicity of social experiments. In reality, if it took 10,000 years to essentially fill up the earth,(from the advent of farming) it could take 3000 times that long to fill the entire system with free orbiting colonies, moon colonies(both above ground and underground), etc. Can you visualize how many such City States there could be?,,,and how dynamic the potential interactions???

GAry 7</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dr. Gerard K. O&#8217;Niell ( of Space Studies Institute fame) said there are at least the equivelant of 3000 planet Earths (in terms of accesible resources) in the Sol system as moons, asteroids, comets, etc. The really nice thing about all these objects is their low surface gravity. We can essentially access all of their materials(except for the larger moons, like Luna) Here on Earth we can only access the top ten miles or so of the mantle.</p>
<p>Gee, I wonder how long it will take humanity to fill up the entire Sol system?<br />
In Fire Fly, as in most space oriented SciFi, we assume we have to have interstellar flight in order to have enough room for a multiplicity of social experiments. In reality, if it took 10,000 years to essentially fill up the earth,(from the advent of farming) it could take 3000 times that long to fill the entire system with free orbiting colonies, moon colonies(both above ground and underground), etc. Can you visualize how many such City States there could be?,,,and how dynamic the potential interactions???</p>
<p>GAry 7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24561</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24561</guid>
		<description>Oops, it killed my attempt at a link.  It&#039;s on the website Phil links to in his last paragraph with the words &quot;will fly past Pluto in the year 2015&quot;.  It&#039;s the second-to-last picture, and you can click it to see a larger, easier-to-read version.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, it killed my attempt at a link.  It&#8217;s on the website Phil links to in his last paragraph with the words &#8220;will fly past Pluto in the year 2015&#8243;.  It&#8217;s the second-to-last picture, and you can click it to see a larger, easier-to-read version.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24560</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24560</guid>
		<description>Actually, there will be a few horizons. . . Jupiter, Pluto and Charon to name three.  Although, as jrkeller says, I think it&#039;s considering a &quot;horizon&quot; to be the limits to our sight, and saying that we&#039;re expanding our mental view to new limits.

Looking at this: , I find myself awed by our ability to send a probe 3 billion miles away, then know where it will be within a thousand miles, and to furthermore setup the trajectory so that both Pluto and Charon will occult the Sun, and to know when it will be within 10 minutes across just over 2 hours starting 10 years from now.  They are giving a 1 month window for the start of that 2 hours, but that is still an amazing prediction.

I&#039;m also interested in the plans to do a flyby or two of Kuiper Belt objects, just because that&#039;s cool.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, there will be a few horizons. . . Jupiter, Pluto and Charon to name three.  Although, as jrkeller says, I think it&#8217;s considering a &#8220;horizon&#8221; to be the limits to our sight, and saying that we&#8217;re expanding our mental view to new limits.</p>
<p>Looking at this: , I find myself awed by our ability to send a probe 3 billion miles away, then know where it will be within a thousand miles, and to furthermore setup the trajectory so that both Pluto and Charon will occult the Sun, and to know when it will be within 10 minutes across just over 2 hours starting 10 years from now.  They are giving a 1 month window for the start of that 2 hours, but that is still an amazing prediction.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also interested in the plans to do a flyby or two of Kuiper Belt objects, just because that&#8217;s cool.  <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jrkeller</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24559</link>
		<dc:creator>jrkeller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24559</guid>
		<description>Well the definition of horizon also means,

the limit or range of perception, knowledge, or the like.

I think it fits well.

Also, the probes passes by Jupiter in approximately 90 days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the definition of horizon also means,</p>
<p>the limit or range of perception, knowledge, or the like.</p>
<p>I think it fits well.</p>
<p>Also, the probes passes by Jupiter in approximately 90 days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icemith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24558</link>
		<dc:creator>icemith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24558</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve just noticed something. The craft is called &quot;New Horizons&quot;. With an &#039;s&#039;. Plural. Which seems ironic, because where it is going, there are NO horizons, nor even one horizon.

Unless we are talking about an Event Horizon.

Ivan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve just noticed something. The craft is called &#8220;New Horizons&#8221;. With an &#8216;s&#8217;. Plural. Which seems ironic, because where it is going, there are NO horizons, nor even one horizon.</p>
<p>Unless we are talking about an Event Horizon.</p>
<p>Ivan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: icemith</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24557</link>
		<dc:creator>icemith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24557</guid>
		<description>Pity it is cloudy tonight, or I would have gone out to have a look towards Pluto.

Just kidding actually, but I do respect that little probe. Hey, it&#039;s starting to earn its keep already.

Ivan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pity it is cloudy tonight, or I would have gone out to have a look towards Pluto.</p>
<p>Just kidding actually, but I do respect that little probe. Hey, it&#8217;s starting to earn its keep already.</p>
<p>Ivan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Horizons Sights Pluto &#171; Ancora Imparo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24556</link>
		<dc:creator>New Horizons Sights Pluto &#171; Ancora Imparo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 12:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24556</guid>
		<description>[...] (thanks to the Bad Astronomy Blog) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (thanks to the Bad Astronomy Blog) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darmok</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24555</link>
		<dc:creator>Darmok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 11:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24555</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Quiet Desperation&lt;/strong&gt;, I, too, supported Plutoâ€™s reclassification (and I also support the &lt;em&gt;New Horizons&lt;/em&gt; mission!). Incidentally, it &lt;em&gt;does&lt;/em&gt; use nuclear power, of a sortâ€”the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_generator&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;radioisotope thermoelectric generator&lt;/a&gt; uses the radioactive decay of plutonium-238 to generate electricity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Quiet Desperation</strong>, I, too, supported Plutoâ€™s reclassification (and I also support the <em>New Horizons</em> mission!). Incidentally, it <em>does</em> use nuclear power, of a sortâ€”the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioisotope_thermoelectric_generator" rel="nofollow">radioisotope thermoelectric generator</a> uses the radioactive decay of plutonium-238 to generate electricity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quiet Desperation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24554</link>
		<dc:creator>Quiet Desperation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 07:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24554</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one who supported Pluto&#039;s designation being reduced? I mean, with the discovery of the Kupier objects and other &quot;riff-raff&quot; of the Solar System, it&#039;s so obvious that Pluto is one of them.

There&#039;s no room for sentimentality in science. :) I tease. But still. It&#039;s not a planet.

2015. Geez. We need new propulsion ideas really badly. :\ Can&#039;t we get something nuclear going?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one who supported Pluto&#8217;s designation being reduced? I mean, with the discovery of the Kupier objects and other &#8220;riff-raff&#8221; of the Solar System, it&#8217;s so obvious that Pluto is one of them.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s no room for sentimentality in science. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I tease. But still. It&#8217;s not a planet.</p>
<p>2015. Geez. We need new propulsion ideas really badly. :\ Can&#8217;t we get something nuclear going?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michelle Rochon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24553</link>
		<dc:creator>Michelle Rochon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 03:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24553</guid>
		<description>Oh neat!

One day, one day, it&#039;ll be bigger than 5 pixels. I can&#039;t wait to see Pluto, even though some people around me now discards it as something minor. (As if the &quot;planet&quot; title changed its nature.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh neat!</p>
<p>One day, one day, it&#8217;ll be bigger than 5 pixels. I can&#8217;t wait to see Pluto, even though some people around me now discards it as something minor. (As if the &#8220;planet&#8221; title changed its nature.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JustANuttaBackYahdah</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24552</link>
		<dc:creator>JustANuttaBackYahdah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 01:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24552</guid>
		<description>Sometimes the scale of things amaze me and this is a great example.
How fast is NH travelling?  Considering that it has only been enroute for less than a year but still has another 9 years or so to reach its destination makes our solar system seem pretty big until you compare it with our own island universe and of course the universe itself.
And I wonder why my mind wanders...
Anyway, looking forward to the pictures later on in the mission.  How soon before its arrival and how far after its flyby will  higher resolution pictures be sent back?  Regardless, it&#039;s too far to travel just to smash into something.

Clear skies, ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes the scale of things amaze me and this is a great example.<br />
How fast is NH travelling?  Considering that it has only been enroute for less than a year but still has another 9 years or so to reach its destination makes our solar system seem pretty big until you compare it with our own island universe and of course the universe itself.<br />
And I wonder why my mind wanders&#8230;<br />
Anyway, looking forward to the pictures later on in the mission.  How soon before its arrival and how far after its flyby will  higher resolution pictures be sent back?  Regardless, it&#8217;s too far to travel just to smash into something.</p>
<p>Clear skies, <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Panzer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24551</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Panzer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 01:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24551</guid>
		<description>Probably no chances for a mission redirect to impact Pluto or any of its moons.  They are hoping that between now and some time before the Pluto encounter, a more distant Kuiper Belt Object will be discovered that is close enough to NH&#039;s flight path for an encounter to be arranged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably no chances for a mission redirect to impact Pluto or any of its moons.  They are hoping that between now and some time before the Pluto encounter, a more distant Kuiper Belt Object will be discovered that is close enough to NH&#8217;s flight path for an encounter to be arranged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brant D</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/comment-page-1/#comment-24550</link>
		<dc:creator>Brant D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 23:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/11/28/new-horizons-spots-pluto/#comment-24550</guid>
		<description>After Deep Impact, I am partial to ramming large celestial objects with space probes. It&#039;s kind of like a flashy version of hitting passing roadsigns with beer bottles. Any chance New Horizons could get a mission redirect?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Deep Impact, I am partial to ramming large celestial objects with space probes. It&#8217;s kind of like a flashy version of hitting passing roadsigns with beer bottles. Any chance New Horizons could get a mission redirect?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk

Served from: blogs.discovermagazine.com @ 2012-02-14 13:02:46 -->
