<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No, we&#8217;re not &quot;overdue&quot; for an asteroid impact</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/02/no-were-not-overdue-for-an-asteroid-impact/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/02/no-were-not-overdue-for-an-asteroid-impact/</link>
	<description>I am an astronomer, writer, and skeptic. I likes reality the way it is, and I aims to keep it that way. My real name is Phil Plait, and I run the Bad Astronomy blog.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:32:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AstroGuard</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/02/no-were-not-overdue-for-an-asteroid-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-24743</link>
		<dc:creator>AstroGuard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Feb 2007 12:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/02/no-were-not-overdue-for-an-asteroid-impact/#comment-24743</guid>
		<description># we also know that none [of the asteroids] that big [10km]
# are headed our way in the immediate future.

No, unfortunately we don&#039;t. The southern hemisphere is mostly unmonitored, so any asteroid coming from that direction would likely be undetected -- as would an asteroid coming from the direction of the Sun, due to solar glare. The reality of the situation today remains largely as David Morrison (NASA) described in September 1998: &quot;With so many of even the larger NEOs remaining undiscovered, the most likely warning today would be zero -- the first indication of a collision would be the flash of light and the shaking of the ground as it hit.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p># we also know that none [of the asteroids] that big [10km]<br />
# are headed our way in the immediate future.</p>
<p>No, unfortunately we don&#8217;t. The southern hemisphere is mostly unmonitored, so any asteroid coming from that direction would likely be undetected &#8212; as would an asteroid coming from the direction of the Sun, due to solar glare. The reality of the situation today remains largely as David Morrison (NASA) described in September 1998: &#8220;With so many of even the larger NEOs remaining undiscovered, the most likely warning today would be zero &#8212; the first indication of a collision would be the flash of light and the shaking of the ground as it hit.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Swampmerchant</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/02/no-were-not-overdue-for-an-asteroid-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-24742</link>
		<dc:creator>Swampmerchant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 23:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/02/no-were-not-overdue-for-an-asteroid-impact/#comment-24742</guid>
		<description>You fellows should read Cosmic Winter by Victor Clube and Bill Napier, two distiguished british astronomers.  They contend, with significant evidence, that the distribution of astreroids and comets is anything but random through time and orbits, and that they display significant periocidity.

The placement of rocks in our path is not governed by &quot;random flips of coins&quot; but by the periodic disintegration of larger body comets which leave material bunched into discreet orbital groups.

When we see the Taurids in June we are not seeing the coin show up &quot;heads&quot; many times each June, we are seeing a non-random event.  And sometimes it is real heavy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You fellows should read Cosmic Winter by Victor Clube and Bill Napier, two distiguished british astronomers.  They contend, with significant evidence, that the distribution of astreroids and comets is anything but random through time and orbits, and that they display significant periocidity.</p>
<p>The placement of rocks in our path is not governed by &#8220;random flips of coins&#8221; but by the periodic disintegration of larger body comets which leave material bunched into discreet orbital groups.</p>
<p>When we see the Taurids in June we are not seeing the coin show up &#8220;heads&#8221; many times each June, we are seeing a non-random event.  And sometimes it is real heavy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Irishman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/02/no-were-not-overdue-for-an-asteroid-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-24741</link>
		<dc:creator>Irishman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 17:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/02/no-were-not-overdue-for-an-asteroid-impact/#comment-24741</guid>
		<description>maddbiker,

1. Posting the whole article seems excessive.

2. You apparently haven&#039;t read this blog before. Or payed much attention to what Phil actually wrote.  He previously mentioned the very article you pasted and the possibility of those results.  His article above includes a link to his previous blog entry on that topic.

3. The issue is not about whether asteroids/comets have impacted Earth, or how frequently on average it occurs.  The real complaint is against the mistaken impression given by the word &quot;overdue&quot;.  Overdue implies that there is a regular, clocklike pattern of impacts.  It implies that there is a schedule.  This is erroneous.  Random impacts are &lt;i&gt;random&lt;/i&gt;. The best we could say would be that no impacts have occurred in far longer time than any known gap in history.   That&#039;s not quite the same thing as saing that an impact will occur tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maddbiker,</p>
<p>1. Posting the whole article seems excessive.</p>
<p>2. You apparently haven&#8217;t read this blog before. Or payed much attention to what Phil actually wrote.  He previously mentioned the very article you pasted and the possibility of those results.  His article above includes a link to his previous blog entry on that topic.</p>
<p>3. The issue is not about whether asteroids/comets have impacted Earth, or how frequently on average it occurs.  The real complaint is against the mistaken impression given by the word &#8220;overdue&#8221;.  Overdue implies that there is a regular, clocklike pattern of impacts.  It implies that there is a schedule.  This is erroneous.  Random impacts are <i>random</i>. The best we could say would be that no impacts have occurred in far longer time than any known gap in history.   That&#8217;s not quite the same thing as saing that an impact will occur tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maddbiker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/02/no-were-not-overdue-for-an-asteroid-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-24740</link>
		<dc:creator>maddbiker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Dec 2006 01:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/02/no-were-not-overdue-for-an-asteroid-impact/#comment-24740</guid>
		<description>I would suggest you did some research before judging the Sun&#039;s / tabloid newspaper&#039;s report. It would appear the article is actually based on some serious scientific research, reported in the New York Times (also available on-line). This is an extract :

At the southern end of Madagascar lie four enormous wedge-shaped sediment deposits, called chevrons, that are composed of material from the ocean floor. Each covers twice the area of Manhattan with sediment as deep as the Chrysler Building is high.
On close inspection, the chevron deposits contain deep ocean microfossils that are fused with a medley of metals typically formed by cosmic impacts. And all of them point in the same direction â€” toward the middle of the Indian Ocean where a newly discovered crater, 18 miles in diameter, lies 12,500 feet below the surface.
The explanation is obvious to some scientists. A large asteroid or comet, the kind that could kill a quarter of the worldâ€™s population, smashed into the Indian Ocean 4,800 years ago, producing a tsunami at least 600 feet high, about 13 times as big as the one that inundated Indonesia nearly two years ago. The wave carried the huge deposits of sediment to land.
Most astronomers doubt that any large comets or asteroids have crashed into the Earth in the last 10,000 years. But the self-described â€œband of misfitsâ€ that make up the two-year-old Holocene Impact Working Group say that astronomers simply have not known how or where to look for evidence of such impacts along the worldâ€™s shorelines and in the deep ocean.
Scientists in the working group say the evidence for such impacts during the last 10,000 years, known as the Holocene epoch, is strong enough to overturn current estimates of how often the Earth suffers a violent impact on the order of a 10-megaton explosion. Instead of once in 500,000 to one million years, as astronomers now calculate, catastrophic impacts could happen every 1,000 years.
The researchers, who formed the working group after finding one another through an international conference, are based in the United States, Australia, Russia, France and Ireland. They are established experts in geology, geophysics, geomorphology, tsunamis, tree rings, soil science and archaeology, including the structural analysis of myth. Their efforts are just getting under way, but they will present some of their work at the American Geophysical Union meeting in December in San Francisco.
This year the group started using Google Earth, a free source of satellite images, to search around the globe for chevrons, which they interpret as evidence of past giant tsunamis. Scores of such sites have turned up in Australia, Africa, Europe and the United States, including the Hudson River Valley and Long Island.
When the chevrons all point in the same direction to open water, Dallas Abbott, an adjunct research scientist at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades, N.Y., uses a different satellite technology to look for oceanic craters. With increasing frequency, she finds them, including an especially large one dating back 4,800 years.
So far, astronomers are skeptical but are willing to look at the evidence, said David Morrison, a leading authority on asteroids and comets at the NASA Ames Research Center in Mountain View, Calif. Surveys show that as many as 185 large asteroids or comets hit the Earth in the far distant past, although most of the craters are on land. No one has spent much time looking for craters in the deep ocean, Dr. Morrison said, assuming young ones donâ€™t exist and that old ones would be filled with sediment.
Astronomers monitor every small space object with an orbit close to the Earth. â€œWe know whatâ€™s out there, when they return, how close they come,â€ Dr. Morrison said. Given their observations, â€œthere is no reason to think we have had major hits in the last 10,000 years,â€ he continued, adding, â€œBut if Dallas is right and they find 10 such events, weâ€™ll have a real contradiction on our hands.â€
Peter Bobrowsky, a senior research scientist in natural hazards at the Geological Survey of Canada, said â€œchevrons are fantastic featuresâ€ but do not prove that megatsunamis are real. There are other interpretations for how chevrons are formed, including erosion and glaciation. Dr. Bobrowsky said. It is up to the working group to prove its claims, he said.
William Ryan, a marine geologist at the Lamont Observatory, compared Dr. Abbottâ€™s work to that of other pioneering scientists who had to change the way their colleagues thought about a subject.
â€œMany of us think Dallas is really onto something,â€ Dr. Ryan said. â€œShe is building a story just like Walter Alvarez did.â€ Dr. Alvarez, a professor of earth and planetary sciences at the University of California, Berkeley, spent a decade convincing skeptics that a giant asteroid wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago.
Ted Bryant, a geomorphologist at the University of Wollongong in New South Wales, Australia, was the first person to recognize the palm prints of mega-tsunamis. Large tsunamis of 30 feet or more are caused by volcanoes, earthquakes and submarine
Deposits from mega-tsunamis contain unusual rocks with marine oyster shells, which cannot be explained by wind erosion, storm waves, volcanoes or other natural processes, Dr. Bryant said.
â€œWeâ€™re not talking about any tsunami youâ€™re ever seen,â€ Dr. Bryant said. â€œAceh was a dimple. No tsunami in the modern world could have made these features. End-of-the-world movies do not capture the size of these waves. Submarine landslides can cause major tsunamis, but they are localized. These are deposited along whole coastlines.â€
For example, Dr. Bryant identified two chevrons found over four miles inland near Carpentaria in north central Australia. Both point north. When Dr. Abbott visited a year ago, he asked her to find the craters.
To locate craters, Dr. Abbott uses sea surface altimetry data. Satellites scan the ocean surface and log the exact height of it. Underwater mountain ranges, trenches and holes in the ground disturb the Earthâ€™s gravitational field, causing sea surface heights to vary by fractions of an inch. Within 24 hours of searching the shallow water north of the two chevrons, Dr. Abbott found two craters.
Not all depressions in the ocean are impact craters, Dr. Abbott said. They can be sink holes, faults or remnant volcanoes. A check is needed. So she obtained samples from deep sea sediment cores taken in the area by the Australian Geological Survey.
The cores contain melted rocks and magnetic spheres with fractures and textures characteristic of a cosmic impact. â€œThe rock was pulverized, like it was hit with a hammer,â€ Dr. Abbott said. â€œWe found diatoms fused to tektites,â€ a glassy substance formed by meteors. The molten glass and shattered rocks could not be produced by anything other than an impact, she said.
â€œWe think these two craters are 1,200 years old,â€ Dr. Abbott said. The chevrons are well preserved and date to about the same time.
Dr. Abbott and her colleagues have located chevrons in the Caribbean, Scotland, Vietnam and North Korea, and several in the North Sea.
Hither Hills State Park on Long Island has a chevron whose front edge points to a crater in Long Island Sound, Dr. Abbott said. There is another, very faint chevron in Connecticut, and it points in a different direction.
Marie-AgnÃ¨s Courty, a soil scientist at the European Center for Prehistoric Research in Tautavel, France, is studying the worldwide distribution of cosmogenic particles from what she suspects was a major impact 4,800 years ago.
But Madagascar provides the smoking gun for geologically recent impacts. In August, Dr. Abbott, Dr. Bryant and Slava Gusiakov, from the Novosibirsk Tsunami Laboratory in Russia, visited the four huge chevrons to scoop up samples.
Last month, Dee Breger, director of microscopy at Drexel University in Philadelphia, looked at the samples under a scanning electron microscope and found benthic foraminifera, tiny fossils from the ocean floor, sprinkled throughout. Her close-ups revealed splashes of iron, nickel and chrome fused to the fossils.
When a chondritic meteor, the most common kind, vaporizes upon impact in the ocean, those three metals are formed in the same relative proportions as seen in the microfossils, Dr. Abbott said.
Ms. Breger said the microfossils appear to have melded with the condensing metals as both were lofted up out of the sea and carried long distances.
About 900 miles southeast from the Madagascar chevrons, in deep ocean, is Burckle crater, which Dr. Abbott discovered last year. Although its sediments have not been directly sampled, cores from the area contain high levels of nickel and magnetic components associated with impact ejecta.
Burckle crater has not been dated, but Dr. Abbott estimates that it is 4,500 to 5,000 years old.
It would be a great help to the cause if the National Science Foundation sent a ship equipped with modern acoustic equipment to take a closer look at Burckle, Dr. Ryan said. â€œIf it had clear impact features, the nonbelievers would believe,â€ he said.
But they might have more trouble believing one of the scientists, Bruce Masse, an environmental archaeologist at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. He thinks he can say precisely when the comet fell: on the morning of May 10, 2807 B.C.
Dr. Masse analyzed 175 flood myths from around the world, and tried to relate them to known and accurately dated natural events like solar eclipses and volcanic eruptions. Among other evidence, he said, 14 flood myths specifically mention a full solar eclipse, which could have been the one that occurred in May 2807 B.C.
Half the myths talk of a torrential downpour, Dr. Masse said. A third talk of a tsunami. Worldwide they describe hurricane force winds and darkness during the storm. All of these could come from a mega-tsunami.
Of course, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, Dr. Masse said, â€œand weâ€™re not there yet.â€
Correction: Nov. 16, 2006
An article in Science Times on Tuesday about new research suggesting that a comet or an asteroid may have struck the Indian Ocean 4,800 years ago included an incorrect estimate from researchers for the frequency of such collisions. The current estimate is one impact on the order of a 10-megaton bomb every 1,000 years, not every few thousand years. The article also misstated the name of a state park on Long Island that has a large sand wedge called a chevron, which may indicate that a comet or meteor landed in the ocean nearby. It is Hither Hills, not Heather Hill.
Correction: Dec. 1, 2006
An article in Science Times on Nov. 14 about new research suggesting that a comet or an asteroid may have struck the Indian Ocean 4,800 years ago misspelled the name of a scientist at the Geological Survey of Canada who specializes in natural hazards. He is Peter Bobrowsky, not Bobrowski.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would suggest you did some research before judging the Sun&#8217;s / tabloid newspaper&#8217;s report. It would appear the article is actually based on some serious scientific research, reported in the New York Times (also available on-line). This is an extract :</p>
<p>At the southern end of Madagascar lie four enormous wedge-shaped sediment deposits, called chevrons, that are composed of material from the ocean floor. Each covers twice the area of Manhattan with sediment as deep as the Chrysler Building is high.<br />
On close inspection, the chevron deposits contain deep ocean microfossils that are fused with a medley of metals typically formed by cosmic impacts. And all of them point in the same direction â€” toward the middle of the Indian Ocean where a newly discovered crater, 18 miles in diameter, lies 12,500 feet below the surface.<br />
The explanation is obvious to some scientists. A large asteroid or comet, the kind that could kill a quarter of the worldâ€™s population, smashed into the Indian Ocean 4,800 years ago, producing a tsunami at least 600 feet high, about 13 times as big as the one that inundated Indonesia nearly two years ago. The wave carried the huge deposits of sediment to land.<br />
Most astronomers doubt that any large comets or asteroids have crashed into the Earth in the last 10,000 years. But the self-described â€œband of misfitsâ€ that make up the two-year-old Holocene Impact Working Group say that astronomers simply have not known how or where to look for evidence of such impacts along the worldâ€™s shorelines and in the deep ocean.<br />
Scientists in the working group say the evidence for such impacts during the last 10,000 years, known as the Holocene epoch, is strong enough to overturn current estimates of how often the Earth suffers a violent impact on the order of a 10-megaton explosion. Instead of once in 500,000 to one million years, as astronomers now calculate, catastrophic impacts could happen every 1,000 years.<br />
The researchers, who formed the working group after finding one another through an international conference, are based in the United States, Australia, Russia, France and Ireland. They are established experts in geology, geophysics, geomorphology, tsunamis, tree rings, soil science and archaeology, including the structural analysis of myth. Their efforts are just getting under way, but they will present some of their work at the American Geophysical Union meeting in December in San Francisco.<br />
This year the group started using Google Earth, a free source of satellite images, to search around the globe for chevrons, which they interpret as evidence of past giant tsunamis. Scores of such sites have turned up in Australia, Africa, Europe and the United States, including the Hudson River Valley and Long Island.<br />
When the chevrons all point in the same direction to open water, Dallas Abbott, an adjunct research scientist at Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory in Palisades, N.Y., uses a different satellite technology to look for oceanic craters. With increasing frequency, she finds them, including an especially large one dating back 4,800 years.<br />
So far, astronomers are skeptical but are willing to look at the evidence, said David Morrison, a leading authority on asteroids and comets at the NASA Ames Research Center in Mountain View, Calif. Surveys show that as many as 185 large asteroids or comets hit the Earth in the far distant past, although most of the craters are on land. No one has spent much time looking for craters in the deep ocean, Dr. Morrison said, assuming young ones donâ€™t exist and that old ones would be filled with sediment.<br />
Astronomers monitor every small space object with an orbit close to the Earth. â€œWe know whatâ€™s out there, when they return, how close they come,â€ Dr. Morrison said. Given their observations, â€œthere is no reason to think we have had major hits in the last 10,000 years,â€ he continued, adding, â€œBut if Dallas is right and they find 10 such events, weâ€™ll have a real contradiction on our hands.â€<br />
Peter Bobrowsky, a senior research scientist in natural hazards at the Geological Survey of Canada, said â€œchevrons are fantastic featuresâ€ but do not prove that megatsunamis are real. There are other interpretations for how chevrons are formed, including erosion and glaciation. Dr. Bobrowsky said. It is up to the working group to prove its claims, he said.<br />
William Ryan, a marine geologist at the Lamont Observatory, compared Dr. Abbottâ€™s work to that of other pioneering scientists who had to change the way their colleagues thought about a subject.<br />
â€œMany of us think Dallas is really onto something,â€ Dr. Ryan said. â€œShe is building a story just like Walter Alvarez did.â€ Dr. Alvarez, a professor of earth and planetary sciences at the University of California, Berkeley, spent a decade convincing skeptics that a giant asteroid wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago.<br />
Ted Bryant, a geomorphologist at the University of Wollongong in New South Wales, Australia, was the first person to recognize the palm prints of mega-tsunamis. Large tsunamis of 30 feet or more are caused by volcanoes, earthquakes and submarine<br />
Deposits from mega-tsunamis contain unusual rocks with marine oyster shells, which cannot be explained by wind erosion, storm waves, volcanoes or other natural processes, Dr. Bryant said.<br />
â€œWeâ€™re not talking about any tsunami youâ€™re ever seen,â€ Dr. Bryant said. â€œAceh was a dimple. No tsunami in the modern world could have made these features. End-of-the-world movies do not capture the size of these waves. Submarine landslides can cause major tsunamis, but they are localized. These are deposited along whole coastlines.â€<br />
For example, Dr. Bryant identified two chevrons found over four miles inland near Carpentaria in north central Australia. Both point north. When Dr. Abbott visited a year ago, he asked her to find the craters.<br />
To locate craters, Dr. Abbott uses sea surface altimetry data. Satellites scan the ocean surface and log the exact height of it. Underwater mountain ranges, trenches and holes in the ground disturb the Earthâ€™s gravitational field, causing sea surface heights to vary by fractions of an inch. Within 24 hours of searching the shallow water north of the two chevrons, Dr. Abbott found two craters.<br />
Not all depressions in the ocean are impact craters, Dr. Abbott said. They can be sink holes, faults or remnant volcanoes. A check is needed. So she obtained samples from deep sea sediment cores taken in the area by the Australian Geological Survey.<br />
The cores contain melted rocks and magnetic spheres with fractures and textures characteristic of a cosmic impact. â€œThe rock was pulverized, like it was hit with a hammer,â€ Dr. Abbott said. â€œWe found diatoms fused to tektites,â€ a glassy substance formed by meteors. The molten glass and shattered rocks could not be produced by anything other than an impact, she said.<br />
â€œWe think these two craters are 1,200 years old,â€ Dr. Abbott said. The chevrons are well preserved and date to about the same time.<br />
Dr. Abbott and her colleagues have located chevrons in the Caribbean, Scotland, Vietnam and North Korea, and several in the North Sea.<br />
Hither Hills State Park on Long Island has a chevron whose front edge points to a crater in Long Island Sound, Dr. Abbott said. There is another, very faint chevron in Connecticut, and it points in a different direction.<br />
Marie-AgnÃ¨s Courty, a soil scientist at the European Center for Prehistoric Research in Tautavel, France, is studying the worldwide distribution of cosmogenic particles from what she suspects was a major impact 4,800 years ago.<br />
But Madagascar provides the smoking gun for geologically recent impacts. In August, Dr. Abbott, Dr. Bryant and Slava Gusiakov, from the Novosibirsk Tsunami Laboratory in Russia, visited the four huge chevrons to scoop up samples.<br />
Last month, Dee Breger, director of microscopy at Drexel University in Philadelphia, looked at the samples under a scanning electron microscope and found benthic foraminifera, tiny fossils from the ocean floor, sprinkled throughout. Her close-ups revealed splashes of iron, nickel and chrome fused to the fossils.<br />
When a chondritic meteor, the most common kind, vaporizes upon impact in the ocean, those three metals are formed in the same relative proportions as seen in the microfossils, Dr. Abbott said.<br />
Ms. Breger said the microfossils appear to have melded with the condensing metals as both were lofted up out of the sea and carried long distances.<br />
About 900 miles southeast from the Madagascar chevrons, in deep ocean, is Burckle crater, which Dr. Abbott discovered last year. Although its sediments have not been directly sampled, cores from the area contain high levels of nickel and magnetic components associated with impact ejecta.<br />
Burckle crater has not been dated, but Dr. Abbott estimates that it is 4,500 to 5,000 years old.<br />
It would be a great help to the cause if the National Science Foundation sent a ship equipped with modern acoustic equipment to take a closer look at Burckle, Dr. Ryan said. â€œIf it had clear impact features, the nonbelievers would believe,â€ he said.<br />
But they might have more trouble believing one of the scientists, Bruce Masse, an environmental archaeologist at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. He thinks he can say precisely when the comet fell: on the morning of May 10, 2807 B.C.<br />
Dr. Masse analyzed 175 flood myths from around the world, and tried to relate them to known and accurately dated natural events like solar eclipses and volcanic eruptions. Among other evidence, he said, 14 flood myths specifically mention a full solar eclipse, which could have been the one that occurred in May 2807 B.C.<br />
Half the myths talk of a torrential downpour, Dr. Masse said. A third talk of a tsunami. Worldwide they describe hurricane force winds and darkness during the storm. All of these could come from a mega-tsunami.<br />
Of course, extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof, Dr. Masse said, â€œand weâ€™re not there yet.â€<br />
Correction: Nov. 16, 2006<br />
An article in Science Times on Tuesday about new research suggesting that a comet or an asteroid may have struck the Indian Ocean 4,800 years ago included an incorrect estimate from researchers for the frequency of such collisions. The current estimate is one impact on the order of a 10-megaton bomb every 1,000 years, not every few thousand years. The article also misstated the name of a state park on Long Island that has a large sand wedge called a chevron, which may indicate that a comet or meteor landed in the ocean nearby. It is Hither Hills, not Heather Hill.<br />
Correction: Dec. 1, 2006<br />
An article in Science Times on Nov. 14 about new research suggesting that a comet or an asteroid may have struck the Indian Ocean 4,800 years ago misspelled the name of a scientist at the Geological Survey of Canada who specializes in natural hazards. He is Peter Bobrowsky, not Bobrowski.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Siefert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/02/no-were-not-overdue-for-an-asteroid-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-24739</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Siefert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 22:18:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/02/no-were-not-overdue-for-an-asteroid-impact/#comment-24739</guid>
		<description>And since I am &quot;sciency&quot;, I insist that we say that 10 miles is about 16 kilometres.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And since I am &#8220;sciency&#8221;, I insist that we say that 10 miles is about 16 kilometres.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Siefert</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/02/no-were-not-overdue-for-an-asteroid-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-24738</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Siefert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 22:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/02/no-were-not-overdue-for-an-asteroid-impact/#comment-24738</guid>
		<description>&quot;(22 kilometer if youâ€™re sciency)&quot; or if you are any other nationality other than English or American :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;(22 kilometer if youâ€™re sciency)&#8221; or if you are any other nationality other than English or American <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt J</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/02/no-were-not-overdue-for-an-asteroid-impact/comment-page-1/#comment-24737</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2006 20:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2006/12/02/no-were-not-overdue-for-an-asteroid-impact/#comment-24737</guid>
		<description>I wish an asteroid would smack into one of the rocky bodies of the solar system, preferably one close to Earth (but not Earth itself - that would be a huge inconvenience and would disrupt my important schedule of being a lazy bum). Seeing Jupiter take some lumps was cool, but we didn&#039;t get to see lasting impact formations, and there&#039;s little left of the impacts that we can actually study (if there&#039;s anything left at all). I want to see Mercury or Venus get the snot knocked out of it by a 10-mile (22 kilometer if you&#039;re sciency) wide monster. Having one that size hit Mars would be even cooler because hey, we&#039;ve got stuff on the planet and orbiting it that could record the effects! Unfortunately, I&#039;ll probably be dead and my carbon atoms recycled through the Earth&#039;s mantle several times over before THAT happens. Poo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish an asteroid would smack into one of the rocky bodies of the solar system, preferably one close to Earth (but not Earth itself &#8211; that would be a huge inconvenience and would disrupt my important schedule of being a lazy bum). Seeing Jupiter take some lumps was cool, but we didn&#8217;t get to see lasting impact formations, and there&#8217;s little left of the impacts that we can actually study (if there&#8217;s anything left at all). I want to see Mercury or Venus get the snot knocked out of it by a 10-mile (22 kilometer if you&#8217;re sciency) wide monster. Having one that size hit Mars would be even cooler because hey, we&#8217;ve got stuff on the planet and orbiting it that could record the effects! Unfortunately, I&#8217;ll probably be dead and my carbon atoms recycled through the Earth&#8217;s mantle several times over before THAT happens. Poo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
